It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Pictures of UFOs taken by NASA

page: 1
3
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 11 2008 @ 02:38 AM
link   
All of these official nasa pictures have something strange in them.
The question Im asking you is what are the unidentified objects?














source

Incase you are having trouble seeing them I took the time to circle it for you.
Id love to hear you guys explain this away!



posted on Dec, 11 2008 @ 02:51 AM
link   
Spaceships, obviously



posted on Dec, 11 2008 @ 02:54 AM
link   
Thats exactly what I was thinking!



posted on Dec, 11 2008 @ 02:59 AM
link   
Pictures 1, 2, and 6 are obviously lens flares.

The rest I have no idea



posted on Dec, 11 2008 @ 03:02 AM
link   
Haha there is probably lots of possible explanations. But the weather balloon excuse wont work on this one


Seriously though some could be light reflecting off the lens, or photoshopped. Something doesnt feel right about one or two, especially the 'apollo 15 1971' pic it looks fake.



posted on Dec, 11 2008 @ 03:06 AM
link   
If not weather balloons... Surely Chinese Lanterns or Moon Swamp Gas




posted on Dec, 11 2008 @ 03:12 AM
link   
NASA would say moondust or sunglare or camera error or rocks or hills or venus or myst.

No Anomaly Seen Ahaha.




Cheers!!!!



posted on Dec, 11 2008 @ 03:24 AM
link   
yeah dont get your hopes up! They look like lens flares or reflections from the sun or another planet.

The last ones however, i don't know what to think of them!



posted on Dec, 11 2008 @ 03:26 AM
link   
yes, swamp gas on the moon, that has to be what it is



posted on Dec, 11 2008 @ 04:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by RFBurns

No Anomaly Seen Ahaha.


I would say the same with the lens flare thing for 1,2 & 6 however those are just a few pics of dozens you could have picked let alone the numerous videos which are a lot more difficult to dismiss - tether incident?
Like i said in another thread i doubt nasa will disclose what they are hiding due to the fact that they are a little trapped behind their lies and any disclosure will expose this fact and cause people to lose respect for them. Until the US govt and nasa can be freed from any accountabillity for the lies and any actions that have happened because of those lies then disclosure will never happen unless it is forced by an alien race.



posted on Dec, 11 2008 @ 04:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by SuperSlovak
All of these official nasa pictures have something strange in them.
The question Im asking you is what are the unidentified objects?




AS12-49-7278:
Classic lens flare
history.nasa.gov...





AS15-85-11514
Same as above: lens flare without a shadow of doubt






AS14-70-9836 :
part of a sequence of three very strange photos:


AS14-70-9835
www.lpi.usra.edu...

AS14-70-9836
www.lpi.usra.edu...

AS14-70-9837
www.lpi.usra.edu...


Animation:


in my humble opinion, it looks like some light being cast to the lunar surface: some questions are: what's the source? Why that appearance? Why no mention in the image description?





Alleged UFO photo taken during apollo 15 mission: i don't recall to have been able to track down the original, since its number is missing.





Ah, once again: EVA floodlight/boom

Beginning their return from the moon to an April 27, 1972, splashdown, Astronauts John Young, Thomas Mattingly and Charles Duke captured about four seconds of video footage of an object that seemed to look a lot like Hollywood's version of a spacecraft from another world.





See article:
UFO No Longer Unidentified





AS16-114-18422: yet another classic lens flare






Ufo filmed during STS-37 Mission

Google Video Link


VERY interesting video in my humble opinion, even if many dismissed it as some water droplet on the lens:

Thanks for sharing



posted on Dec, 11 2008 @ 04:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by cropmuncher

Originally posted by RFBurns

No Anomaly Seen Ahaha.


I would say the same with the lens flare thing for 1,2 & 6 however those are just a few pics of dozens you could have picked let alone the numerous videos which are a lot more difficult to dismiss - tether incident?
Like i said in another thread i doubt nasa will disclose what they are hiding due to the fact that they are a little trapped behind their lies and any disclosure will expose this fact and cause people to lose respect for them. Until the US govt and nasa can be freed from any accountabillity for the lies and any actions that have happened because of those lies then disclosure will never happen unless it is forced by an alien race.



Dont misunderstand my post or my little moniker. Quite the opposite. Here let me show you just a sample of my moniker's for NASA and then maybe you will see how I feel about NASA.


NASA=
Nasty Anomaly Scene Airbrush
Nasty Anomaly Scene Airbrushers
Neatly Aquired Secret Anomalies
Never A Straight Answer
Never Acknowledge Something Absolute
Never Admits Something Anomalous
Never Any Sense Alright.
Never Any Sensible Answer
Never Any Serious Accountability
Never Any Serious Attention
Never Any Serious Attitude
Never Any Social Advancement
Never Anything Seriously Accepted
Never Anything Seriously Admitted
Never Another Significant Achievement
Never Another Step Ahead
Never Acknowledge Scams Agency
New Age Scientific Abomination
New Anomaly Secretly Aquired.
New Anomaly Shrouded Abundantly
Nice Acknowledgements Secretly Admired
Newly Aquired Secret Anomaly
Nice Analysis Seems Absent
Nice And Senseless Answers
No Actual Scientific Analysis
No Actual Sensor Aquisition
No Actual Sighting Aquired
No Actual Signal Aquired
No Admittance Sure Acceptable
No Admiration Since Adam
No Adult Supervision Available
No American Sense Alright
No American Sense Anyway
No American Social Advancement
No American Space Access
No Anomalies Seems Attractive
No Anomalous Samples Acknowledged
No Anomalous Snapshots Aired
No Anomaly Samples Acknowledged
No Anomaly Seen Admitted
No Anomaly Seen Anyway
No Answer Same Answer
No Answer Seems Acceptable
No Answer Seems Alright
No Anomaly So Ahaha
No Answer So Ahaha
No Answer Sounds Acceptable
No Attributable Signficance Always
Nonsense Abundancy Scam Agency
Non Affirming Sidetracked Analysis
Not A Single Admiration
Not All Seen Anyway
Not Any Sensible Accomplishment
Not Any Single Admittance
Not Always Straight Anyway
Not Anybody Says Anything
Not Anything Seen Alright
Not Anything Succeeded Always
Nothing About Space Admitted
Nothing Admitted So Ahaha
Nothing Anyway So Ahaha
Nothing At Scientific Achievement
Now A Serious Analysis
Now Acting Shockingly Asinine
Now Acting Shockingly Astonished
Now Acting Stupidly Asinine
Now Acting Stupidly Astonished
Now Acting Surprisingly Asinine
Now Acting Surprisingly Astonished
Now Another Sacred Analogy
Now Another Senseless Acquistion
Now Another Silly Analysis
Now Another Silly Answer
Now Another Silly Avenue
Now Another Step Almost
Now Another Stupid Analysis







Cheers!!!!



posted on Dec, 11 2008 @ 06:00 AM
link   
Lens flares and reflections of lights INSIDE the spacecraft.

Come on people get real.



posted on Dec, 11 2008 @ 06:06 AM
link   
internos you rock! Keep the images coming because internos can totally debunk the living hell out of em!

btw hi internos



posted on Dec, 11 2008 @ 06:55 AM
link   
Great work Internos!The flood light one had me fooled at first,but your explanation is spot on.




posted on Dec, 11 2008 @ 09:01 AM
link   
Ok, but... what about are the STARS??????????????????



posted on Dec, 11 2008 @ 09:26 AM
link   
One or two are planets, or moons of the planet itself.



posted on Dec, 11 2008 @ 09:35 AM
link   
if these are lens flares...then whats making them?...



posted on Dec, 11 2008 @ 07:14 PM
link   
I dont know how you do it internos but I wish I had a brain like yours!thanks for helping me open my eyes.



posted on Dec, 11 2008 @ 10:10 PM
link   
The one that looks like lights shining on the moon... Could it be some exotic gas that had escaped from the surface and was slowly dissipating?




top topics



 
3
<<   2 >>

log in

join