It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Designed as a gigh-performance fighter with a fly-by-wire control system, the highly manoverable Su-27 is one of the most imposing fighters ever built. The first "Flanker-A" prototype flew on 20 may 1977 and entered service as the "Flanker-B" in 1984.The development of the Su-27 fighter was completed in the early 1980s, and the aircraft subsequently set mroe than 40 world records of altitudeand take-off speeds. It was a forerunner of an entire family of fighter aircraft, including the Su-27UB training variant, the Su-33 carrier-based fighter, the Su-37 multi-mission aircraftand the su-32FN two-seat spezialized version. The Su-27UB is a two-seated training version of the Su-27 wich first flew in march 1985. The aircraft is equipped to operate autonomously in combat over hostile territory, as an escort to deep-penetration strike aircraft, and in the supression of enemy airfields. The Flanker also provides general air defence on cooperation with ground and airborne control stations. The su-27 is in service with Russia, Ukraine, Belraus, kazakhsta and Vietnam, and is built udner license in China, where it is designated the F-11. A variant, the Su-20MK, has also been sold to india where licensed loca production began in 2000. There is no doubt that the Flanker is one of the most potent warplanes in service.
And if we are comparing the spefications, it is clear that the enignes of the Su-27 are without a match, same with speed and ceiling.
Su-27
Thrust: 12.500 kg (in each egnine)
Maximum Speed: 2500 km/h
Ceiling: 18500 m
F-22
Thrust: 15.909 kg (in each engine)
Maximum Speed: 1600-1800km/h
Ceiling: 16600 m
F/A-18
Thrust:14.545 kg (in each engine)
Maximum speed: 2082 km/h
Ceiling:15240m
Originally posted by NotheRaGe
AL-31 engine produces 25 000kg of thrust?
combataircraft.com
This source say that AL-31F produces up to more than 12 000kg(27000-lb) of thrust, compared to F-119's 35 000-lb, which is more than 15 000kg. The F-16's F110-GE-129 and F100-PW-229 are also slightly better than the AL-31, producing 29,000-lb of thrust.
Originally posted by Figher Master FIN
However it prooves that the plane can go much faster even though the engines are about the same...
Originally posted by NotheRaGe
AL-31 engine produces 25 000kg of thrust?
combataircraft.com
Originally posted by chinawhite
I think its purpose was to say combined thrust.
Originally posted by vishu
idont know much about, acceleration , speed and all, but lets face it no aircraft beats the sukhois as far as manouverability is concerned. i mean if theres a dogfight between between a raptor and a Su-30, i'll place my money on the sukhoi.
provided both pilots are equally well-trained.
for me >>> nothn like a sukhoi
Originally posted by Figher Master FIN
The book clearly states it is 25.00 kg in each engine.
About the F-22 cervice ceiling, Indeed it is impossible to know. but you can always speculate, and 50.000 feet is a good guess.
And JFrazier you said "The speed restriction on the the F-22 is mainly due to airframe materials". Indeed, but it isn't built of lighter materlias, so it's useless to speculate about possible speeds.
Originally posted by vishu
idont know much about, acceleration , speed and all, but lets face it no aircraft beats the sukhois as far as manouverability is concerned. i mean if theres a dogfight between between a raptor and a Su-30, i'll place my money on the sukhoi.
provided both pilots are equally well-trained.
for me >>> nothn like a sukhoi
Originally posted by xmotex
I was under the impression that the limiting factor in the F-22's top speed was the intakes, not aerodynamic heating. IIRC the designers chose to optmize the intakes for stealth, sacrificing some top speed in the bargain.
Originally posted by JFrazier
The materials make a big difference because composities, used extensively in the Raptor, usually don't hold up to the high temperatures of Mach 2+ as well as metal(aluminum, titanium, steel). Without those restrictions, I have no doubt that the F-22 would have a faster topspeed than both the F-15 and Su-27. Program leaders have stated that it is way too easy for pilots to reach VMax at sea level.
Secondly, if I was speculating, I have seen reports of the serivice ceiling for the F-22 at around 60,000 feet as pilots have stated that they have been able to supercruise at that altitiude.
The Su-27 is much closer to the F-15 than the F-22 and Eurofighter. It's main advantage lies in its large airframe which allows it to carry more fuel than almost any other fighter. This also makes it much more visible to radars however. In terms of accleration I'd put it behing the F-22 and Eurofighter. The F-22 has been known to pull away from F-15s in military thrust while the F-15s where in afterburner.
BTW, the F-15s top speed is stated as being 2,655km/h. The F-22 also has a much better T/W ratio than the Su-27 only adding to its advantages.
[edit on 9-7-2006 by JFrazier]
Originally posted by Waynos
I think another limiting factor on the F-22 vmax is its sheer volume. as I said on another thread, its centre section is a huge box that accommodates all its main weapons load internally, this must have an adverse effect on velocity because of the sheer volume of air that has to be moved out of the way as it progresses. This is much more than the volume that has to be moved for an aircraft with external weapons and must have an adverse effect on top speed.
However this is only a feeling I have as I am no aerodynamiscist, maybe someone like kilcoo could clarify this for me?