It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ANOK
reply to post by Swampfox46_1999
LOL you think we haven't seen the same pics you have? Or are privy to the same information?
Sry but my opinion doesn't come from not seeing the same stuff you have. I guess somehow you see a 757 in that small amount of rubble? Sry but I don't, and you can huff and puff and jump up and down all you want it's not going to change my opinion.
Can you explain how the engine shrouds managed to not hit the ground before the whole plane was supposedly swallowed by the pentagoon. And can you do it without the attitude... Thanx mate...
Originally posted by ANOK
reply to post by Swampfox46_1999
Can you explain how the engine shrouds managed to not hit the ground before the whole plane was supposedly swallowed by the pentagoon. And can you do it without the attitude... Thanx mate...
Originally posted by Dr Love
reply to post by Swampfox46_1999
I can actually feel myself getting dumber everytime I look at those pictures, but not dumb enough to believe that a 757 hit the Pentagon.
Peace
Originally posted by eyewitness86 The BIG fact is this: There were TWO massive sin tons ( each ) engines that supposedly slammed into the wall: WHERE are the hols and damage from those engines? There is none! It does not exist! you believe that the NOSE of an aircraft could cause one huge hole and that the engines would cause NO damage? See how silly it is to believe a large jet hit there?
There are NO SUITCASES and NO clothing
and NO airplane debris...just shards and pieces of the thing that blew up.
The perfectly round hole deeper inside the Pentagon could NOT, in any way, shape or form have caused the holes we see; but a missle could.
There is NO evidence whatsoever that an aircraft hit the Pentagon.
ONLY the careless and uninformed could believe the fairy tale that is the official story.
Originally posted by darkbluesky
Whatever dude.
Show me the picture of the hole caused by the nose, through which the 96" diameter engine nacelles could not fit.
Originally posted by OrionStars
Originally posted by darkbluesky
Whatever dude.
Show me the picture of the hole caused by the nose, through which the 96" diameter engine nacelles could not fit.
With all due respect, isn't that what people have repeatedly requested you to do in order to substantiate your hypothesis?
Originally posted by darkbluesky
I mean really, they just keep parroting the same ridiculous questions over and over again, and I and others keep providing the pictures and explanations, which they in turn dismiss as "fake" or ignore completely and then ask the same questions all over again.
Originally posted by darkbluesky
One last time.
This picture shows the damage to the front of the building.
Originally posted by jdposey
I remember before the entire 9/11 incidents took place, I used to watch a Barbara Olson on the news channel, perhaps MSNBC or FOX. When 9/11 came about, specifically the Pentagon incident, I remember the news people being frantic that Barbara Olson was on the plane that was driven into the Pentagon. Her husband later stated that she made two phone calls from that plane before its impact upon the Pentagon.
I know I have read that Barbara Olson was later arrested in Europe, but this could never be proven. Here is an article I came across regarding that arrest:
www.redflagdeals.com...
Barbara Olson never made any calls from any plane. The FBI testified in the trial of Zacharias Moussaoui that there were two ' attempted calls ' from the plane, but the only one that was connected registered ZERO seconds. So the FBI says there were no calls from Barb to Ted. Ted lied or was fooled by voice morph, or is a player. No other way. The calls never happened.
Barbara I am afraid is with all the others, the guys from Rayethon and all the other special people that died that day: At the bottom of the sea somewhere. The perps could not allow one person to be found alive and blow the whole thing wide open....no way. What are anopther hundred or so lives when you are that deep into mass murder?
www.rense.com...
I think the smoking gun on this entire subject would be Barbara Olson. If she shows up, you have your evidence that there was no plane. unfortunately, she has never shown up since the crash and, I think that pretty well substantiates that she was indeed on the plane that hit the Pentagon and is dead.
Originally posted by darkbluesky
Here is a close up of the area near the tip of the right wing, it shows damage consistent with impact by the leading edge of the wing.
I know my lines are speculation and conjecture, They don't prove a 757 caused the damage but they illustrate that it is possible that a 757 caused the damage. I'm posting these for everyone that keeps saying it was impossible for a 757 to cause the damage seen.