It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
1. They are in space, this video you have is not.
Dr. Rick Rairden of Lockheed Martin installs a low-resolution slit-less meteor spectrograph in front of the aircraft window during the August 13, 2007, Perseid test flight. The camera is optimized for near-UV spectroscopy, and tests at what wavelength the aircraft window becomes opaque.
Astronaut: "Well the long line is the tether um and there is a little bit of debris that ah kind of flies with us - and it's illuminated by the sun...."
Is there dust in space?
Originally posted by redshirt0202
But I think that I can safely say that the UFOs in the STS-75 footage were nothing more than lens artifacts.
Originally posted by The Lizard King
They couldn't have been airy disk lense artifacts because the pass BEHIND the tether. Articles of the lense, lense flares, or airy disks, whatever you want to call them, would not pass BEHIND the tether.
If it's small particles of dust on the lens,the only way i could see it appearing to be behind the teather,is that if the light being reflected from the tether,is more powerful than from the dust,giving the appearence of going behind it. Where the sun is,isn't clear in this footage,I think that could also hold a bearing on it. But these things shouldn't change direction and speed on their own. if it was thrusters or something,then you'd expect al the material to act the same way,as it's so small,and so close together.
Originally posted by Breadfan
Originally posted by The Lizard King
They couldn't have been airy disk lense artifacts because the pass BEHIND the tether. Articles of the lense, lense flares, or airy disks, whatever you want to call them, would not pass BEHIND the tether.
I agree. Someone explain this? If those were lens artefacts, how the heck can they show up behind the tether? This alone, if true, proves the theory wrong.