It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Polite Demotion Planned for Planet Pluto
In June, we broke the news that astronomers might get the chance to vote in September on a new definition for the word “planet,” a wording that will be proposed by a panel that includes historians, educators and other non-astronomers.
Yesterday, NPR’s David Kestenbaum did some nifty digging into what that definition might be. Several of the panel members favor dividing round objects up as terrestrial planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars), giant planets (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune) and a third class that would include Pluto, NPR reported. “We’ll call them dwarf planets or something,” said Iwan Williams, an astronomer at the University of London who served on the panel, according to NPR.
[...]
If all goes as it should—meaning if astronomers can put aside their quibbles and vote “yes”—in 20 years Pluto will probably still be popular with children, but rather than being known as the 9th planet, it’ll be known as the first object ever discovered in that sea of dozens or maybe even hundreds of dwarf planets that will have been found by then.
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
Also, Mercury has more in common with the other terrestial planets, while Pluto has more in common with the other KBOs.
Originally posted by Umbrax
I wonder if these definitions will stick once we start mapping other solar systems.
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
Can you explain your reasoning for this?
Originally posted by deltaboy
Doesn't Pluto orbit our Sun along with other planets like Earth? That should be considered a planet.
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
That's kind of an off statement as well... The asteroids, comets, and everything else orbits the Sun as well. If you're using that as your only requirement, then everything in the Solar System (save the Sun, mind you) could be called a planet.
Originally posted by apc
Indeed, "easily".
But, Im sure the search went on.
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
if I remember correctly, Pluto is smaller than our own moon.
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
This is great news. Pluto was only considered a planet at the time of its discovery because we had very little knowledge of what was out there. Now, if it were discovered today, it would be lumped into the mass of freshly discovered Kuiper Belt Objects. Of course, the new definition is likely to include a new definition for those, as well.
Polite Demotion Planned for Planet Pluto
In June, we broke the news that astronomers might get the chance to vote in September on a new definition for the word “planet,” a wording that will be proposed by a panel that includes historians, educators and other non-astronomers.
Yesterday, NPR’s David Kestenbaum did some nifty digging into what that definition might be. Several of the panel members favor dividing round objects up as terrestrial planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars), giant planets (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune) and a third class that would include Pluto, NPR reported. “We’ll call them dwarf planets or something,” said Iwan Williams, an astronomer at the University of London who served on the panel, according to NPR.
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
[...]
If all goes as it should—meaning if astronomers can put aside their quibbles and vote “yes”—in 20 years Pluto will probably still be popular with children, but rather than being known as the 9th planet, it’ll be known as the first object ever discovered in that sea of dozens or maybe even hundreds of dwarf planets that will have been found by then
Looks like we'll have to wait another month or so, but I hope that this change does indeed happen. Of course, poor Clyde will no doubt turn over a few times in his grave.