It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by waynos
edit; just seen the tag someone added. A plane being missed by the defenders does not make it stealthy you know. It happens all the time
Originally posted by benevolent tyrant
If anything, they should be apologizing for such actions NOT "bragging" about it.
Originally posted by Zion Mainframe
Yeah, I doubt the TU-160 is that stealthy, which is why I asked if anyone knows more about the upgrade program.
The Russian Air Force is planning a limited upgrade for the Tu-160 fleet. The first stage of the upgrade will equip the aircraft with the conventional armed Kh-101 and Kh-555 cruise missiles, as well as the new Sigma fire control system for these missiles. The Tu-160 will carry up to 12 of the Kh-101, which uses a electro-optical terminal homing system. The Kh-555 is a reworked Kh-55SM, which uses the Kh-101 homing system and replaces the nuclear warhead with a conventional one. The Tu-160 upgrade also adds the Kh-102 strategic missile, medium range subsonic Kh-SD and the Kh-41 medium range supersonic weapon. Other upgrades include navigation, communication and self-defence systems. The upgrades, carried out by KAPO at Kazan, extend the service life of the Tu-160 until at least 2020-2025. The first two Tu-160 bombers carrying conventional cruise missiles will be stationed at the Air Force base near Engels in the Saratov region in 2005.
Originally posted by Primary Mover
Don't believe all you read in the media stealth wise its just an illusion, the Russians have control of a steatlh technology the we have yet to grasp.
Originally posted by cohiba
I'm open to believe that Russia has more advanced technologies than the United States, but I would like to see some evidence.
Originally posted by Daedalus3
Originally posted by cohiba
I'm open to believe that Russia has more advanced technologies than the United States, but I would like to see some evidence.
Are you limiting the want of evidence to stealth or are you generalising this to a broader perspective, i.e. all military/scientific tech?
Originally posted by waynos
But the thread is not about stealth technology at all.
It is about some bombers managing to stay undetected, or do you assume that this is only possible with use of stealth technology?
It is much more likely that it was achieved through simple human or mechanical fallibity on the part of NORAD plus maybe some expert planning and flying by the Russians.
Originally posted by kilcoo316
Scratch one for plasma stealth?
Its possible isn't it....
Originally posted by cohiba
I assume nothing. I doubt the validity of the claim this happened at all. If it did happen, I would most certainly tend to lean in the direction of human and/or mechanical error as an explanation.
If it happened...