It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by hotpinkurinalmint
This thread brings up an interesting issue of how much personal responsibility soldiers should take for the blunders of the US government. I am not saying that people should spit on soldiers or that every US soldier has murdered or otherwise directly harmed innocent Iraqis, but we should question whether they are truly blameless. On one hand, many soldiers do not approve of the USA's blunders in Iraq, so they should not be personally blamed for incidents like Abu graib or the killings in Haditha. Many are serving in Iraq against their will and would not serve if they had the option. On the other hand, "just following orders" is not a valid excuse.
Your thoughts?
Originally posted by hotpinkurinalmint
This thread brings up an interesting issue of how much personal responsibility soldiers should take for the blunders of the US government. I am not saying that people should spit on soldiers or that every US soldier has murdered or otherwise directly harmed innocent Iraqis, but we should question whether they are truly blameless. On one hand, many soldiers do not approve of the USA's blunders in Iraq, so they should not be personally blamed for incidents like Abu graib or the killings in Haditha. Many are serving in Iraq against their will and would not serve if they had the option. On the other hand, "just following orders" is not a valid excuse.
Your thoughts?
Originally posted by jsobecky
This is sad. The same things happened to our soldiers when they returned from Viet Nam.
Originally posted by 11Bravo
Originally posted by jsobecky
This is sad. The same things happened to our soldiers when they returned from Viet Nam.
Care to back that up with some facts?
From my little bit of research no returning vietnam soldiers were spit upon.
If you could give me a name or a place or anything else to go on I MIGHT believe you.
Its a classic example of an urban legend used to vilify the anti-war movement.
Im not saying your Syracuse story didnt happen, that remains to be seen, but the Vietnam soldiers story is just that, a story.
[edit on 9-12-2006 by 11Bravo]
Originally posted by 11Bravo
Originally posted by jsobecky
This is sad. The same things happened to our soldiers when they returned from Viet Nam.
Care to back that up with some facts?
From my little bit of research no returning vietnam soldiers were spit upon.
If you could give me a name or a place or anything else to go on I MIGHT believe you.
Its a classic example of an urbal legend used to vilify the anti-war movement.
Im not saying your Syracuse story didnt happen, that remains to be seen, but the Vietnam soldiers story is just that, a story.
Originally posted by rdang
Here go the Kerry type liberals defending this pos's actions.
Well it did happen,and more than once.But as usual liberal types will deny the truth.Were you even born during Vietnam?Just because you can't find a newspaper story does not make it an "urban legend" I do remember,soldiers being hit with eggs,spit on,changing out of their uniform on the plane to avoid the crowds of righteous protesters waiting for them at the airports. Your smug comment "that remains to be seen" like it is another "urban legend" shows you will never believe,what more proof do you want? or does it have to happen right in front of you??
Originally posted by marg6043
You people still do not grasp the point,
One thing is to see the whole incident by a wrong doing
Another one by wanting the demise and death by either lynching, stoning this woman, giving away her address so a mob can invaded her home and punish her any way they want because is OK.
Still you don't get it.
I see how easily this nation population will turn into each other just to satisfy a fetish.
Pity.
Two wars fought for the wrong reasons do not make a right of calling for the harm, death and invasion of somebody's home.
I lost an uncle in Vietnam and I was a child during the 60s and I remember the result of that war.
Still I am no calling for the harm of somebody that did a wrong and should be charge by law but not with going into her home and an invade her privacy.
That is shameful and a wake up call of how low America is falling under the Bush administration war.
Is despicable when the population of our nation gets into that type of thinking.
And to say that American is a Christian nation when people supports this line of thought.
Originally posted by JackJuice
As for public scorn, i believe it is far more humane than a physical attack. But again we agree that her address should never have been giving out.
Originally posted by marg6043
The soldier will be fine, probably he will get a test for hepatitis or other diseases because it was after all bodily fluids.
But her now . . . probably after having her address for public knowledge will need protection, if she feels that her live could be in danger.
That will cost the city money.
Probably she will end up suing somebody for something, the case will end on just harassment and a fine, harassment means she can no be near or around the person she spit on, unless somebody wants to make a statement (probably politically) and add another charge to it, because it was a soldier.
But still this brings some issues of how we react as a society on what we may agree or disagree with.
Thanks for understanding my point.
Originally posted by marg6043
JackJuice,
No, I am not lecturing you, but just one particular post. We are a civilize nation with laws.
A wrong is a wrong no matter what, but the law takes care of it.
My point is that giving away this woman address is a very good indicator that no only violates her safety but it was done with an intention.
The intention that some group will take matters into their hands and cause harm.
Also to punish her with th scorn of society. This makes it no better than having a lynching mob at her home to brand her for everybody to see.
I find this very dangerous to our society, when is people that wants to instigate divisions and fight between Americans citizens.
And we are supposed to be better than the people we are bringing the fight on terror to their lands?
That is my point.
Still a wrong is a wrong and should be deal with no by a lynching mob but the law.
The christian issue is very simple, we are fighting the middle east and they are mostly muslin how can we be instigating violence against our own citizens while claiming that we are people of compasion while preaching that the people we are fighting have none.
Plain and simple.
Wrong,the address was not given out for the reasons you want it to be.I think it comes off the police log,anyone arrested has their info on the log and it's public record.what you are saying is that her crime is "political" and she should be treated differently.
[edit on 9-12-2006 by marg6043]
Originally posted by Rdang
Wrong,the address was not given out for the reasons you want it to be.I think it comes off the police log,anyone arrested has their info on the log and it's public record.what you are saying is that her crime is "political" and she should be treated differently.