It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jamie83
I was just curious if anybody could answer this...
Democrats seem to have an incessant need to break us down into groups, and then try to position themselves as being able to solve a particular group's problems.
They have all these issues on their web sites:
gay issues
lesbian issues
transgender issues
black issues
hispanic issues
women's issues
organized labor issues
etc..
The ultimate example of this may have been when Nancy Pelosi was trying to push through the resolution condemning Turkey for its alleged genocide of Armenians between 1915-1923. Have we really gone this far that the Dems have to break things down into having resolution for Armenians because of something that happened in 1923?
On the other hand, the Republicans seem to focus on issues for the country overall...
Strong military and defense
Smaller government
Lower taxes
less regulation
etc.
So why do you think this is? Why do Democrats seem to focus on group politics and Republicans focus on issues common to everybody?
The Problem
A 20th Century Structure for 21st Century Problems: We have inherited a national security structure that was developed and organized in the late 1940s to win the Cold War. It remains a rigid bureaucracy of government agencies, relying upon a restrictive and disconnected set of legal authorities.
New Leadership and Vision is Needed: America simply cannot afford more of the old approach to our national defense. Instead, it needs a Commander-in-Chief with the right combination of judgment, vision, and leadership for the 21st century.
A Military Under Strain: Currently, our soldiers, seamen, airmen and Marines are deployed around the globe, working valiantly to defend our nation. Yet, these heroes are under-resourced and asked to do too much by a policy that has too often taken their sacrifice for granted. Due to their incredible courage and ingenuity, they persevere, but at incredible cost to themselves and their families.
Recruitment and Retention Problems: A country of 300 million strong should not struggle to find enough qualified citizens to serve. Recruiting and retention problems have been swept under the rug by an administration that does not understand the value of service to our nation.
A System Not Serving our Troops as Well as They Serve Us: As the shameful events at Walter Reed Army Medical Center and the recent reports on growing numbers of homeless and unemployed veterans show, we simply are not taking proper care of our wounded warriors and veterans.
Barack Obama's Plan.
Originally posted by mhc_70
reply to post by mental modulator
Why do you believe he will do all those things in that op-ed piece?
Has he done similar things before that show a pattern for those policies?
The only pattern I see is..."its what America wants to hear".
* Create a Credit Card Rating System to Improve Disclosure: Obama will create a credit card rating system, modeled on five-star systems used for other consumer products, to provide consumers an easily identifiable ranking of credit cards, based on the card's features. Credit card companies will be required to display the rating on all application and contract materials, enabling consumers to quickly understand all of the major provisions of a credit card without having to rely exclusively on fine print in lengthy documents.
.
Originally posted by mental modulator
Originally posted by mhc_70
reply to post by mental modulator
Why do you believe he will do all those things in that op-ed piece?
Has he done similar things before that show a pattern for those policies?
The only pattern I see is..."its what America wants to hear".
I am posting Obamas platform...
Originally posted by jamie83
I was just curious if anybody could answer this...
They have all these issues on their web sites:
gay issues
lesbian issues
transgender issues
black issues
hispanic issues
women's issues
organized labor issues
etc..
Originally posted by mhc_70
Originally posted by mental modulator
Originally posted by mhc_70
reply to post by mental modulator
Why do you believe he will do all those things in that op-ed piece?
Has he done similar things before that show a pattern for those policies?
The only pattern I see is..."its what America wants to hear".
I am posting Obamas platform...
Unless you can answer the questions I will be forced to believe you are just a sheep who is following his Messiah.
Originally posted by mental modulator
Think what you'd like... I could care less.
Read thats all I can tell you.
Originally posted by sputniksteve
Mental Modulator, just so you know I reported you for spamming that mess in the thread trying to derail the discussion. Cut and Paste does not make you intelligent.
They have all these issues on their web sites:
gay issues
lesbian issues
transgender issues
black issues
hispanic issues
women's issues
organized labor issues
etc..
Originally posted by jamie83
On the other hand, the Republicans seem to focus on issues for the country overall...
Strong military and defense
Smaller government
Lower taxes
less regulation
etc.
Things have been getting worse recently. In the first five years of the Bush regime, federal spending increased 45%. Readers of Mises.org may remember that they were warned about Bush's fiscal irresponsibility before he took office. For comparison's sake, during the eight Clinton years nominal federal spending increased 32%, and under Bush I federal spending increased 23% in four years. In the 2000 election, Bush II promised to shovel money into all sorts of programs — and he's kept that promise.
Source
As recently as 2000, only about one million taxpayers owed the alternative minimum tax, created by a provision in the federal tax code that is supposed to prevent multimillionaires from using loopholes to avoid paying their fair share. But by the time Americans file their 2005 taxes, some 3 million taxpayers will owe the alternative tax and by 2010, nearly 30 million taxpayers will be hit - among them, a staggering 94 percent of married filers who have children and make $75,000 to $100,000.
Big families in high-tax states - New York, New Jersey, California and Massachusetts - will bear the heaviest burden, largely because the alternative tax increasingly disallows write-offs for dependents, state income taxes and local property taxes. On average, by 2010, people who make under $100,000 and owe the alternative tax will pay an additional $1,321 in federal income taxes, while alternative tax payers who make between $100,000 and $200,000 will owe an additional $2,592.
Originally posted by jamie83
Democrats seem to have an incessant need to break us down into groups, and then try to position themselves as being able to solve a particular group's problems.