It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
The government is compiling a database to track and store the international travel records of millions of Britons.
Computerised records of all 250 million journeys made by individuals in and out of the UK each year will be kept for up to 10 years.
So the government has your DNA, they have your personal details and they know your whereabouts at all times (RFID, CCTV or whatever) - what is it that they are going to do with this information that is so detrimental to you?
I ask this question honestly and in a non-argumentative manner as I do not see how I could be impacted by the government having my details on a DNA database. The only possible reasons I can think of are:
>>>They want to frame someone by using their DNA
There are far more simple, cost-effective, non-invasive, non-controversial and discreet methods for doing this.
>>>Monitor and remove dissenters of the government
You wouldn't need the DNA and besides, most dissenters are not too shy when it comes to public appearences against the government i.e. protests et al.
If there was a central governmental DNA database then what would they use it for?
Originally posted by skibtz
Governments will always be corrupt and self-serving, it's what they do best
Originally posted by skibtzWhat I want to know is what are they going to do with the information that is so detrimental?
Originally posted by skibtzLet's take you for example, they have all of your details in a database. Everything: DNA, whereabouts at all times, lifestyle habits, work habits, everything.
What is it that they are going to do with this information that is so detrimental to you?
Originally posted by skibtz
Hey, first of all, drop the attitude - I am asking a serious question and am looking for a serious answer - with your theatrical posting skills you may well end up being The Last Man On Earth!
Originally posted by skibtzYou say that the government could take your home and/or ruin your life.
Originally posted by skibtzAny government can do this at anytime - they do not need a database to do this. In fact, secret services worldwide have used this tactic many many times to bring down thousands of dissenters.
Originally posted by skibtzYou then say that the database says that you are a criminal - well, it is a judicial system that will decide if you are a criminal or not, and if it so happens to be on record that you are a criminal and you are trying to leave the country then the database has done it's job.
Originally posted by skibtzAs far as fuzzy CCTV images go, no court in the land uses these images to convict people if the image is not of sufficient quality and the suspect can be determined beyond reasonable doubt.
Originally posted by skibtzRight now I am totally ok with it. You have so far been unable to present a case against such a system.
Originally posted by skibtzYou say that you have nothing to hide - as far as I can see, these systems are designed to protect those of us with nothing to hide.
Originally posted by skibtzAnd yet you are prepared to reduce global security, whether it be relating to serious crime, acts of terrorism or other activities that harm society, because to you it's just 'the principle of the thing'.
Originally posted by skibtzAre you saying that you are happy to impose your principles at the cost security?
Originally posted by skibtzAnd yes, I do believe that there are elements of terrorism that exist that are not government-sponsored. There are people who deal in arms, traffic vast quantities of drugs and men women and children in order to live the rich man's dream.
Originally posted by skibtzIf systems like this can reduce the number of people who suffer at the hands of serious criminals then I am all for it and I am prepared to ignore your 'principles' to get the job done.
[edit on 8/2/2009 by skibtz]
Minister of State for borders and immigration Phil Woolas said the government was determined to ensure the UK's border remained one of the toughest in the world.
Originally posted by kindred
I wouldn't take it personally skibtz, people are simply stating facts.
Originally posted by kindred
Not necessarily, if what someone is saying is backed up by irrefutable proof or evidence, then you'd be unwise to ignore it.
It's obvious to anyone that the EU & New Labour are obsessed with collecting information on everyone. Unfortunately they keep losing it, which is another valid reason not to trust them.