It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Only 10 days Left-Until Predicted Huge Earthquakes

page: 30
71
<< 27  28  29    31  32  33 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 13 2008 @ 01:07 PM
link   
reply to post by questioningall
 


actually supermoons have had nothing to do with earthquakes. earthquakes always happen. i have personally checked the dates on supermoons and even Ultra-moons and can honesty tell you that no earthquake of significane (7.0 or higher) happened on those days. earthquakes did happen but nothing large scale.



posted on Dec, 13 2008 @ 01:15 PM
link   
reply to post by Naturally Smooth
 


Comrad "Naturally Smooth" in reply to your comments on page 28 it sounds like you yourself do actually make unjustified attacks.

Did you do more googling like I suggested, in order to find out the truth? No you didn't.

You state I don't represent a Russian Scientist very well. Please show us how your small brain comes up with such self proclaimed evidence.

You can't believe "they" were ever a geologist. Where did your sized brain come up with the word "they". I'm an individual, and I was a geologist.

We can see what you believe in, you believe in attacking people that you have no right to attack. My earthquake detection system must be real, I look at it quite often, and it has never been incorrect. You on the other hand are very incorrect.



posted on Dec, 13 2008 @ 01:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by questioningall
Today being Dec. 1st - there are only 10 days left until the time frame of Dec. 10 -15th of 2 Huge (maybe biggest ever) Earthquakes to hit the U.S. and then somewhere else in the world.


So um... I have a question...
When nothing happens on the 15th, will this 'time frame' be expanded, or will the 'threat' be over for good?



posted on Dec, 13 2008 @ 01:20 PM
link   
Listen i can predict anything i want!!! And it allways comes true!

I predict that they will be an earthquake in the next 100 years!

I predict it will rain within the UK in the next 100 years!

I predict we will travel to the Moon and Mars within the next 100 years!

I predict they will be millions of other predictions within the next 100 years!

Within the 100 years remember not over it and starting right NOW!!

I bet am right!

Am allways right!!! Why do you think am allways right??????



posted on Dec, 13 2008 @ 01:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by kattraxx

As Jim Berkland 's biographer, good friend...I am going to say that this is a rumor. I do not believe he would have said an 8.0 quake would be the result this month. Look at his forecast. Once again, after posting the below post I will post Berkland's Dec. eq forecast. Also, he forecasts for 4 regions every month; he will make a MOSS prediction sometimes but I doubt that he forecasted such a quake/mag...He is gone till Dec. 19...so no way to know for sure. But I seriously doubt he'd predict a great quake in this manner. Oh, and working with him on The Man Who Predicts Earthquakes...he would never say "heavenly bodies'" or a "series of 8 plus megaquakes."


www.websitetoolbox.com...

So, Cal's telling me this is BS. And she promptly posted it in her forum. How about a little more substance and less hysteria? Attributing false quotes to someone like Jim Berkland, I doubt, will go unnoticed.


[edit on 12/13/08 by kattraxx]


Thanks for checking on this, kattraxx. Like I said before, I had looked all over the web, and on his website, sysygy and couldn't find a thing at all that said he had actually predicted this, either.

Glad you have some connections, there




posted on Dec, 13 2008 @ 01:45 PM
link   
reply to post by Red Cloak
 


Comrad "Red Cloak" it is very kind that you put up such a controversial statement from Jim Berkland. As you state on pg 28 that he told you that there is an 85% chance that there will be one or more magnitude 8 earthquakes within 2-3 weeks after December 12, 2008 in the area of New Madrid.

This man needs to have his head checked if he made such statements; and in fact no scientist in their right mind would make such a statement as this without some scientific fact.

These are the scientific facts people. Jim Berkland makes "MANY" earthquake predictions, and yes he did get "ONE" right. But the only reason he got the "one" right is because of only "one" scientific reason. That scientific reason is the scientific fact that porpoises, dolphins and whales beach themselves trying to get away from faults under abnormal pressure.

So, if you want to know if and where a large earthquake is going to strike somewhere around the world close to the ocean, then scour the web for porpoises, dolphins and whales beaching themselves right before it strikes, because they are good scientific indicators, whilest other animals, reptiles, fish and mammals are not.

Jim Berkland saw the news article that the whales or dolphins or porpoises were beaching themselves at that period in time, and that is how he made his prediction. You can be fairly right also, after you see such beachings.

On the other hand, Jim Berkland uses moon phases an all that kind of BS, and that stuff has nothing to do with an earthquake. When you start getting all of your scientific data from the Earth itself, then you will have real scientific data.

Porpoises, dolphins, and whales that beach themselves are able to detect faults under abnormal pressure. I'm sure they must see it as some type of very extensive radiation wall that is pulsing up and down inside the water and above it, as I see it when I use my equipment that lets me be able to see it; or they simply don't like the signal and from past experience know that a quake usually follows.

As to Jim Berkland making a statement like the one stated, his entire forecast of such an event is totally preposterous and should not be heeded by anyone. Why? Because he has no scientific data from the earth showing any kind of pulsing coming from the ground showing that a huge earthquake is going to strike near New Madrid as stated.

I'm watching the region between Denver to Memphis, and Dallas to Pierre; and there is currently no signal in the ground showing any type of large earthquake looming in that region for the next three days; and yes I did just check the equipment and there is no signal of any huge earthquake ready to strike the New Madrid fault within the next three days. SO....

Fear Not, because there will NOT be a huge earthquake on the New Madrid fault within 3 days from today.



posted on Dec, 13 2008 @ 01:45 PM
link   
reply to post by TSOM87
 

A time parameter of a hundred years is not too impressive,especially since none of us is likely to care by then.Calling it to the week IS.To the day?Minute?You could expect your life to change if you did that.It would pay well.Work on it.Sounds like your calling.
For me,no money in the world would compensate me for the knowledge that I predicted an EQ and it happened and I felt somehow responsible because I wished it so to gratify my Id(ego).I would agonize over every death and story of loss and woe.Or if I didn't speak up.The animals ARE acting screwy...



posted on Dec, 13 2008 @ 01:56 PM
link   
When has a Prediction ever came true? I find it hard to believe this stuff. Someone show me a prediction that has been made and has came true! Remember it has to be on the time that it was predicted to be, not a week after it happened or before!

All so has there ever been a WebBot prediction on ATS before and it has came true?



posted on Dec, 13 2008 @ 01:59 PM
link   
So, the time frame was the tenth to fifteenth.
Which means we only have two days left, doesn't it?

Which means,


THE END IS NIGH



posted on Dec, 13 2008 @ 02:11 PM
link   
Chickenshoes, Cal Orey wrote the book about Jim Berkland. She maintains his web site when he's out of town, answers his e-mail, etc. And he is out of town now. Jim Berkland is very well known, and has a reputation to protect and I don't think he will be too happy about this.

[edit on 12/13/08 by kattraxx]



posted on Dec, 13 2008 @ 02:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by RussianScientists
[Porpoises, dolphins, and whales that beach themselves are able to detect faults under abnormal pressure. I'm sure they must see it as some type of very extensive radiation wall that is pulsing up and down inside the water and above it, as I see it when I use my equipment that lets me be able to see it; or they simply don't like the signal and from past experience know that a quake usually follows.


Comrad,

I've seen you post at length on here claiming many things and providing absolutely no proof of your statements. All the while stating that the web bot predictions have no scientific data to back them up. You claim to have equipment that no one else has, yet we have no evidence of such equipment. Now you make claims about whales beaching themselves due to them seeing fault pressures as some sort of extensive radiation...so PROOVE IT! Whales beach themselves for many reasons, and as of yet, scientists who actually study this behavior are not 100% sure why it happens. This list of theories for why whales beach themselves includes being injured, sick, old, getting entangled in fishing nets, swimming in pods and following the leader onto the beach. Other examples include changes in the weather (which could affect food supply), having problems navigating by sound, undersea topography, or sunlight, and following magetic field lines into shorelines. And finally, military sonar could be disorientating them. These are all listed in the article at Physorg.com, but nowhere does it mention anything about undersea fault pressures causing some sort of undersea radiation wall. Please provide proof of these statements.



I'm watching the region between Denver to Memphis, and Dallas to Pierre; and there is currently no signal in the ground showing any type of large earthquake looming in that region for the next three days; and yes I did just check the equipment and there is no signal of any huge earthquake ready to strike the New Madrid fault within the next three days. SO....

Fear Not, because there will NOT be a huge earthquake on the New Madrid fault within 3 days from today.


You continue to say this, offering us no proof of your equipment, giving us a window of 3 days. And if no earthquake happens in that time, you look like you know what you are talking about right? Wrong. Because the chances are small, minisculely small, that a huge earthquake would strike the New Madrid area in the next 3 days, prediction or not. Why? Because there hasn't been a major one to strike there in 100 years or so. So, IMO, your 3 day assertion that nothing will happen in the New Madrid area isn't really stepping out on a limb. In fact, it's about as safe a statement as one could make! Besides, the web bot run mentioned that New Madrid could possibly be one of the fault zones within the 32-36 degree latitude, not that it was the only one. The interpretation of the Time Monks also listed California, Turkey, Kashmir, and China as other major fault zones which lie inside the latitude range which could be the source of the quakes. So, if you want to impress me with your knowledge, then step out on a real limb or provide some proof of your statements. Otherwise, it's all bunk to me.



posted on Dec, 13 2008 @ 04:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by holoverse




[edit on 13-12-2008 by holoverse]


Where did you get this image? Did you create it? I find the whole antipode aspect very interesting and would appreciate if you could elaborate or share a source. I cannot U2U as I am a newer poster on ATS.

Thanks.



posted on Dec, 13 2008 @ 04:43 PM
link   
The fertile plain and seeds can refer to California area or New Madrid in the Arkansas/Mississippi areas. Dancing mountains has me wondering though. California of course has mountains but I've been searching for references to dancing mountains and it seems most come back with locations in Washington.

This would seem to indicate that maybe the dancing mountains aspect refers to the Pacific Northwest quake that is due.



posted on Dec, 13 2008 @ 07:23 PM
link   
Science is supposed to be objective. How could one possibly justify an earthquake-predictor that has people interpret the results?



posted on Dec, 13 2008 @ 08:07 PM
link   
reply to post by Evil Genius
 


Comrad "Evil Genius" I hear where you are coming from, you are a person after my own heart. I'm always, and I mean always wanting to see the science behind stuff myself. Many times getting to see such stuff that others have is not possible unless their price is paid in order to see it; and yes I have a set price currently at this moment which is cheap for what all is offered.

But to get TRADE SECRETS for free is impossible. Coca Cola has trade secrets and no one can force anyone to give away their trade secrets, so... I'm sorry, but at this point in time you cannot have all my knowledge, but I will share more, because you have raised some important points and I do like sharing none-the-less; especially with people that have good intentions, and I see you do have good intentions.

First of all I'm sure you realize that the Web Bot isn't scientific when it comes to predicting earthquakes, so we shall not go any further there.

It would be pretty hard for me to give you total proof, unless I was willing to give up my trade secrets, and I won't do that, and neither will Coca Colar or any other entity or person, that has something worthwhile, that is secretly held.

Whales, porpoises and dolphins have many times been noted as beaching themselves right before a large earthquake. The problem with you is that you don't realize that there are earthquake cells that don't quake, and the proof that I will give you is the fact that "the Big Foot Project" I think that is what it is called, has noted this stuff from satelites out in Earths orbit, but since they aren't connected to the ground and can't detect all of the pulses and cycles, then they don't collect all of the data that my equipment is capable of. They can see the Earth swelling up in places and then going back into place, but not all of these places that swell up actually turn into eartquakes. My equipment can detect this swelling up and gentle release.

Furthermore, I discovered radiation eminating from these faults under abnormal pressure, and this radiation pulses up and down directly over the fault under pressure. Sometimes it goes down into the ground, but lots of the time it is detectable at or just above the horizon, no matter which direction you are from it.

The radiation is detectable from incredibly long distances and not much stops the penetration of these high energy particles. After I turn on my equipment and power it up, I can see such radiation; which means, that more-than-likely those particular mammals can see it also or they would not be killing themselves just before large earthquakes strike; and... sometimes when they kill themselves and no earthquake has struck, it is probably because a large earthquake cell existed, but did not turn into a common earthquake. In the interior of the USA there are far more earthquake cells than there are earthquakes.

So, if I can see that stuff, then they can see it also, I'm that sure of it. It would probably be a scary sight for them, because they have probably heard the screams of their own species dieing on the beaches during this particular time of this strange sight which is incredible to behold.

So, probably in the future after the world knows about this equipment and how its used, lots of nice people all over the world will be on the beaches while massive earthquake cells are detectable; they will be waiting to see if any mammals are coming into beach themselves, and they will save many mammals lives in the future, by knowing why they are there, and where they should be transported to if possible in order for the mammals to not to go into confusion and kill themselves during this period of time. Faults under abnormal pressure probably mess up their own built in compasses.

Why do I give you a window of three days? Well, I have to do that, because that is all I believe I can allow, from this distance. I'm pretty much centered in the middle of the area I've described. Furthermore, I'm fairly close to a fault that gives off distant information since it is linked to the West Coast of the USA.

So... from this location, I can watch everything between Denver to Memphis, and everything from Dallas to Pierre; and I can track what is going on 50 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean, from the Mexico/USA border to the border between Oregon/Washington.

So far there is no signal or no visual radiation that would show a huge earthquake cell exists in the above paragraphs noted areas; therefore, NO huge earthquake will strike in those areas within the next three days, I can guarantee you that.

My assertions aren't stepping out on the limb, only because past scientific data proves it to be correct; otherwise, yes I would be more than stepping out on a limb. But, what I have stated is real.

That is about all I can tell you, so you can take it or leave it; because you will never know for sure until you really see the system work, and I understand that perfectly, that is only to be expected; because I would be the same way if I were in your shoes.



posted on Dec, 14 2008 @ 02:31 AM
link   
reply to post by questioningall
 


Ok, this prediction with severe winter weather is creepy accurate!
I get a cold running down my spine... If the two earthquakes will indeed happen this December I will never again question webbot predictions and start preparing for 2012!!!



posted on Dec, 14 2008 @ 02:50 AM
link   
In reply to Russian scientist.

I can track what is going on 50 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean, from the Mexico/USA border to the border between Oregon/Washington.

Wouldn't this put you out of range then of the juan de fuca plate? And that in many eyes could be one of the next areas a huge devastating quake come from. I'm not sure but I would think the southern most part of that plate also known as the gorda plate would be close to the area given in the predictions.

I'm not saying I believe in the web bots predictions but based on the above, couldn't you be wrong in saying that no major earthquake will happen in the next 3 days in the US?

Also you say all that all these others are wrong and only you are right about EQ predictions. Can you show us proof of a prediction you have gotten correct? Can you tell us of a quake in the us in the upcoming future, would you if you could?

[edit on 14-12-2008 by whoshotJR]



posted on Dec, 14 2008 @ 04:46 AM
link   
Wow Check out the USGS there was a 5.0 in the middle of africa... THERE is no fault lines in the middle of africa.



posted on Dec, 14 2008 @ 05:05 AM
link   
For what it's worth ,I 've just been talikng to my son in Japan on MSN and there was an earthquake in the middle of our conversation.Here are the stats for the earthquake heads;



swww.jma.go.jp...


He said it felt like the house had been rugby tackled.He's ok though ,only a 4.5...my poor baby!LOL
Interseting stuff op ,keep up the good work



posted on Dec, 14 2008 @ 05:05 AM
link   
Lake Tanganyika is the area of that african quake. There are volcanoe's all around. The Lake is the deepest in the world.

Source


he East African Rift, (Western branch) The western rift is a great graben which extends for 750 miles from L. Albert to L Tanganyika and beyond through L. Nyasa. About 100 miles west of Lake Victoria within the main Rift Zone are three areas of most remarkable potassic volcanics. North of Lake Edward is the Ruwenzori Range and the Toro Ankole province. A little further south between L. Edward and Lake Kivu is an area variously described as the Bufumbira, the Virunga or Birunga or Lake Kivu province. It includes several active and dormant cones, Nyamuragira, Nyiragongo, (11,380 ft), Karisimbi, (14,850ft), Mikeno (14,700ft), Visoki and Muhavura. Nyiragongo especially, has been subject to much attention because of a pit crater within a 3,600ft deep caldera with an active lava lake. This appeared in 1928 but in 1977 a flank emission of lava drained the lake killing 70 people. Since 1982 the lava lake has built up again.


Where there are volcano's there will be quakes.

What's' most worrying is how shallow it was. A shallow quake results in heavier shaking and more likelyhood of damage/death/destruction.



new topics

top topics



 
71
<< 27  28  29    31  32  33 >>

log in

join