It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SIRR1
I just wonder if he was killed to keep him silent
The water fuel cell was claimed to produce several times more energy than it consumed
Originally posted by Aelita
Case closed
Originally posted by Communication_Monster
Originally posted by Aelita
Case closed
No. If they killed him then I would expect to see something like that edited onto Wikipedia. I think there is evidence to suggest his devices pretty much did what they were claimed to do. I'm not saying I am 100% positive this particular device of his worked, but I'm pretty damn sure. Take a look at the video provided if you haven't already.
[edit on 25-5-2006 by Communication_Monster]
Originally posted by Aelita
Look, the materials I find on the web all point to the claim that energy was not conserved. This is the most interesting part of the alleged invention.
It's not just Wikipedia.
Originally posted by Aelita
I do not believe in energy non-conservation on that scale. It was never observed in physics experiments of extreme variety and precision.
Originally posted by Aelita
All the wording in the descriptions of the invention is intended to make the reader believe that since "resonance" is employed, it is easier to break down the molecule. The energy conservation part is at this juncture quetly swept under the rug.
Originally posted by Communication_Monster
Originally posted by Aelita
I do not believe in energy non-conservation on that scale. It was never observed in physics experiments of extreme variety and precision.
There is your preconceived conclusion that you are fitting your research around. I might add, that if there actually is a conspiracy here of the nature implied (and I mean the bigger picture, not just this guys murder) then it's no real wonder why "It was never observed in physics experiments of extreme variety and precision", is it? You haven't seen it happen, that doesn't mean it hasn't happened, does it now?
Originally posted by SIRR1
Stan Meyer, the man who invented an economical way to produce
hydrogen from everyday tap water was found dead in his home.
posted by FlyersFan
posted by SIRR1
Stan Meyer, the man who invented an economical way to produce hydrogen from everyday tap water was found dead in his home.
I couldn't get the video. Would someone please tell me how this man died. The title says 'murdered'. How? Where? Thank you. F/F
[Edited by Don W]
From the video clip: “ . . Water can be broken into Hydrogen and Oxygen using electricity. Standard chemistry books claim that this process requires more energy than can be recovered. This is true only under the worst case scenario. When water is hit with its own molecular resonant frequency . . “
“ . . using a system developed by Stan Meyers, it collapses into Hydrogen and Oxygen gas with very little electrical input. It is also known that certain geometric structures and surface textures work better than others do. The implication is that unlimited amounts of Hydrogen fuel can be made to drive engines for the cost of water.”
Even more amazing is the fact that a special metal alloy was patented by Freedman in 1957 that spontaneously breaks water into Hydrogen and Oxygen with no outside electrical input and without causing any chemical changes in the metal itself.
[Edited by Don W]
Originally posted by polanksi
lonelatern.org
Has some video about his car. Supposedly after his invention he was asked to work for the pentagon, perhaps DARPA if it existed then, and he graciously accepted. He died during a toast, his drink was poisoned.
waterpoweredcar.com...
He was apparently eating dinner at a Grove City OH restaurant, when it is reported that he jumped up from the table, yelled that he'd been poisoned", and rushed out into the parking lot, where he collapsed and died. It has been reported by Meyer's associates that Meyer had just secured funding for a $50 million research center near Grove City, but there is no way to confirm or reject this at the moment.
Stanley A. Meyer, the controversial Ohio inventor who had claimed his technology could produce a hydrogen-oxygen mixture with a minimal energy input (compared with conventional electrolysis) died on March 21, 1998. He did not have a world-wide following, like he should have, few people have heard of him. There were also those of adherents and people who had invested in his activities --- Water Fuel Cell (Grove City, OH). He was famous for his claimed "water fueled car" which was exhibited symbolically in the BBC/CBC 1994 documentary on cold fusion, "Too Close to the Sun". We were initially curious about Meyer's work, the late Christopher Tinsley of the UK, and the late Admiral of the British Navy, Sir Anthony Griffin, but who became frustrated by being unable --- or, more to the point, not allowed --- to confirm (or reject) Meyer's claims.
It makes no sense that after discovering the technological process that he had. Why there is no way that a reasonable, straightforward marketing strategy would have failed to make his technology quickly spread worldwide. There remains a very strong suspicion that he had no such process, from his enemies, (Oil Corp. Cartels) even though he conducted a demonstration (before this writer and another engineer at the Meyer lab in 1993) of the production of copious hydrogen/oxygen gas from what visually seemed like a small input power. But Meyer was exceedingly paranoid and he flatly refused reasonable requests by us and others to test the performance --- the input/out power ratio, even with the proviso that we did not have to "look into his black box" of electronics feeding his rather simply constructed stainless steel electrode, alternating current and voltage cell. The last such refusal --- this one in public and recorded on video tape --- was at the ANE meeting in Denver CO in 1997. Then Meyer loudly and falsely protested that he would "lose his patent rights" if he were to release anything but complete, integrated systems --- such as a water-fueled vehicle.
Can Someone Spell Gullible
Originally posted by donwhite
Uh oh! Watch this “resonant frequency” stuff. That’s straight out of sci-fi. Maybe a good read, bu nothing you’d want to put your money into. Nikolai Tesla - the man who developed alternating current - went off on a tangent trying to find the resonant frequency of the earth.
Originally posted by LazarusTheLong
i gotta say...
anyon who invents something of THIS proportion, needs to not be so paranoid about letting the secret out...
He wont go broke as so many lesser inventors did...
hell, i would send him $100 a month, just for thanks of saving the world...
I dont beleive that it really worked, or he would have had this puppy pushed into the media on a wide scale...
i think the mysterious black box, is the true source of his electricty... not the source he showed... (maybe he felt that using rechargable batteries wasn't cheating)
I have also found a proclivity of these mysterious black boxes connected to perpetual motion machines, and other electrical heresies.
I think it must be a common con, much like the dissapearing statue of liberty...
the only question that would debunk it, is if everyone in the live audience was in on it (which they were)
in this case... the only thing you have to take for granted, is that the little black box didn't provide extra energy...
why would we beleive that? do we know him personally? do we see that he had bunches of other scientific inventions that aren't related?
The mysterious box, is the only conspiracy here...
I do beleive that gas engines have much inefficiency, and can be 80% better than they are... but we have to figure out creative ways to reclaim the wasted energy...
not try to create mysterious energy, from a mysterious magic box.