Best cases - Rockefeller Briefing Document

Tremendous effort in presenting this material in such a detailed yet concise manner, s&f.

The whole sorry episode of this report does seem to be a sad analogy of so much within the UFO field in general. I'm not clear as to whether the original report was intended to be a private briefing document for Rockerfeller himself or that the intent from the beggining was for it to be disseminated in influential circles ?

That was amazing! It is posts like this that remind me why I am addicted to ATS. The transfer of knowledge around here is simply amazing. Flagged, Starred and Applause! Well deserved.

Thanks for the further kind remarks about my article about the Rockefeller Briefing Document.

I've now posted an extremely closely related article:
Best cases - National Enquirer Panel

The two articles should be read in conjunction.

Put together, I think they present a fairly depressing picture about the ability of UFO groups to effectively put forward the case for a serious study of UFO reports...

Kind Regards,

Isaac

reply to post by IsaacKoi


Good heavens IsaacKoi, it is that I see it on the screen, because otherwise I would not believe that magnificent posts like this one and not to forget your other posts “the top 100 UFO Cases – Revealed” and “Best cases - National Enquirer Panel” good be possible. and flggd and strrd.

Normally I advise people who are interested in good solid information about the Ufo-phenomenon to take a look into some specific sites of where I think of that they provide solid evidence.
But from now on I give them the links to your very valuable and useful treads here on ATS.
This must have cost you some time and searching, so thanks for all your work, I really appreciate it.

Salute from the Netherlands.

Spacevisitor


[edit on 1/4/08 by spacevisitor]

[edit on 1/4/08 by spacevisitor]

GREAT WORK! This will keep my busy for a while once I can dive fully in to it all.

I do have a comment on Dr. Greer however. I know others that have met him and I have as well met him. He is an interesting charactor and I must admit had he brought out his own ET involvement at the beginning of his disclosure it would have helped him rather than detracted as seems to be the case with many. My point about him I wanted to make is that in the beginning he was being funded by The Rockefeller Foundation. For me I have mixed feelings about the Rockefeller's as a whole. I think they truly want information to get out, but what is the real cost behind it for them?

Easy goes it and just be careful has been my feelings about Greer and Rockefeller's.

Rockefeller knows about Tesla for sure if he knows about UFOs.

He just won't tell us.

Saucers use no oil products except for some turbine bearings.

He is not a how rich am I for dummies reader for nothing.

The more nothing about UFOs he can print the better his chances are
to stay rich and why when the time came Tesla had to go.

Bet he knows about Tesla's death and Roswell too.
He has the money to find out the truth.

Did JP Morgan pay for Edison to power Niagara Falls, no he
researched AC power and had to go with Tesla.
JP Morgan found out the truth and saw behind Edison's lies.

reply to post by IsaacKoi


Hats off to you buddy. You have really done a fine piece of work here. It will probably take me the rest of my life to read the entirety of it. But I intend to chip away at it. Very interesting indeed. Thanks.

Mighty fine work Isaac and the Rockefeller Briefing Document realy does make for some very eyeopening reading.

The I.S.S.O. link is also a very interesting one.

web.archive.org...

Cheers!

reply to post by IsaacKoi


My main concern with this is that it is a very real possibility Rockefeller wishes to direct the various networks to align with the agenda against the public seeing the phenomena as a benevolent one, or one which humanity is ready to discover at this time. Is Rockefeller only in connection to the malevolent ones? Is this their way of protecting humanity? Maybe?

A PDF document containing the ENTIRE text and photos of the briefing document has recently been put online (with the permission of the groups behind the book): HERE.

Edit - mmm, that links seems to have (nolink) replaced with "nolink" for some reason.

Originally posted by IsaacKoi

A PDF document containing the ENTIRE text and photos of the briefing document has recently been put online (with the permission of the groups behind the book): HERE.

Edit - mmm, that links seems to have (nolink) replaced with "nolink" for some reason.

Isaac, don't think ATS likes Openminds anymore - your APRO bulletin links have also been disabled.


APRO Bulletins (historical UFO journals) now online free


Don't know the reasoning behind this but here's a good video on the Rockefeller UFO Initiative from Antonio Huneeus.

The first in our series is the “UFO Briefing Document: The Best Available Evidence.” This document was funded completely by Lawrance Rockefeller, and was part of the so-called Rockefeller UFO Initiative. Antonio Huneeus had the opportunity to work on it in the mid-nineties. It contains a concise case history report of major worldwide UFO events from the 1940s to the 1990s. A thorough analysis of major government funded studies is included, along with quoted testimony from prominent worldwide governments, military officials, scientists, and astronauts. Given the global impact of this phenomenon, the document presents major international agreements and resolutions on the topic.

Cheers.

Originally posted by karl 12
Isaac, don't think ATS likes Openminds anymore - your APRO bulletin links have also been disabled.

Thanks Karl.

Looking at this thread again (apparently written 5 years ago, even thought I think of it as one of my relatively recent pieces...), I realise that my style has changed quite a bit in the last few years. I now post more videos and photos to break up the "wall of text" and help make my longer threads more digestible.

Given the change in my style, and the fact that some links are out of date (plus the fact that I'd want to add quite a bit more information and several more comments on related issues now), makes me tempted to spend a few hours/days revamping the original item and posting it again as a new substantially revised thread.

I don't know if recycling (and improving) old material would be welcomed on ATS or just seen as a waste of time...

Originally posted by IsaacKoi

Given the change in my style, and the fact that some links are out of date (plus the fact that I'd want to add quite a bit more information and several more comments on related issues now), makes me tempted to spend a few hours/days revamping the original item and posting it again as a new substantially revised thread.

I don't know if recycling (and improving) old material would be welcomed on ATS or just seen as a waste of time...

Am pretty confident that would be welcomed mate - along with the new info and improved format, I think more members than not would be very interested in reading a revised and updated thread.

As you mention there are also quite a few vids out there to include -here's a relevant one from page 75 of the RBD regarding the Official Night of UFOs in Brazil




The 1957 U.S. sighting wave in November also now contains so many witness descriptions of 'strange egg-shaped object with no wings, tail, or fuselage' reports that it's not even funny anymore (link).

Cheers!