It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Hemmer told Pope they're just helium balloons.
Originally posted by Schaden
"But what if they're friendly ? Why shoot them down ? "
Originally posted by Schaden
Nick Pope was just interviewed via satellite from London by Fox News Bill Hemmer and Megan Kelley. They were both incredulous to Pope stating Royal AF planes had engaged UFOs in dogfights. Kelley repeated but he is a govt official, Hemmer told Pope they're just helium balloons. Pope told him yeah some are, but the military only cares about the 5% that are something specials and he also mentioned the F-4's weapons computer being shut down by the UFO in Iran.
Originally posted by Schaden
And now when I type this Hemmer brought it up again after the segment was already over with. He just blurted out, "But what if they're friendly ? Why shoot them down ? "And it finally occurred to him, why shooting down UFOs might not be a good policy.
Originally posted by karl 12
As for Fox news,theres a good presentation here about media manipulation,bias and suppression when dealing with the UFO subject...
Originally posted by Majorion
I'm sure he did, typical media programmed response
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
Yes, both Kelley and Hemmer did sound incredulous about the "virtual dog-fight," and I do think that Pope was being a bit sensationalistic in characterizing some of these incidents as "dog-fights."
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
Originally posted by Schaden
And now when I type this Hemmer brought it up again after the segment was already over with. He just blurted out, "But what if they're friendly ? Why shoot them down ? "And it finally occurred to him, why shooting down UFOs might not be a good policy.
This part you have grossly mischaracterized and twisted. Hemmer did not blurt out anything; he was talking about a viewer email. Again, a rough transcript...
Originally posted by Schaden
Sensationalistic are you kidding ? What about the 1976 Tehran UFO incident. The big UFO deployed a smaller UFO which chased the fighters. If that's not a dog fight, I don't know what is.
Originally posted by NuclearPaul
Originally posted by Schaden
"But what if they're friendly ? Why shoot them down ? "
Maybe that is precisely the reason why they are trying to shoot them down?
"We have stacks of reports about flying saucers. We take them seriously when you consider we have lost many men and planes trying to intercept them."
GENERAL BENJAMIN CHIDLAW
Air Defense Command
"At this time the reports of incidents convince us that there is something going on that must have immediate attention. Sightings of unexplained objects at high altitudes and traveling at high speeds in the vicinity of major U.S. defense installations are of such nature that they are not attributable to natural phenomena or known types of vehicles."
H. MARSHALL CHADWELL
Assistant Director of Scientific Intelligence, CIA
December 2, 1952
"No agency in this country or Russia is able to duplicate at this time the speeds and accelerations which radars and observers indicate these flying objects are able to achieve... there are objects coming into our atmosphere at very high speeds."
ADMIRAL DELMER S. FAHMEY
Former Head U.S. Navy Guided-Missile Program
New York Times, Page 31, January 17, 1957
"UFO sightings are now so common, the military doesn't have time to worry about them. . .when a UFO appears, they simply ignore it. . .Unconventional targets are ignored because apparently we are only interested in Russian targets, possibly enemy targets. Something that hovers in the air, then shoots off at 5,000 miles per hour, doesn't interest us, because it can't be the enemy. UFOs are picked up by ground and air radar, and they have been photographed by gun camera all along. There are so many UFOs in the sky that the Air Force has had to employ special radar networks to screen them out."
LEE KATCHEN
NASA atmospheric physicist
June 7, 1968
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
I find this a bit humorous. Where one side sees "preparation for disclosure" in every single mention of the words "aliens" or "UFOs," the other sees "media cover-up" and "typical media response."
Due to my job, I have access to almost every news-broadcast in the United States. I found the segment in question, and found that you have mischaracterized it a bit.
the term "dog fight" invokes certain images
Originally posted by Majorion
And I find your avatar to be sickly humorous, the point being?
Originally posted by Majorion
I don't see media covering up anything; as you suggested Mr. "go save yourself first"...Twisting my words again are you? .. another act of discrediting the opinionated?
Originally posted by Majorion
You only posted the media's quotes(Hemmer and Kelley), a clear sign of bias.
Originally posted by Majorion
And as a researched poster suggested earlier, the term is quite appropriate for some UFO cases of like Tehran 76.
Originally posted by Schaden
Sensationalistic are you kidding ? What about the 1976 Tehran UFO incident. The big UFO deployed a smaller UFO which chased the fighters. If that's not a dog fight, I don't know what is.
Originally posted by Majorion
And as a researched poster suggested earlier, the term is quite appropriate for some UFO cases of like Tehran 76.
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
There is no need for personal attacks.
Speaking of twisting words, I didn't say you did. In fact, I posted quotes from two people; funny how you left that out.
It is very clear who said what and I did not try to pin those words on you.
I find this a bit humorous. Where one side sees "preparation for disclosure" in every single mention of the words "aliens" or "UFOs," the other sees "media cover-up" and "typical media response."
I was contrasting two groups of believers; one who sees disclosure in every broadcast and one that sees either a cover-up or typical media mockery.
The issue was not what Nick Pope said, so I did not feel it necessary to post what he said.
As I said before, the term "dog-fight" invokes certain images, like that of WWII air combat. So yes, the use of the term is sensationalistic.
But you will notice, since you ignored it (in a lame effort to twist my words) that I said the term air-to-air combat would be appropriate, and less sensationalistic.