It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NavalFC
reply to post by mellisamouse
Marks and bumps in and of themselves do not prove alien implants. proof would be having them removed and such, when you could see whether or not they were alien in origin. So far no testing or observation of any implant has shown such.
originally posted by: Ascens1on
Good Job, Tezzaj! This Naval guy strikes me as someone paid by the government to discredit ET existence.
originally posted by: one4all
Excellent perspective ,thank you,I believe that it is the personal choice to make a decision to accept specific information to be reality when one considers evidence THAT supercedes in importance the weighted value of the evidence itself.
What I am saying is that I could put a real piece of nonterrestrial metal in your hand and you would have to make a personal choice to accept that it is what I say it is.and before you do that you will have to make a personal choice wether the lab that did the actual testing was the very best lab available?,then you would have to have made a personal choice before all of this that something merritted your investigative curiosity in the first place.
This my dear Watson,is proof that you do in fact accept that there exists a perspective that includes these things and you naturally want to find,or learn,or share that new perspective
All that is left for you to do is decide which pieces of evidence are the most authentic because we have already established that you accept that something exists based on the merit of your personal choice to engage in an exchange of perspectives.
originally posted by: NavalFC
many of thse surgeries are done by one man, whom these documentaries always refer to as a surgeon or try to make him out to be famous or reknown, when hes not, and what the shows dont tell you is that the man is a podiatrist. Not to insult podiatrists, but in instances when your dealing with alleged alien implantation and things such as these youd need an expert with a bit more knowledge then a podiatrist brings
originally posted by: HanaDambi
I believe you are refering to Roger Leir? He IS a surgeon, he is a pediatric surgeon. What sort of knowledge should one have to remove implants that this guy doesn't have? He knows how to use x-rays, perform surgery & send the objects to a laboratory to have them analysed. What else does he need to know?
EDIT: He kinda is famous for removing supposed alien implants so they aren't really making him out to be famous or "reknown", when hes not.
P.S- It's spelt R-E-N-O-W-N
originally posted by: HanaDambi
a reply to: draknoir2
Yeah I know lol I remembered afterwards when i was away from my computer. Still doesn't change the fact he IS a surgeon.