It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jbondo
John,
What about that pesky problem of growing mass whilst traveling at this high rate of speed? Did I miss how that problem was solved?
Besides, wouldn't the wormhole theory of travel be much more feasible than traveling at or faster than TSOL?
Originally posted by HardToGet
I thought the whole deal of using 115 was that you can curve space in such a way that you "pull" your destination towards you and restore space once you are at the apex of the curvature, having effectively arrived at your destination without moving. Pull and hop.
John, did Bob ever discuss that with you?
EDIT: Described here
User: papoose
Pass: sector
[edit on 7-7-2006 by HardToGet]
.
1.Does the density.. or almost lack of it.. in space have an effect on the human body.ie momentum .when these single hydrogen atoms are so compressed that 1000, of miles of ''space'' are sucked into a small area the released instantaneously..I thought the compression of the atoms would maybe cause a ''gravity well'' maybe a few G,s anyhoo
2.Do you give PPL flying lessons..Currently swotting up on my FAA rules and regulations while i,m over here. but want to take test in USA cuz it,s a lot cheaper.!!
Originally posted by johnlear
sorry, retired 6 years ago. Let all my certificates lapse, my medical lapse, my bienniel lapse, all my aviation subcriptions lapse...heck I don't even look up anymore...
And the bigger problems.
Already mentioned by someone, as an object approaches the speed of light, its mass approaches infinity, as long as e=mc2 holds.
I have to look up my Gravity Amplification 101 text book, I just can't remember how its done. The 'speed' of gravity increases 32ft/sec/sec until terminal velocity is reached and I am not sure how antimatter would get it even up to the speed of light.
Originally posted by johnlear
The 'speed' of gravity is instantaneous throughout the universe. But since neither of us has a way of measuring that gravity is 'instantaneous' throughout the universe we'll just have to wait, as did the 'flat earth proponets' until its proven one way or the other. I'll keep my money on 'instantaneous gravity'. Thanks.
Originally posted by g210
Originally posted by johnlear
The 'speed' of gravity is instantaneous throughout the universe. But since neither of us has a way of measuring that gravity is 'instantaneous' throughout the universe we'll just have to wait, as did the 'flat earth proponets' until its proven one way or the other. I'll keep my money on 'instantaneous gravity'. Thanks.
you mean the force not the speed. (The speed is most probabily instantanious)
g210: I would respectfully request that you do not attempt to put words in my mouth. It’s demeaning. It implies that I am mis-stating myself. If you wish to ask if I meant to say a particular thing then please do so. But do not say “You mean the force not the speed.” The implication being that you know better what I am trying to say.
It is my opinion that the gravitational flux is instantaneous throughout the universe. The gravity of earth has an instantaneous effect on a star in the farthest reaches. That’s how a gravity phone works. A gravity phone is hooked up to the gravity wave or flux and you can talk to someone a thousand light years away instantaneously. That’s how ‘remote viewing’ works. You are ‘hooking up’ to the gravitational flux throughout the universe. There is no current, mainstream, scientific way of measuring the speed or flux of gravity. Or, put another way: the way we are currently measuring the speed of gravity is similar to a proponent of ‘flat earth’ taking you on a walk around earth. “See! See! I told you, everywhere you look the earth is FLAT!” These are my opinions and they are based on things I have heard and seen. They are not ‘scientific fact”.
‘Scientific Fact’, in my opinion, is the psychological prison that keeps new and wondrous ideas from emerging. With few exceptions, scientists are not willing to discuss theories and ideas that are not signed, sealed and stamped by their peers. They are afraid of ridicule, including unfavorable peer review and which includes a diminishing paycheck.
Thanks for your input on this thread.
There is still the problem of Bob Lazard's - sorry, PHYSICIST Bob Lazard's, I didn't mean any disrespect (or did I??) - claims about an alpha particle shooting off from the lantern mantle and entering 115. Did he have a really big hammer to pound it into ununpentium nucleus? Help me out here!
Just to give you an example, a couple of the scientists I work with are involved in the newly formed Tau Zero Foundation who's goal is exploring enabling technology for interstellar flight...
Originally posted by johnlear
g210: I would respectfully request that you do not attempt to put words in my
...