Evidence: Obama not Gay Coke Head: Sinclair Lied!

Evidence: Obama not Gay Coke Head: Accuser Lied!

www.wnd.com

WASHINGTON – The Minnesota man who accused leading presidential candidate Barack Obama of coc aine use and having sex with him in the back of a limousine nine years ago has reportedly failed two polygraph tests administered by the website WhiteHouse.com.

(visit the link for the full news article)

Related News Links:
www.whitehouse.com

Related AboveTopSecret.com Discussion Threads:
www.abovepolitics.com...

[edit on 25-2-2008 by Buck Division]

After all the fuss about this in PTS, I'm surprised nobody posted this article, which looks like it clears Obama.

My original thought, that Larry Sinclair was delusional, mentally ill, and suffering from erotomania -- just didn't pan out. I guess the truth is much simpler. Larry Sinclair is just lying, intending to smear Obama with a vicious and false rumor. So it appears now, anyway. What a surprise!

I never could imagine, in a million years, I would ever say this: Good work WhiteHouse.com!

www.wnd.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

Edit: Excellent. One less thing to worry about.

[edit on 25-2-2008 by Buck Division]

Good post, I've been waiting for this guy to take the polygraph test,,,,so now it's official, he failed not once but twice.

The people who have been posting this rumour will probably not bother to read these facts nor will they care, as they continue to post the same false story, but under another heading!

Starred and flagged

Got another source?
This site claims to be "mentioned on ALL the major News networks"
In a way, thats true.
For most of it's life, it was a porn site. and thats why all the mentions by the networks. It was Very controversial. Because school kids, looking for information on the government, would very often end up at this .COM domain, instead of the .gov.. So yes, they have been mentioned on the news a few times..LOL!

It was also a search engine site, then a real estate site. And now it claims to be a news site..with this claim at the top:

We are Celebrating our 11th Year of Excellence (1997-2008)

They neglect to mention that most of those years, they were serving up Pornography.

Can you attach a lie detector to a website?

I should mention that it's current incarnation..a "news" site, has only been in existence for a very short time (months). Perhaps to write "credible" news items on behalf of whomever.

[edit on 25-2-2008 by spacedoubt]

I'm glad I'm not the only one... "whitehouse.com ... what?!"

I tried to register that in 1998 back in the day when harassing the White House (and the Vatican) was what us geeky kids did after school.
When I found it was already porn I declared, "Damnit. Bill beat me to it!"

Originally posted by spacedoubt
Got another source? For most of it's life, it (whitehouse.com) was a porn site. and thats why all the mentions by the networks.

I know what your saying Spacedoubt. The only corroborating news I can see is at World Net Daily.

Please understand; what happened is that "whitehouse.com" challenged Larry Sinclair to a lie detector test (in return for $10,000 USA) to verify his truthfulness, and he accepted. Now it looks like Sinclair failed these tests. Both of them. WhiteHouse.com is the prime source of this info. They are the ones who managed the lie detector tests.

So the current situation is that we have two sleazy websites addressing a sleazy story. I really doubt any of this will ever be touched by the mainstream media.

One other note I want to make. This isn’t great evidence that Obama action is NOT bisexual, or in particular, is NOT still a coc aine user. The speculation is out there. He should just address this. His campaign is all about hope and honesty and forthrightness.

Especially, I would like to see Obama very forcefully renounce illegal drugs, and detail his plan for the war on drugs. All the candidate's positions on this topic are here. Obama looks like he is on the correct side of this issue (in my opinion). I'd like to know more.

[edit on 25-2-2008 by Buck Division]

The polygraph proves nothing.

Personally, I don't believe the guy, but not because of the test.

Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
The polygraph proves nothing.

Personally, I don't believe the guy, but not because of the test.

It was Larry Sinclair and the folks at "Whitehouse.com" who indicated that they would use the polygraph....so he failed under his own system, not once but twice. Case Closed.

[edit on 25-2-2008 by realmatrix]

As Obama has said, "This is the start of the 'silly season' in politics." It looks like Sinclair is the beginning, but he won't be the end. I can imagine there will be all sorts of allegations about all of the candidates, like the one about McCain having an affair with a (female) lobbyist (he's kind of a boring guy, so the accusations would be mundane)--I'm a Democrat, but I doubt that one too. It never fails to amaze me how varied and colorful the allegations against Obama can be: he's theoretically a Muslim fundamentalist with jihad on his mind who's unpatriotic, uses some sort of weird magnestism to draw people under his spell, says absolutely nothing and is a gay crackhead. I hate to sound like a dupe of the MSM, but I'll believe it when I read it in the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal.

This thread is great, because it brings more light to this story. The accusation, as far as I'm concerned, still needs to be disproven.

Has Ron Paul ever used Coke?

I don't think so.

Originally posted by Sestias
I hate to sound like a dupe of the MSM, but I'll believe it when I read it in the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal.

Remember that it was the NYT that broke the story about McCain and left every reputable journalist in the country scratching his head.

It was the NYT that broke the story about the high numbers of war veterans who are involved in violent crime, but forgot to analyze the data which proved that veterans were about 85% less likely to commit violent crimes as compared to non-veterans in the same demographics.


[edit on 2008/2/26 by GradyPhilpott]

reply to post by Buck Division


uh...i posted this in the original thread about the claims that were made.

reply to post by spacedoubt


there's still the fact that it was a polygraph test. i'm quite sure that whoever was running it wasn't the person administering the test and the person making the claim doesn't seem to be objecting to the treatment...

Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
reply to post by Buck Division

 

uh...i posted this in the original thread about the claims that were made.

Thanks Mad. There are a couple of threads discussing this that I know of, below.

Obama's Gay Sex and Drug Abuse: Dirty Politics or the Truth?
Man claims he had cocain driven homosexual sex with Obama.

If you know of any other PTS threads associated with this topic, could you post a link? It's a hot topic, for sure. Lots of divergent opinions on this one (but only one right answer IMO!) I bet we haven't seen the last of this discussion, so there is likely to be even more threads coming soon.

[edit on 27-2-2008 by Buck Division]

what happened is that "whitehouse.com" challenged Larry Sinclair to a lie detector test (in return for $10,000 USA) to verify his truthfulness, and he accepted. Now it looks like Sinclair failed these tests. Both of them. WhiteHouse.com is the prime source of this info. They are the ones who managed the lie detector tests.

So who are the real suckers here, lol.

Originally posted by Sestias
It never fails to amaze me how varied and colorful the allegations against Obama can be: he's theoretically a Muslim fundamentalist with jihad on his mind who's unpatriotic, uses some sort of weird magnestism to draw people under his spell, says absolutely nothing and is a gay crackhead.

hahahahahaha! "Weird magnetism!" Absolutely priceless...excellent synopsis!

Let us not forget that he wants to make all small caliber handguns illegal and abolish national borders, as well.

And he bites the heads off kittens. And kicks old ladies, too.

I knew that guy was lying just because he's so singularly unattractive. Puh-leeze! If you're gonna pay someone for oral sex in a men's room (ewww! They smell so baddd!) surely there must be someone better looking available in a Chicago nightclub?!

Does coke-fiend Larry get to keep the 10K? Or was that based on the outcome of the polygraph?