It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
This is the Government we are talking about. Does anyone really take anything they say at face value?
This invention has a phenomenal variety of possible ramifications and potential future developments. As alluded to earlier, missile or aircraft destruction, deflection, or confusion could result, particularly when relativistic particles are employed. Also, large regions of the atmosphere could be lifted to an unexpectedly high altitude so that missiles encounter unexpected and unplanned drag forces with resultant destruction or deflection of same.
Weather modification is possible by, for example, altering upper atmosphere wind patterns or altering solar absorption patterns by constructing one or more plumes of atmospheric particles which will act as a lens or focusing device.
For example, the plasma sheath surrounding a missile or satellite could be used as a trigger for activating such a high intensity field to destroy the missile or satellite.
Still further, plumes in accordance with the present invention can be formed to simulate and/or perform the same functions as performed by the detonation of a "heave" type nuclear device without actually having to detonate such a device. Thus it can be seen that the ramifications are numerous, far-reaching, and exceedingly varied in usefulness.
How much power does HAARP take from the power grid?
HAARP draws only housekeeping power, used for lighting, heating, and computers, from the local power grid. During research operations, the HAARP facility is taken off the local power grid completely
Originally posted by frozen_snowman
Great find etshrtslr
So.. now.. where does the electicity come from to to produce approximately 3.6 million Watts of radio frequency power???
In those ARCO oil fields, the natural gas is re-injected into the Earth rather than "flared" off or produced for use, as done in most other oil fields around the world. The re-injected gas increases the oil field pressure and thus creates enhanced oil production. No market for this natural gas exists, as it would be very expensive to pipe it from there to market in the US. The HAARP site is close to an already granted right-of-way for a future Trans-Alaska gas Pipeline! All of the significant regulatory hurdles have been passed for constructing the gas line should markets be found. Does HAARP and its possible military mission represent a huge natural gas market for ARCO?
Originally posted by frozen_snowman
It is an irony when I look at the HAARP Webpage and the descriptions for their project is stated as a research program.
Well yes it is - in a way, but with looking at the patent there is obviously a different agenda in play…
puz:
Originally posted by frozen_snowman
So.. now.. where does the electicity come from to to produce approximately 3.6 million Watts of radio frequency power???
Originally posted by aussiespeeder
reply to post by Essan
So Essan youre the weather dude just supposing whats the worst case scenario for a HAARP heated ionosphere?
You can view the HAARP Log for the whole year of 2005. Many readers have written to ask, "Was HAARP on when the earthquake, hurricane (or whatever) occurred?"
I usually need to write back and tell them that HAARP was not on at that time. For the last 5 years, I have been looking for correlations between HAARP transmissions and weather or health effects. As a scientist and researcher, I have kept a continuous log of HAARP transmission since early 1999. So far, I have not found any correlations. But now you can do your own observations. Was HAARP on last month when you got that fever or rash, or when that strange weather or tornado happened? You can check that for yourself by reviewing the online version of the complete HAARP Log.
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
Was HAARP on when the Chinese earthquake occurred? A Taiwanese satellite registered a decrease in ionospheric electron density by one-half at the time of the earthquake. An Australian scientist said there was undoubtedly ionospheric precursor (whether as a cause or an effect is not stated). As I understand it, HAARP can be aimed.