It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ProfEmeritus
reply to post by mybigunit
Actually, that was a fairly predictable decision. Zbigniew Brzezinski is a huge supporter of Gates, and of course, Zbigniew Brzezinski was also the person behind the scenes "guiding" the candidacy of Obama. Brzezinski's grand scheme is playing out just the way he wants it.
Still doesnt change my opinion of Obama. He isnt about change. He is another government tool. None of these sons a B# are about change. Gates is corrupt I mean hell he worked for Bush. We had no choice last election or any election for that matter.
Brzezinski's grand scheme is playing out just the way he wants it.
Originally posted by jam321
reply to post by ProfEmeritus
Brzezinski's grand scheme is playing out just the way he wants it.
My amigo, could you elaborate some more on this.
Seeing that Gates currently know the in and outs of what is going on in Iraq and Afghanistan, I think this is the best choice Obama could have made. At least there will be some stability until Obama starts to make policy changes. Those changes could take awhile due to the current economic fiasco.
Originally posted by jd140
Originally posted by jam321
reply to post by ProfEmeritus
Brzezinski's grand scheme is playing out just the way he wants it.
My amigo, could you elaborate some more on this.
Seeing that Gates currently know the in and outs of what is going on in Iraq and Afghanistan, I think this is the best choice Obama could have made. At least there will be some stability until Obama starts to make policy changes. Those changes could take awhile due to the current economic fiasco.
Those changes could take a while? How long are Obama supporters going to wait? LOL I can see it now, Obama/Biden 2012 Changes are coming I promise.
My amigo, could you elaborate some more on this.
In 1973, David Rockefeller asked Zbigniew Brzezinski to put together an organization of the top political, and business leaders from around the World. He called this group the Trilateral Commission (TC).
....skip to.....
"In 1970 a young Polish intellectual named Zbigniew Brzezinski foresaw the rising economic power of Japan, and postwar Europe. Brzezinski idealized the theories of Karl Marx. In his book, Between Two Ages, as in subsequent writings, he argued that balance-of-power politics was out, and world-order politics was in. The initial world order was to be a trilateral economic linkage between Japan, Europe, and the United States. David Rockefeller funded Brzezinski, and called together an organization, named the Trilateral Commission, with Brzezinski as its first executive secretary, and director.
The Trilateral Commission—one of the three most powerful globalist groups in the world—held closed-door meetings right here in Washington, D.C. from April 25 to 28. True to form, those members of the media who knew about the meeting—or were themselves participants in the proceedings—refused to discuss what went on inside or report on the attendees. Luckily, AFP’s own editor, Jim Tucker, was on the scene to bust this clandestine confabulation wide open.
Luminaries at the Trilateral Commission meeting in Washington expressed confidence that they own all three major presidential candidates, who, despite political posturing, will support sovereignty-surrendering measures such as NAFTA and the “North American Union.”
The second item of interest this morning was titled “The New Feudalism” by Moss David Posner. David postulates in this essay that Americans have a disconnect to reality that has been carefully groomed over the years to make them susceptible to things that they would normally not accept. He goes on to conclude,
The current crop of international criminals wishes to reduce the world to one large feudal system. Such a notion endured for many centuries before. Could they really believe such is possible? Could they really pull it off? In this last regard, history does not speak in our favor.
Standing Orders for the Next President
According to James Tucker,
This panel [Trilateral Commission] had these orders for the next president: increase foreign aid across the board because “America does not pay its fair share,” pay up the arrears in UN dues, allow as many immigrants into the United States as want to come and provide “amnesty” for illegal aliens already here.
The Trilateral Commission members concluded that the only real danger is Ron Paul.
They expressed concern that Paul’s rallies have attracted multitudes of young people who are getting “their political education.” They want Republicans to pressure Paul to drop out now and stop his education rallies. This assignment was given to Thomas Foley, former U.S. House speaker. (Tucker, 2008)
Originally posted by jam321
reply to post by jd140
Don't know. I didn't vote for Obama. All I can tell you is that I keep hearing this word prioritize. Right now Iraq and Afghanistan is pretty stable. As long as they are stable Obama can focus on other pressing issues.
Originally posted by Sestias
Obama was elected three weeks ago. He won't be inaugurated until January 20. What kind of changes do you expect before then?
Gates was a surprising choice, but he is both competent and knowledgeable in his area of expertise. Obama has said he wants to have Republicans in his administration, too, so this is an example of his bipartisanship. I don't think this appointment says anything about Obama's commitment to withdrawal from Iraq. Gates will be working for a new boss now, so you can't assume he will continue Bush's policies.
It may not be possible or advisable to withdraw from Iraq too quickly. We don't have access to the president's briefings on foreign affairs, so we don't know exactly how we would do it.
It's obvious most of you are determined to undermine Obama and never intended to give him a chance.
Originally posted by jam321
reply to post by ProfEmeritus
Brzezinski's grand scheme is playing out just the way he wants it.
My amigo, could you elaborate some more on this.
Seeing that Gates currently know the in and outs of what is going on in Iraq and Afghanistan, I think this is the best choice Obama could have made. At least there will be some stability until Obama starts to make policy changes. Those changes could take awhile due to the current economic fiasco.
Originally posted by Sestias
Obama was elected three weeks ago. He won't be inaugurated until January 20. What kind of changes do you expect before then?
Gates was a surprising choice, but he is both competent and knowledgeable in his area of expertise. Obama has said he wants to have Republicans in his administration, too, so this is an example of his bipartisanship. I don't think this appointment says anything about Obama's commitment to withdrawal from Iraq. Gates will be working for a new boss now, so you can't assume he will continue Bush's policies.
It may not be possible or advisable to withdraw from Iraq too quickly. We don't have access to the president's briefings on foreign affairs, so we don't know exactly how we would do it.
It's obvious most of you are determined to undermine Obama and never intended to give him a chance.
Originally posted by Sestias
Gates will be working for a new boss now, so you can't assume he will continue Bush's policies.
Originally posted by sos37
You have to to remember what Obama campaigned on most of the time - that he would make it a priority to brings the troops home immediately.
So what is your message to all Obama supporters who voted for him based on the Iraq war being their number one concern and wanting the troops brought home?