It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by lardo5150
**DISCLAIMER** I am not a pedophile
Ok, with that said. Wasn't the act of having sex with young males a part of culture back in the days of Rome?
Originally posted by solidshot
as far as i'm concerned there is an age below which you are too young to really decide for yourself what is right and wrong, i believe we have a reasonable age of consent within the UK and i don't think this should be changed
Originally posted by lombozo
Taking away the innocence of a child in my opinion should be a capital offence.
Originally posted by gfad
I dont see the link with snuff films though, murder is a clear and well defined crime, just like robbery or trespassing. I think you linking paedophilia to murder and murderers is a bit inflamatory.
Originally posted by lombozo
I truly believe that murderers should be executed. I also believe that a pedophile who actually commits an act against a child should be executed as well. Pedophiles who have child porn, and the like, but have never committed an actual act, should be chemically castrated.
Just my 2 cents
Originally posted by jtma508
Hold on a second gfad. How can you discount thrill killers as inflamatory? And I'm not talking about snuff films in particular. Whether the act was filmed or not there are countless cases of people that kill because they get a sexual thrill from it. In many cases that's the ONLY way they can get a sexual thrill. If they are sexually drawn to killing how is that any different than being sexually drawn to children or sexually drawn to animals of sexually drawn to corpses or sexually drawn to rudabagers? You are arbitrarily drawing boundaries around your own argument. Each of the cited attractions is characterized by a person's sexual fascination with a particular subject or act. How are they any different than being attracted to a child? I believe the minimum dividing line involves at least informed consent. And even that is a bare minimum.
Originally posted by lombozo While I do not link pedophiles and murderers, I hold them in the same disregard. I truly believe that murderers should be executed. I also believe that a pedophile who actually commits an act against a child should be executed as well. Pedophiles who have child porn, and the like, but have never committed an actual act, should be chemically castrated.
Just my 2 cents
Originally posted by Crakeur
I think you might have raised the ire of murderers world wide. In prison, the most despised crime is pedophilia. That's why pedophiles are usually held in special protective custody, lest they have their throat cut but some angry prisoner.
I think they're both horrific acts but I tend to think that murder is sometimes an act of desperation or environment (not saying it is ok) whereas pedophilia is the murder of innocence. Taking a child's youth away, scarring them for life. That is why many convicts attack pedophiles in prison. Payback for something done to them that the convict feels put them in their criminal shoes.
Originally posted by gfad
Sexual killings intrinsically involve a clear crime - murder. Whereas paedophilia could concievably be considered not a crime.
Originally posted by gfad
Im not discounting thrill killers as inflamatory, im discounting linking paedophiles and thrill killers into the same bag as inflamatory.
Sexual killings intrinsically involve a clear crime - murder. Whereas paedophilia could concievably be considered not a crime.