It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ultraterrestrial
Originally posted by 27jd
Originally posted by ultraterrestrial
You shouldn't laugh, maybe the ET's have a cloaking device that makes their craft look just like a cloud...
It's pretty obvious to me this guy "unarmed" is just pulling our legs with this ludicrously fake photograph , we shouldn't allow this joker to discredit the rest of the thread although he seems to be apparently trying.
Originally posted by ultraterrestrial
It's pretty obvious to me this guy "unarmed" is just pulling our legs with this ludicrously fake photograph , we shouldn't allow this joker to discredit the rest of the thread although he seems to be apparently trying.
Originally posted by unarmed
With all respect I've posted this pic to CONTRIBUTE to this thread.
I don't know if it's a fake or not, ok? To me it looks pretty real.
Originally posted by unarmed
Sorry guys, if it already had been posted, but this seems to be another pic of O'Hare:
Originally posted by unarmed
With all respect I've posted this pic to CONTRIBUTE to this thread.
Originally posted by unarmed
I don't know if it's a fake or not, ok? To me it looks pretty real.
Originally posted by ultraterrestrial
1. scififan DOES have same joindate as 000000 which is 1/23/07
2. strangely enough, scififan claims to have 'luckily saved' the original alleged o'hare photo before the mods edited it and watermarked it (which I'm assuming was the same date if not almost instantaneously).
Maybe he "just happened" to have saved that original photo because he is the one that uploaded it, i.e. he is "00000000".
Originally posted by jritzmann
Ok I'm early in this as of yet, I just been busy with so much else...
In looking on Google Image Search for shots of O'Hare I found this shot, which shows an issue of airplane congestion on incoming flights:
You can see the image here, at this link from Google
I was looking for shots that might have been manipulated, or I thought I might come across the same vantage point by some stretch of luck.
But, I noticed it was a little strange that certain angles matched the degrees of the Ohare UFO shot, like the bend in the runway. So I overlayed them. This animation might take a couple secs to load but here's a dissolve on the two:
What I notice is there's either a slight bit of lens distortion IF they arent the same picture. OR, I just cant get them aligned right, which might be due in part to being manipulated for making it into the UFO shot. I've aligned them as best I can right now. Again, there's certain angles like the runway that line up so close it's hard to ascribe to luck in positioning. It's really, really close.
What I note is the wicked similarity of stationary objects, and the lights on the horizon area. We dont see them in the UFO shot. But, when you look back and forth between the congestion and the UFO shot, the UFO shot seems to have dark areas around where the lights *should* be. Could they be painted over? Cloned over with treeline? Seems possible to me.
This begs the question to me: If the UFO shot is overcast, and somewhat dark, and the congestion shot seems to be the same, why arent those lights on? You'd think they'd be auto-eye controlled. Maybe the exposure of the cell phone doesnt depict the light conditions, but it was 4:30, reportedly just before dark. I think those lights oughtta be on...thats just me.
Manipulated? I dunno yet. I can say the grain or noise of the UFO photo appears to be very uniform, but I cant say thats exactly out of the nature of a cell phone cam.
I try to picture someone wanting to fake this shot, and coming across this picture (congestion) and thinking that this almost looks like a UFO shot already.
Now, if it IS NOT the same picture manipulated into a UFO shot, then we're looking at a photo thats taken exceedingly close to the same position of the UFO one. We're currently looking into finding a map of the airport so we can determine if this object was indeed over the gate area as desribed. (unless someone has already done that)
Just an interesting shot I wanted to show, might be a clue. I'll keep diggin.
Originally posted by AgainstSecrecy
The pic you found is a fake...here is the code:
ÿØÿà JFIF d d ÿì Ducky < ÿî Adobe dÀ ÿÛ „
ÿÀ È ÿÄ ™ !1AQaq‘"¡±ðÁÑ2áB’#ñRb‚3²ÂÒâSc$T !1AQaq"‘Áá2RÿÚ ? ÷]~ AÔR±Ôߊ§È¦ƒþÄJŽ‚¢Êÿ
adobe...cooooooooool *irony*...anyway nice try.
Originally posted by 27jd
Originally posted by unarmed
With all respect I've posted this pic to CONTRIBUTE to this thread.
I don't know if it's a fake or not, ok? To me it looks pretty real.
Where'd it come from?
Originally posted by jritzmann
Whats fake? The airport? LOL...because there's an adobe tag doesnt mean it's "fake" as you say. Thats in there when it's sized, saved as a different format, or compressed for web use...among alot of other reasons.
[edit on 24-1-2007 by jritzmann]