"Flight 77" The White Plane (new CIT release!)

CIT further exposes the mainstream media cover-up with this extremely important new 37 minute short revealing what the people of Arlington REALLY saw on 9/11.

It's clear the media is complicit in this operation and/or manipulated by the perpetrators so to accept what they report out of hand and keep turning back to the previously published eyewitness accounts as valid evidence can only push us farther from the truth.

Here we lift the veil of media deception to give you an inside look at how the operation was carried out.

Citizen Investigation Team presents:

"Flight 77" The White Plane

reply to post by Craig Ranke CIT


Just watched the video...nice job!

Im confused though as to why you dont think the plane the witness saw in the video could not have been the E4B that was flying over the white house.

reply to post by etshrtslr


For a few reasons....

1. NOBODY we talked to reports 4 engines.

2. We have even more reports (still unreleased) that it was more like a two tone plane like this:


3. The report from CNET radio that there was a "light white jet circling the helipad area" AND one by the white house.
(no other reports have the E4B circling the Pentagon or being over Arlington at all.)

4. The fact that the E4B was paraded out in the open CLEARLY meant to be seen by everyone and has now been touted by the mainstream media as being THE white plane.

It's quite clear this plane was used as a cover story.

The last minutes of this new video are extremely important to show how snippets of the truth slipped through the editing crews from the army's propaganda arm in the news rooms.

This note especially, shown after the footage from ABC and CNN :
""So on 9/11 a white jet was reported as early as 9:40 by ABC and 0:44 by CNN"", (LT: circling above the Pentagon and the White House)

Can you post a Pentagon area map with the newly discovered flight path parts described by these new witnesses?
Especially the description by Jamal and Cindy places the white plane within a small corridor of possible paths.
I would say no more than 50 meters wide.

Then we have the previously drawn flight paths by the 2 Pentagon police officers, to the North of the Citgo gas station, which we now can combine with the above, and my question is, does that corroborate with the ( questionable or not ?) FDR data from the AA ?

Well done, Craig, Aldo and the rest of the crew!
So many armchair theorists, and so few investigative journalists, luckily we have you guys to assist us by checking the stone hard facts.

The flight path is the same as it always has been as these witnesses simply corroborate everything we have been reporting all along.

In the LIFE Magazine commemorative edition titled "The land of the free Sept. 11 and after" on pages 22-23 there is a diagram of the pentagon with the roads mapped out showing the approach of the flight path as it met with the building.

The very strange thing is it matches exactly your map (above)of the flight path along with the FDR data (That is to say not hitting the light poles).

Issue date on magazine is November 12 2001.

reply to post by Stillresearchn911


Do you have a hard copy?

Can you scan the image?

I think the E-4 had taken off from Andrews just to get safely in the air and not be caught on the ground in case it was needed by the president. Thats the standard operating procedure for an emergency.
Maybe NORAD had them take a look over the D.C. area to get a better view of what was going on. Thats what this plane is for, Secure communications of the Military for command.
One day we may get to the truth of what happened that day.