It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ipsedixit
But here's another thing. Are there issues with regard to adults interracting with 13 year olds over the internet, exchanging views and arguing over many controversial issues? Do we have a responsibility to exclude people of a certain age from interaction in these forums on the grounds that it could be injurious to them emotionally, mentally, philosophically?
A 13 year old is not an adult. If this one had not announced his/her age anyone could make a different sort of assumption about him/her. Is there a problem here or am I just being silly?
[edit on 23-11-2007 by ipsedixit]
Originally posted by ipsedixit
I think if it were possible to adjust content for age on ATS it would be done. After all in virtually any other walk of life it is not considered desireable for young teenagers to mingle freely with adult strangers.
Originally posted by ipsedixit
As a literary type, I think the title was something of a "grabber." Are the moderators trying to improve my writing style here or is the word "fart" a little too pungeant for ATS? Whatever the case, we know that oversight and content adjustment goes on in these forums. In most cases the adjustments are fair.
I think if it were possible to adjust content for age on ATS it would be done. After all in virtually any other walk of life it is not considered desireable for young teenagers to mingle freely with adult strangers.
I don't know what the answers are. It is just a very difficult issue, for me.
Originally posted by Beachcoma
Personally I don't really see a problem. Some kids exhibit a surprising level of intellect and maturity for their age. Meanwhile some full grown adults with kids of they're own are just... sigh... mental age and actual age doesn't match, if you get my drift.
I'd say it's not the age, it's the maturity.
Originally posted by ipsedixit
Do we have a responsibility to exclude people of a certain age from interaction in these forums on the grounds that it could be injurious to them emotionally, mentally, philosophically?
Originally posted by Duzey My own personal opinion is that the current policy of not allowing content and behaviour that would make this site inappropriate for younger members is a far better approach than denying younger members the opportunity to share their views and expand their knowledge.