It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Strangerous
Hmm the UN doesn't agree with the US's 'gotta bomb someone' stance and all of a sudden it's useless.
I agree, discussion and concensus are such out-moded concepts - why not bomb the UN or better still just invade every country then the mighty US can make all the decisions in the world and protect us all from ourselves.
[edit on 1/9/2006 by Strangerous]
Originally posted by Strangerous
That's OK I don't mind your patronising tone & condescending attitude.
The OP says the UN is worthless because it won't bow to the US's will, I'm merely pointing out there's an 's' on the end of Nations - ie it's not just about the US, or just backing up the US's view.
Criticism of the UN seems to rise in direct proportion to the UN's disagreement with the US's policy desires
Has it occurred to you that the US could be wrong and China/Russia might be right?
Currently the US/UK view is in a minority in terms of Security Council Permanent members and yet the US is pushing for sanctions as a prelude to military action - does that sound at all familiar?
Originally posted by 11Bravo
Where to begin...
The UN isnt useless, you just dont understand what its use is.
Every American, nay, every Human, should fear the UN, yet there seems to be widespread support on this board for them.
The UN is just the name of the bus that we are all riding in, on our way to hell. Its time some of you stopped looking out the window at the world go by and ask some real questions.
Questions like where are we going? How long until we get there? Who is driving this thing? Who payed for the gas and so on.....
Originally posted by Strangerous
Fundamentally disagree - I think the US (with attendant poodle Blair) is the greatest single threat to peace & stability on this planet.
We're already upto our knees in the blood of one illegal war/occupation, the US's tame Nazi rottweiler has just drenched another nation in cluster bombs on the flimsiest of pretexts and now you want to attack another country that just so happens to have oil and trading agreements with your economic rivals.
The concensus of the UN is that the US is wrong in its desperation to launch part 2 of the crusade before your educationally subnormal president has to leave office.
I back the UN
Now, do you understand my point?
Originally posted by Strangerous
I back the UN
Now, do you understand my point?
UN Res. 1696
The Security Council, seriously concerned that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was still unable to provide assurances about Iran’s undeclared nuclear material and activities after more than three years, today demanded that Iran suspend all enrichment-related and reprocessing activities, including research and development, and gave it one month to do so or face the possibility of economic and diplomatic sanctions to give effect to its decision.
Adopting resolution 1696 (2006), under Chapter VII, by a vote of 14 in favour to 1 against (Qatar), the Council expressed its conviction that such suspension, as well as full, verified Iranian compliance with the IAEA Board of Governor’s requirements, would contribute to a diplomatic, negotiated solution that guaranteed Iran’s nuclear programme was for exclusively peaceful purposes.
Originally posted by MasterRegal
I understand your point that you support the UN and you hate the government of the U.S and its policies.
1. Do NOT put words in my mouth. I NEVER said I will like to attack Iran. In fact, I said that was the worst possible option. Read my post completely before you reply.
2. I agree that the Iraq was illegal based on UN Charter and there is no fighting you there, but that is not the argugment of this topic.
3. Do I care if Iran and China have economic ties with Iran, of course not, business is business.
4. Do I agree with what Israel did? NO!
But tell me this now, if the UN functioned the way it should why do the hosts to illegal wars go unpunished? Because it does not function the way it should, it is controlled by money and politics. Understand what I am trying to say here? It is the whole point of the point. The usefulness of the UN. Granted, there are things which it does nicely, but it lacks so much.
Originally posted by MasterRegal
While I agree that the UN has been useless in many situations, sanctions will NOT end Iran's defiance. You must understand that Iran will not give in to world, no matter how much pressure there is. Politics always weigh heavier than what is right, and that's a problem that is growing constantly. I'm not happy with the way Russia and China is dealing with the situation, they hold very important ties with Iran, but as of now there is nothing we can do, but sit back and see how it unfolds.