Interview: 'Third party behind Mumbai attack'

Interview: 'Third party behind Mumbai attack'

sify.com

Awar between India and Pakistan is unthinkable, believes Shah Zaman Khan ,Minister, Press, at the Pakistan High Commission in New Delhi.

The war hysteria in both nations is being fuelled by “one common enemy that does not want India and Pakistan to be friends,” the senior Pakistani diplomat asserts. “What we have seen in Mumbai is altogether a third party conspiracy.”

Special:Mumbai Terror Attack

Khan, who has a Master’s Degree in Economics, joined the Pakistan Foreign Service in 1978, and has served as Joint Secretary of the Information and Broadcasting Ministry in Islamabad and Director General of the troubled North West Frontier Province before being posted to New Delhi in late 2007.

“The media has created all these clouds and in a week or two, all these clouds of war are expected to vanish,” Khan told Chetan Upadhyaya of the Satya Foundation in an exclusive interview. Khan also answered two other questions from people who phoned in during this interview.

(visit the link for the full news article)

Mod Edit: Breaking News Forum Submission Guidelines – Please Review This Link.



[edit on 2/1/2009 by Mirthful Me]

Neither India or Pakistan would profit from a war. Pakistan is a state recovering from the Afghan war and India is a nation planning on going places and has a massive problem lifting 100s of millions from immense poverty. Both countries are technologically advancing and may become the new Asian Tigers. So why an evil and outrageous terror act? Radicals on both sides as the cause is rubbish. Both countries have advanced ecurity services that would track and terminate any home grown terrorist groups that act outside national agendas.

It has to be a false flag third party operation that wishes to to divide and conquer the emerging Asian countries. Focus should not necessarily rest on the US; it wants to stabilise the region. China is cautious of a west leaning India but it is not in their style to fix what is not broken.

Israeli cannot exist without a crises and has a record of false flag operations. Examples are the USS Liberty, the Mossad agents caught trying to bomb the Mexican congress to stampede the Mexican people into war with the Arabs, the Lavon Affair, etc. So according to its nature and its mission to wage a war of civilisations it is suspect number one.

sify.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

reply to post by masonwatcher


So, as usual, mason has no proof, only his hate spewing against Israel and Jewish people in general.

I agree it is third parties causing problems for both Pakistan and India.

We all know that the third party is muslim, terrorists.

Here is a dollar, buy a clue.

reply to post by mrmonsoon


man you really need to get a clue
the country that you defend profit from every war going on now

seriously man

Originally posted by ModernAcademia
reply to post by mrmonsoon

 

man you really need to get a clue
the country that you defend profit from every war going on now

seriously man

YOU need to get a clue.

Muslims terrorist benefit from all the terrorist attacks in the world. (like in India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Russia, Philippines, US, Even china has Muslim terrorist issues)

Btw, you to address your point, it would be truly amazing “IF” a country of 8 million or so can do and influence the entire world.

My god, they are powerful, better go hide.

Fantastic post, I completely agree that a third party is behind the Mumbai attacks. I wonder about the Mumbai attacks shooter who was captured after his rampage in the Hotel Taj. What did he know or say?

A war between Pakistan and India is simply insane.

Do vast majority of Indians and Pakistanis know about: 1) Details of the mumbai attacks and 2) That someone was calling for a horrible war between their countries without consent from them, possibly using nuclear weapons.

India especially has a dense population base. Loss of life from targeted nuclear missiles would potentially be in the dozens, perhaps hundreds of millions.

The pot-of-war agitators (whoever the hell they are) are okay with this?

And Pakistan might not even be the ones who attacks India, but those secret elements, the false flag attackers, to top it off.

In this world, we have the legitimate government, and we have the secret government (Organizations, Gangs, families, hell-bent on global control (Bilderbergians) or Pillagery (Skulls and Bones) only two sad examples.

The perceived measure of their power exists only in our minds and actions.

Originally posted by mrmonsoon

Originally posted by ModernAcademia
reply to post by mrmonsoon

 

man you really need to get a clue
the country that you defend profit from every war going on now

seriously man

YOU need to get a clue.

Muslims terrorist benefit from all the terrorist attacks in the world.

(like in India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Russia, Philippines, US, Even china has Muslim terrorist issues)

Btw, you to address your point, it would be truly amazing “IF” a country of 8 million or so can do and influence the entire world.

My god, they are powerful, better go hide.

To quote you,

"If you're just going to troll, could you type less so that we don't have to waste as much time reading this nonsense?"

and who would these third party perpetuators be? It is always great to make assumptions but unsubstantiated wild guesses dont lead to outcomes, but result in complexity.

The fact remains the same. The attacks were originated from pakistan territory.

Let me ask you this question. If you had a someone you know come over from say texas. After having a few beers the guest decides to throw the empty can in the neighbours house. Unfortunately he gets caught out by the neighbour and the neighbour questions his actions. Does that mean that the act was performed by a party situated in Texas or is it an act that happened at your home towards your neighbour?

The act mind can conjurer many possibilities and I would not like to disencourage this process, however the fact of simplicity lie in the material at hand.

History has given enough evidence of the facts and there have been enough wars to establish the hatred of one against the other.

The stance of US is as per their policy and best interest and there is no denial of this concrete fact. This is politics, at a global scale and india should take a tougher stance.

There is a valid agrument about both countries exchanging damages and India could have a number higher than expected, however, this is something that needs to be weighed.

A weed growing amongst flowers cannot be trimmed, it needs to be killed for the beauty of the flower bed and with this in mind, the future generations of the country need to be secured by the actions of the indian government today, not by mere dialogue.

Gandhian era existed and is still possible to adopt, unfortunately the adversary, cannot be conjurered in the way the great mahatma could produce.

I would wish that a war doesnt happen however if facts keep on mounting towards pakistan there will be no other alternative.

Rgds
k