It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ForceMaster
How about the Pentagon? The footage of the Pentagon after the plane "crashed" into it shows that there was a fire inside, but no outside damage! The so called parts they found of the "plane" was of a different plane and one much smaller. The parts were old. The thought that someone would think that a plane so big would fit through a window and then disintigrate takes a huge amount of self convincing! No engine, no wings, nothing. I looked at the footage and I cannot believe they pulled it off. A huge plane simply not there, no bodies, and no outer damage to the building...WOW
Originally posted by andy1033
3) what about the fact that they shot down flight 93, why not just tell the public?
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
The the points should be simple to state and explain, so that anyone can understand.
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
250,000 ATS Points
I'll give 250,000 ATS Points to the member that creates the most eloquent, and concise list of 5 solid items, with irrefutable supporting evidentiary links.
Then I'll move your post to a new thread, give you credit and link at the top of the site.
I am the sole judge.
Points awarded to runners up also.
Ready... go...
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
... the most eloquent, and concise list of 5 solid items, with irrefutable supporting evidentiary links.
Originally posted by lizziex3
there are no conspiracys. All these things people are talking about can easily be disputed if you really do some research. Even the theory that a giant plane couldnt have gone through the pentagon like that can be debunked.