Proof of explosive devices (the media coverage they don't want you to see)

Simply by watching this 10 minutes video, you can't deny the possibility that 911 was an inside job. ( My opinion)

This is a compilation of all the evidence and witnesses who heard explosives go off. There are reports of explosions before the towers even collapsed.

They didn't show this news coverage on television back when it happened, perhaps these are videos that didn't make the cut...

Bombs, explosions, secondary explosions, explosive devices....how many more times do we need to hear these words being said by 9/11 witnesses before we start asking questions about what really happened on that awful day?

This video shows that many actual 9/11 witnesses heard and saw explosions going off inside the towers, long before they actually fell. These witnesses include police, firemen and mainstream media reporters.

And what is even more shocking is the fact that all of this has been ignored by the mainstream media.

We really need to wake up to the facts and ask questions. If we don't, what does that say about us? (more) (less)

Now, this is the news coverage that makes sense and relates to what happened to the towers that day.

With this sort of news coverage, there would not have been this many questions about 911, logically...

I ask you to look at this video and make up your opinion for your self. If you want to share your opinion with others please try to do it in a polite manner. Thank you.





[edit on 16-5-2007 by selfless]

I truley believe the US Government knew, and had a hand somewhere along the lines in ensuring this attack occured.

But to prepare the towers for demo,
and activley demolish it ...

just leaves way to much 'chance' that the entire plot could become public.

Yes planned demo's.. are pretty much at a perfection.

But in a structure of that size, with people all around during the demo...

Leaves too many chances that someone might see hear or stumble across something..

IE

Imagine if a news reported had of stumbled across some unexploded charge in the rubble... live, picked it up and gone whats this rah rah rah...
Boom, someone was prepared for this atack thoe whole terrorist notion goes out the window.

Originally posted by selfless

They didn't show this news coverage on television back when it happened, perhaps these are videos that didn't make the cut...

Actually selfless the reports of explosions from the live tv reporting that day is the one thing that most stayed with me and most troubled me, and that made me question the official pack of lies.

It was the way in which it quickly fell down the memory hole that confirmed my suspicions, and now it's considered heresy.

You have to get your news while its hot; after a few hours, like cheap bread, it's indigestible.

Originally posted by Agit8dChop
I truley believe the US Government knew, and had a hand somewhere along the lines in ensuring this attack occured.

But to prepare the towers for demo,
and activley demolish it ...

just leaves way to much 'chance' that the entire plot could become public.

Yes planned demo's.. are pretty much at a perfection.

But in a structure of that size, with people all around during the demo...

Leaves too many chances that someone might see hear or stumble across something..

But that's exactly what happened, they just didn't broadcast this side of the story on that day...

In this video you see all the facades of what was reported and witnessed on that day and it points to controlled demolitions.

To be honest, even if we saw missiles hit the building live and the government would have said they were planes, some people would believe them.

I mean look at what happened on 911, many reports of explosions yet the majority of the public chooses to ignore this.

Ignorance is bliss they say, and that's why this took place in front of the eyes of everyone.

Just the way the building explodes and collapses doesn't look like structural failure to me...

Originally posted by gottago
Actually selfless the reports of explosions from the live tv reporting that day is the one thing that most stayed with me and most troubled me, and that made me question the official pack of lies.

I see, well that's exactly why i assumed that this was never on the air.... thanks for clearing that out for me but that just makes things even more corrupted...

How is it possible for something like this to happen and then, they report on the news from witnesses who talks about explosives. But yet Here we are a few years later and it's not even in the official reports... In fact, it's not even considered in the majority of the publics awareness.

How is this even possible? How can people have let this pass like it never happened?

This is like a news report about how someone blows up a gas station with explosives and a few years later it's reported that the gas station was not blown up...

If this isn't proof that what you see on the6:00 news is filtered than I don't know what is. Somebody made damn sure that even the live reports that day matched their official story.Explain to me how a guy in a cave with a laptop did that. I'm with the lady at the end of that video. If there was still a WAY ABOVE TOP SECRET AWARD you would get my vote. Excellent post."FLAGGED".

Originally posted by selfless

How is it possible for something like this to happen and then, they report on the news from witnesses who talks about explosives. But yet Here we are a few years later and it's not even in the official reports... In fact, it's not even considered in the majority of the publics awareness.

How is this even possible? How can people have let this pass like it never happened?

Well the news is messy at the beginning. Reporters, when stuff is actually happening, are on their own, and simply report.

Later, once the official story comes down, they start to filter and edit in the newsroom. That's why the initial reports are so important, they're largely unfiltered.

Just our free press in action, is all.

Flag this thread, raise awareness.

I want many people to see this video, I think this is very important in raising awareness of what took place that day.

I like this type of compilation it really proves a lot, I wish there was one for the pentagon of the initial people that were interviewed about the plane they saw, also there was a video that I saw from Oklahoma City where there were many emergency response and police reports that they had found multiple bombs there.

Someone should make a video to encorporate all anaomlies with 9/11

I have seen and read so much about inside and outside the building's
Floors being closed off weeks before hand with workmen working but nowhere to be seen.

Bomb sniffer dogs taken out days before hand.

Concrete pillows to keep the sea back being moved 2-3 meters each.

Layers of fine dust covering radiators every morning in the week prior to the planes hitting.

WTC7 -

Molten steel XXX ft under the ground.

ect ect ect

It would be nice to see ALL things that don't add up in 1 place.

Happy living US of A

(dont get me wrong here the the UK we have our share as well.
Like the Israeli Diplomats being told to move out of thier hotel hours before a bus blew up outside.)

To me the evidence that there is a cover-up is that the government officially concluded there were NOT bombs in the building without doing a thorough investigation to determine whether or not there were bombs.

How could the government conclude there were no bombs?

oops

(Sorry, not meant to be a one liner, posted in wrong thread)

[edit on 16-5-2007 by Reality Hurts]

Nice video, I especially like the old lady at the end.

I try to show my flatmates these kinda vid’s but they watch 1 minute of it, laugh then walk away from the truth.

I know there entitled to their opinions but when you have video footage such as this with many people testifying that explosions were taking place, on top of that 3 buildings which, as luck would have it, all collapse in the same (demolition) style. How can you not think something dogy is going on.

ITS COMMON SENSE…………

Originally posted by nick7261
To me the evidence that there is a cover-up is that the government officially concluded there were NOT bombs in the building without doing a thorough investigation to determine whether or not there were bombs.

How could the government conclude there were no bombs?

Good point,

Probably because they would have no way to explain that terrorists infiltrated the world trade center and placed some very high tech and professionally dispatched demolition charges.

Originally posted by eddiemaiden_80
Nice video, I especially like the old lady at the end.

I try to show my flatmates these kinda vid’s but they watch 1 minute of it, laugh then walk away from the truth.

I know there entitled to their opinions but when you have video footage such as this with many people testifying that explosions were taking place, on top of that 3 buildings which, as luck would have it, all collapse in the same (demolition) style. How can you not think something dogy is going on.

ITS COMMON SENSE…………

Yes, very much true...

I am flabbergasted at how it's even possible for people to continue their every day lives and not even question the event that took place...

The evidence collection is overwhelming with new evidence growing every day...

Just like you said, 3 buildings collapsing from structural failure and pan caking into their own footprints for the first time in history and all on the same day.

I just can't phantom the idea that anyone would not understand what took place, it's like a twilight zone where everyone around you is clueless to the obvious while you are screaming trying to wake them up...

Originally posted by selfless

Originally posted by nick7261
To me the evidence that there is a cover-up is that the government officially concluded there were NOT bombs in the building without doing a thorough investigation to determine whether or not there were bombs.

How could the government conclude there were no bombs?

Good point,

Probably because they would have no way to explain that terrorists infiltrated the world trade center and placed some very high tech and professionally dispatched demolition charges.

This might be more important than anybody realizes. Let's assume 9/11 was scripted so that the entire story could be summarized as:

"Terrorists hijack airplanes to attack U.S."

This script led to the consequence of increased airport security, The Patriot Act, the war in Iraq, etc.

But it did NOT lead to the consequence of increased security around buildings or train stations to protect them from being blown up. Then what happens next? Terrorists blow up the train station in Spain and the London subway and the authorities act surprised again like, "Wow! Who would have ever thought that terrorists would think to blow up a train station or a subway stop!?"

I.e., if they would have said there were bombs in WTC1 and WTC2 then they would have been forced to take measures to prevent terrorists from blowing up things like the train station and subway. This would have left the government in a bind -they couldn't use terrorists blowing up buildings as a political tool without making themselves look like fools for letting it happen AGAIN.

Therefore, whether bombs were used on 9/11 or not, the government had to SAY there were no bombs.

Just a theory...

I think it's close to impossible to set up demolition charges into one of the biggest buildings of the US, if you are not doing it with inside sources of the government. (shadow government)

This is why they don't want people to know there was explosives... Common sense and logic couldn't allow blame to be on someone else but them selves. I mean the majority can be dumb some times but there is a limit...

Flying steel beams should be proof enough of explosive elements in the towers. Measure the time and distance values if you have any doubt.

It is not that difficult to design a plan which could remain confined to those at the top. Those who were responsible for the towers held, and now hold even more power. Prior to 9/11, the towers represented a money pit. There were design flaws and regulatory issues which were going to require potentially billions to correct.

The Port Authority of NY/NJ had sought to acquire demolition permits for the towers and were turned down, due to safety concerns for the surrounding area.

I believe these are people who do not accept rejection.

If I was going to develop a plan to take these buildings down, I would use an elaborate system of wireless devices which would sequentially trigger each other once initialized. I would also utilize similar devices to pre-weaken the structures by cutting away at the vertical supports.

To cut the columns, I would create a device composed of three rectangular extrusions connected in a u-shape that could be easily attached to the support columns and concealed in the region between the ceiling tiles and the floor above.

The central core would be a little more challenging. The devices would require a larger capacity, and it might also be necessary to fill sections of certain columns with thermate.

The floor pans would also need to be addressed because there is another issue with dropping that amount of mass straight down. It could possibly crack the slurry walls, causing a huge flood of Lower Manhattan.

It's likely that the charges used on the central cores contained high-powered explosives designed to pulverize the floor pans as well as knock out the huge core columns.

As far as having any of these charges remaining to be found, I would provide for secondary detonation signals to be sent as the building fell to trigger any devices which did not receive the initial signal. Objects remaining after the collapse woould be buried and could not detonate without receiving their specific digitally encoded signal. Nobody could accidentally pick one of these up, and they would be still attached to the columns, looking like some kind of structural bracket.

The cleanup crew would be composed of or supervised by the very same professionals who oversaw the placing of the demolition material. Thye would have instructions as to which sections of steel were made available for inspection, and which pieces were immediately loaded onto barges for export.

There is a lot of evidence for thermite and its derivatives being placed in the towers.

When the north tower came down, a 70-storey portion of its central core remained standing for about fifteen seconds. Many cross-members and beams were gone and some of the vertical columns could be seen falling off as the dust and smoke cloud rose. Suddenly, the remaining section began to lean slightly, and then came straight down, appearing to turn to dust as it vertically descended out of view.

I feel that this aspect provides a good case for thermate being packed into the core columns, and detonated by a back-up system. CNN had initially broadcasted the longest footage of the north tower collapse. Recent replays of the collapse are heavily editted, switching between different perspectives and cutting off before the spire can be seen standing.

All the white smoke produced just prior each collapse is also a tell-tale sign.

The fix is in, and we are dependent on those with the foresight to record the news footage that day.

Also consider that building seven's collapse was barely given any coverage that day, and has been absent from the mainstream media. It is yet another occupant of the memory hole.

Are you aware there were contracts in place to remove the weak and replace the fire proofing materials right on the beams? You do know that job would require the area to be curtained off with plastic sheeting and duck tape. So who knows what went on behind those dusty plastic sheets?

All of the facts ads up to one thing, the enemy is guarding the gates.

This video already had a thread.