It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
Jprophet... look at :
1. the condition of the buildings
2. the fire in the buildings
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
Originally posted by ThichHeaded
Then they say they fell cause of Fire.... ahhh ya.... OK THEN!!!!
Who is "they?" Can you give me a source for "them." I would hope that "they" realized 40 stories of a falling skyscraper was raining debris on top of it.
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
Jprophet... look at :
1. the condition of the buildings
2. the fire in the buildings
Originally posted by ThichHeaded
Wasn't it Banker's Trust that had a 23 story gash in it from remains of the WTC when it fell.
Originally posted by 2PacSade
Yes you are correct.
2PacSade-
Originally posted by thedman
Loss of even 1 or 2 columns would compromise stability of building.
The roof was damaged by debris falling from WTC 2, and approximately half of the north face of the building experienced projectile impact and fire damage. WTC 2 projectiles severed spandrel beams at floors 8 to 11 in the 2nd bay from the west end, and in a middle bay at the 6th floor. Terra cotta slabs were damaged mostly in the exterior bay at these locations. In general, the projectiles damaged only the masonry and broke many terra cotta features. The damage to the interior structural terra cotta floor slabs was primarily due to the brittle fracture of the terra cotta slabs upon impact by large debris. Most of the damage was restricted to the two northernmost bays, with the exception of fire damage on the 1st through 5th, 7th through 10th, 14th, 21st, and 23rd floors. The fire did not spread to the south side of the building, except for the first 4 floors. Columns were buckled 1-2 inches on the 8th and 23rd floors, approximately a foot below the ceiling, as shown in Figures 7-16 and 7-17. A tube column supporting a north exit stair from the roof and a built-up column supporting the roof were the only other heat-induced buckling damage observed during initial inspections.
This type of construction, with terra cotta tiles providing fire protection, was common in early 20th century construction. The style of construction resulted in a highly compartmentalized building, which may have helped slow the spread of fire. The Fire Department of New York was able to control the fires in this building. The fire damage observed in the building, with minimal structural damage from a normal fire load, is considered typical for this type of construction and fire protection; however, it has been suggested that the scaffolding that was in place for renovations contributed to the spread of fire between floors that may not have occurred otherwise. However, the only structural damage observed was buckling damage near the tops of two columns
Originally posted by thedman
Reason 90 West survived was that it was designed and built in 1907
and built like Brick Sh*thouse unlike modern buildings. The columns were
spaced only 18 ft apart, floors were made of terra cotta archs covered with
concrete, most steel columns were covered in terra cotta brickwork
up 6" thick. Unlike modern buildings which are cheap and nasty -
everything is flimsy (mostly sheetrock), steelwork with thin coat of spray
on protection (which oftens peels off or is scraped off by workers
during construction)
Maybe should take some courses in building construction and fire
protection before you critize others.
Originally posted by Griff
Now, what you said is true. But, that doesn't negate your statement of a building loosing 1 or 2 columns and becomming unstable.
The glazing and facade damage in the building was similar to that found in WFC 1 and WFC 2, which also had extensive cracking and breakage of glazing and granite panels. Debris from WTC 1 caused a collapse of the top 8 stories of the 10-story octagonal extension located at the southeast side of the building. The main WFC 3 building suffered damage from floors 17 to 26. A three-story section of exterior column trees from WTC 1 hung from the base of the collapsed area at floor 20, as shown in Figure 7-2, with approximately 25 feet of the column hanging outside the building. At floors 17 through 26, the corner column had been removed by the impact of debris, and the floors cantilevered from adjacent columns to the north and west. Smaller column debris penetrated floor 17. The damage did not extend past the corner bay, which had to be shored and was later demolished.
Interior damage is shown in Figure 7-5. Inspection of the interior determined that steel framing members that sustained direct impact from large debris had significant portions of the cementitious fireproofing material knocked off. The fireproofing was intact on adjacent steel members that had not been directly hit.
The localized nature of the damage, given the size of projectiles that impacted the building, is notable. Observations noted small welds between column end bearing plates at exterior and interior columns, indicating the columns near the damage zone were designed for gravity loads, and tension loads from wind were not a critical design parameter. This type of connection between columns may have allowed a column member to be knocked out of place without causing substantial displacement or damage to connecting framing.
Originally posted by thedman
the fires were
contained and extinguished unlike WTC 7 which was allowed to burn
unchecked.
Originally posted by Griff
Originally posted by 2PacSade
Yes you are correct.
2PacSade-
But, according to our resident fifefighter here, that should have collapsed at near freefall into it's own footprint also.
Originally posted by thedman
Loss of even 1 or 2 columns would compromise stability of building. . .
and a quote from thdman's next post-
Reason 90 West survived was that it was designed and built in 1907
and built like Brick Sh*thouse unlike modern buildings. The columns were
spaced only 18 ft apart, floors were made of terra cotta archs covered with
concrete, most steel columns were covered in terra cotta brickwork
up 6" thick. Unlike modern buildings which are cheap and nasty -
everything is flimsy (mostly sheetrock), steelwork with thin coat of spray
on protection (which oftens peels off or is scraped off by workers
during construction)
Maybe should take some courses in building construction and fire
protection before you critize others.
The Deutsche Bank Building at 130 Liberty Street in New York City, United States, was built as Bankers Trust Plaza and opened in 1974 and is slated to be deconstructed in 2007. Bankers Trust was acquired by Deutsche Bank in 1998.
The 40-story building was severely damaged by the collapse of the 2 World Trade Center (South Tower) in the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. The collapse of 2 World Trade Center tore a 24-story gash into the facade and destroyed the lobby. As of July 2005, the Deutsche Bank Building was the only real visible sign that a large-scale disaster had occurred at the site, the gaping hole in its front serving as an eerie reminder of the tragedy. The building was declared a total loss in 2004.
. . .The 40-storey building has a facade of black anodized aluminium and darkened glass. The lower portion of the 172 m tall, yet squat building is characterized by wide supporting piers that taper upwards and inwards. . .
Originally posted by thedman
. . .modern buildings which are cheap and nasty -
everything is flimsy (mostly sheetrock), steelwork with thin coat of spray
on protection (which oftens peels off or is scraped off by workers
during construction). . .
WTF you think we are stupid?
Originally posted by thedman
WTF you think we are stupid?
Yea
If you read posts would understand that WFC (World Finance Center 3 -
aka American Express Building) did not suffer same degree of damage
as WTC7 where debris penetrated deep into building. Fires at WTC 7 were
allowed to burn for hours whereas at WFC fires were not on same level
as WTC 7 in which entire floors were fully involved. I know the people
who put out the fires at WFC - were contained and not allowed to spread
WFC 3 unlike WTC7 was not declared "off limits" - FF had access to it
to get to the fires before got out of control!
Originally posted by thedman
Debris strikes did not penetrate deeply into building as did
at WTC 7.
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by thedman
Debris strikes did not penetrate deeply into building as did
at WTC 7.
So keep telling us about this major damage to WTC 7, you are justing wasting your time and energy. Unless you get a paycheck for it that is...
.... this video shows all 4 corners did not fail at the same time.