It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Because that was the best way to come down from where it was.
Originally posted by blue bird
AND WHY DIAGONAL?
Some of the most interesting areas are too near the poles to be a good option for a robot, at least for now.
Originally posted by mikesingh
Now the question is....WHY THE DEVIL DON'T NASA OR ESA PLAN TO LAND THEIR ROVERS/BUGGIES NEAR MANY OF THESE VERY INTRIGUING AREAS?
Originally posted by ArMaP
Because that was the best way to come down from where it was.
And yes, I think that was made by a rock
First of all, I think the track starts at the bottom right and goes to top left and not the other way.
Originally posted by zorgon
Thats just silly... it would have to defy gravity to make that transverse in a straight line across a steep slope... and arc maybe but not a straight line
The shape of the track depends on the shape of the rock. I know this is silly, but imagine a rock with the general shape of the Mercedes symbol but without the rim around it. Imagine now that one of the three points of that rock is brocken and so it is wider than the others. The resulting track would be something like this:
What kind of rock... and how did it make small holes on "bounces" two in a row then long ones then back to short ones...
I did not said it because I think that that track is more likely to have been made by a rock, I only say what I think, regardless of what other people think.
Now if you had said "Linear Collapse" I might have given you more credit
Originally posted by ArMaP
The fact that are many other tracks around it and at least one has a rock at the end helps me think this was made by a rock, like all those other tracks in the other two photos that were posted some time ago.
Originally posted by ArMaP
And to know if it is up-hill or down-hill we have to know something we do not know just by looking at the photo, i.e. the relative altitude of all those areas.
Really? You mean you cannot tell which part is the high ground when looking at a picture like that? The peaks and valley are really quite obvious "just by looking"and the shadows highlight the high points...
Originally posted by ArMaPI know this is silly, but imagine a rock with the general shape of the Mercedes symbol but without the rim around it.
It's more like 6 out of 8, if I did not get the tracks mixed.
Originally posted by mikesingh
OK. So one out of ten tracks has a rock at the end. How about the other nine?
I do not have to manufacture anything to explain the tracks, that was just a way to try to explain what I think.
Originally posted by zorgon
So now you have to manufacture silly shaped boulders to explain the tracks... and the flaw in your opinion is as you say the rock is missing...
Apparently my idea was not the best. When I spoke of the "Mercedes rock" I was thinking of the shape of a cross-section of the rock because I thought it would be easier to imagine, some people have some difficulty imagining 3D objects with unfamiliar shapes.
AND if you look closely at the pattern of the marks your Mercedes Rock must have changed as it rolled because the pattern changes..
No, it goes in an almost perfect straight line, if you put the image in an image editing program and draw a line you will see that the track makes a very slight bend to the right, imagining that the track starts at the bottom of the image.
It also goes in a perfectly straight line, despite the changes in elevation and does not follow the "lay of the land"
Originally posted by ArMaP
The rock I suppose made that track could have a cross-section looking like the Mercedes symbol and a different cross-section looking like a perfect circle (not the band ), and a third cross-section looking like a five points star.
No, it goes in an almost perfect straight line, if you put the image in an image editing program and draw a line you will see that the track makes a very slight bend to the right, imagining that the track starts at the bottom of the image.
As for the changes in elevation, I do not see anything that shows any difference in elevation along the track, the only changes I see along the track are changes in the colour of the ground.
Originally posted by zorgon
OY and you skeptics call US crazy... :shk:
[edit on 21-5-2007 by zorgon]
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Do i believe everything you (or John, or RikRiley, or undo, or sleeper....) say? No, but i do believe that is is plausible, possible, and sometimes probable.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
The thing about "skeptics" is that they represent the best side of myself. I am skeptical...but i also believe that until we can prove it beyond any possible arguement, anything is possible. What is so hard about admitting this?
Do i believe everything you (or John, or RikRiley, or undo, or sleeper....) say? No, but i do believe that is is plausible, possible, and sometimes probable.
What is the problem with a rock with many different cross sections?
Originally posted by zorgon
That Mercedes Rock is some rock alright with all those different cross sections and protuberances... mighty impressive boulder indeed...
You look like someone with a good imagination.
Why would I imagine it starts at the bottom of the image, when the overall image clearly shows which way is UP?
If I understand what you are saying you are talking about two different things, a flat surface and level ground.
Ah I see... so what you are telling me then... if there are no changes in elevation as you say, then this Mercedes Rock rolled a long distance on a flat surface... bouncing, twisting and skipping across this level ground, so it lands on the different points on the three cross sections of this Mercedes Rock...
If by “level” you mean horizontal, I never spoke of level ground.
Okay I have seen rocks in Utah move over a flat surface, (leaving a flat continuous trail)... so ignoring the fact that the image is of a CHASM, with clearly defined and described steep SLOPES... we will assume for a moment that the track is on level ground...
I said it from the beginning that I could not find anything that could have made that track on the photo, if you read my posts you know that I said it at least once.
Okay so where is this miraculous Mercedes Rock that made this strange track? Surely it did not just vanish into thin air?
I never called you crazy, but I can start at any time you like. If you like it I can even call other things, and in even in different languages.
OY and you skeptics call US crazy... :shk:
Originally posted by ArMaP
Any ideas?
I never called you crazy,