John Lear's Moon Pictures on ATS

Originally posted by anathema777
South Pole Picture: Source

"The Wall"

"The Wall" Zoomed back a little
www3.filehost.to..." target='_blank' class='tabOff'/>

Maybe the huge 8000x8000 pix "uncontrolled clementine image mosaic" of the south pole can help you find something about this wall.

[edit on 27-2-2007 by looofo]

Okay heres another good one of a crater to the left with what looks like a huge city within it. Again on Nasa's World Wind and untouched images.
How this could be passed as a natural occurance I havent a clue. Looks well designed and thought out too me. Civilization maybe?

Originally posted by looofo
Maybe the huge 8000x8000 pix "uncontrolled clementine image mosaic" of the south pole can help you find something about this wall.

Ah you have redeemed yourself...

well that "Wall" looks like missing data... always a good way to hide stuff..
But wow those crosses sure show up and there are more of them...








That's cool! Now we have confirmation of the crosses from ArMap's image and now this one....

This "Cave" is interesting... very symmetrical opening...



And I wonder what made THESE tracks? Another "wandering Boulder" perhaps?




[edit on 27-2-2007 by zorgon]

Originally posted by looofo

Originally posted by anathema777
South Pole Picture: Source

"The Wall"

"The Wall" Zoomed back a little
www3.filehost.to..." target='_blank' class='tabOff'/>

Maybe the huge 8000x8000 pix "uncontrolled clementine image mosaic" of the south pole can help you find something about this wall.


[edit on 27-2-2007 by looofo]

I love the crator with the half rock circle in it... looks like a little man with a rocket pack on. I know its just my imagination but kinda cool none the less.

www3.filehost.to..." target='_blank' class='tabOff'/>

I have been looking through some of the older Moon photos in some Zon 8 collection I believe.

I have been messing with the contrast looking for Objects in space above the moons horizon. Here is a UFO I just found a few minutes ago...

Here is the original:


Heres the UFO after Contrast Adjustment:


Here again with some visual aid:

Originally posted by anathema777
I have been looking through some of the older Moon photos in some Zon 8 collection I believe.

I have been messing with the contrast looking for Objects in space above the moons horizon. Here is a UFO I just found a few minutes ago...

Nice find. Yes there are a few UFO's. But there is also a lot of other stuff. A lot of it. Are there any more like this? Please let me know where to find them. I am going to send this to Zorgon to confirm my findings and then will post the enlargments.Thanks.

Originally posted by johnlear

Originally posted by anathema777
I have been looking through some of the older Moon photos in some Zon 8 collection I believe.

I have been messing with the contrast looking for Objects in space above the moons horizon. Here is a UFO I just found a few minutes ago...

Nice find. Yes there are a few UFO's. But there is also a lot of other stuff. A lot of it. Are there any more like this? Please let me know where to find them. I am going to send this to Zorgon to confirm my findings and then will post the enlargments.Thanks.

Indeed you are welcome and thank you for the support my new friend

I just found another one using the samre proceedure and think I may have hit the mother load with this one. It almost appears to be as large as a Mothership!

This one really surprised me when it popped out at me a few minutes ago. I really wasn't expecting to see such a large object appear out of the darkness. I do not believe it to be a trick of the light just because of the defined lines, and the shape it takes on, not to mention the curves and the way th ship seems to almost be identical on both sides. I dont know what word Im looking for but kinda how radar can be spelled backwards and forwards, this # looks like it comes together at the middle and then the other side of it seems to be close to a mirror image of the opposite side. This is just my first opinion of what Im seeing but perhaps some of you can add your 2 cent also
Original:
www.cmf.nrl.navy.mil...

Unedited Sized Down:
www2.filehost.to..." target='_blank' class='tabOff'/>

Contrasted:
www2.filehost.to..." target='_blank' class='tabOff'/>

Color Field Edit:


Visual Aid:
www2.filehost.to..." target='_blank' class='tabOff'/>

-------------------------------------------------------------------


Also what is your opinion on these two releases of the same image by NASA? One has been blacked out in the background (first release), and the second is apparently untouched. This lead me to believe that they were originally hiding something in the background so I enhanced the lighting and viola...



You can look up both the pictures on the NASA main site using the file numbers located in the top right corner of each picture and go through the same process I did for the same end result. Curious as to your opinion on this finding of mine...

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Originally posted by johnlear
Nice find. Yes there are a few UFO's. But there is also a lot of other stuff. A lot of it. Are there any more like this? Please let me know where to find them.

Yes here is the link to my source material in regaurds to the UFOs over the horizon of the moon shots...

www.cmf.nrl.navy.mil...


~Anathema

[edit on 28-2-2007 by anathema777]


[edit on 28-2-2007 by anathema777]

Originally posted by anathema777
Also what is your opinion on these two releases of the same image by NASA? One has been blacked out in the background (first release), and the second is apparently untouched. This lead me to believe that they were originally hiding something in the background so I enhanced the lighting and viola...

You might ask Zorgon, personally I don't even bother looking at any Clementine or anything released after 1971 by NASA. Thanks again for the great Zond photo!

Originally posted by johnlear

Originally posted by anathema777
Also what is your opinion on these two releases of the same image by NASA? One has been blacked out in the background (first release), and the second is apparently untouched. This lead me to believe that they were originally hiding something in the background so I enhanced the lighting and viola...

You might ask Zorgon, personally I don't even bother looking at any Clementine or anything released after 1971 by NASA. Thanks again for the great Zond photo!

No problem, I put the source of those "others" that you asked for, that's were the link above leads too. As far as the lander photo goes in the unedited one theres a huge anomaly that shows up in the background with what also appears to be a UFO to the top right of it. Perhaps that is what they were trying to hide in the original photo, but messed up by releasing the second unedited photo. I am looking forward to what Zorg thinks about the huge UFO in the post right above this one. This is the most fun I have had in quite some time.

Originally posted by zorgon



And I wonder what made THESE tracks? Another "wandering Boulder" perhaps?

Well, to me it looks not like a "wandering rock' at all, look closely at it and you can clearly see that it looks like a tube running right straight through the dirt.
Simple tube!
Might be just tube.

[edit on 28-2-2007 by Toadmund]

Might also be where they stuck two pictures together. Just a thought.

TheBorg

Originally posted by johnlear

Originally posted by anathema777
I have been looking through some of the older Moon photos in some Zon 8 collection I believe.

I have been messing with the contrast looking for Objects in space above the moons horizon. Here is a UFO I just found a few minutes ago...

Nice find. Yes there are a few UFO's. But there is also a lot of other stuff. A lot of it. Are there any more like this? Please let me know where to find them. I am going to send this to Zorgon to confirm my findings and then will post the enlargments.Thanks.

I like this little guy in the referenced pic even better...



Looks kind of like this one



or this one...



or this one...



or this one...



Or maybe there are no similarities at all.

Originally posted by johnlear

You might ask Zorgon, personally I don't even bother looking at any Clementine or anything released after 1971 by NASA. Thanks again for the great Zond photo!

Nope Clementine has proven useless... the old ones are jpgs with way to much pixel anomalies and data loss and the new color ones are fun to find coverups, but not much help in finding useful anomalies.

However there seem to be some really good ones in the other images. I have been downloading them into a separate file. There are too many of them too quickly to do them justice though, so they will have to wait till I can go through them in detail. I have been working on the King crater set and the "city" ones to get better detail.

But keep finding them... I will get to them sooner or later... and keep right on highlighting them...

Originally posted by anathema777
You can look up both the pictures on the NASA main site using the file numbers located in the top right corner of each picture and go through the same process I did for the same end result. Curious as to your opinion on this finding of mine...

It would be nice if you included the link to the originals along with your clips to save us time... There are so many NASA sites to find images on its very time consuming to try to find the exact copies. This would be greatly appreciated and make it easier to judge your submission.

As to the process, I prefer to use my own process to view images...

A note on Clementine... Clementine was a DoD/Navy project NASA only provided mission control.

I have the day off tomorrow so I will go through all of your previous ones and have a look at the ones John is excited about first

No problem. I have been trying to provide the original but havent been linking them to th main site cause I go through, download and then post later after searching through. From here on in I will do a better job of also linking to the source file on their main site. What pictures are you reffering to that Johns excited about exactly bud?

Originally posted by Toadmund

Well, to me it looks not like a "wandering rock' at all, look closely at it and you can clearly see that it looks like a tube running right straight through the dirt.
Simple tube!
Might be just tube.

Just a simple tube running through the dirt?

Hmmm might have something there...

Originally posted by anathema777
What pictures are you reffering to that Johns excited about exactly bud?

The Zond ones... Its okay I found the sources one Russian, one NASA and one USGS... I will post them together with images on my site tomorrow and link them...

Its really interesting though, that all of a sudden, like the Clementine Color images, these sold Russian images suddenly appear on multiple websites....

John is right there are LOTS of things to find...

Like this one (first draft but I couldn't wait....)

www.putfile.com...
meh, zoom to the red areas with something that lets you zoom in closer. this is my first impression. i would have used a better paint program, but i am not onmy computer now.
i went to college for art/graphic design, i tried to look at it as a disgruntled government employee, who does a "shabby" job of his airbrushing- i would leave clues all over the page.


[edit on 28-2-2007 by jetflock]

[edit on 28-2-2007 by jetflock]

[edit on 28-2-2007 by jetflock]

Originally posted by jetflock
i went to college for art/graphic design,

well when you get back on your computer drop me a line...

That photo has a lot more work to do on it seems we got sidetracked with all kinds of other images....

One of your red squares is this one... h and BTW that image has missed the airbrushers... seems the negative escaped...





The anomalies we found in the early days of this thread are cataloged here
COPERNICUS GRID MAP

And I still haven't had time to work on C#3 and C#4 in detail yet

Originally posted by TheBorg
Might also be where they stuck two pictures together. Just a thought.

TheBorg

ARRGGGGG I knew someone was going to say that

No its not I will post the bigger area later. At least you didn't say a crack in the rock