It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
REUTERS: Negotiations between Iran and Russia on the Iranian nuclear programme have made no significant progress despite talk of an outline agreement by both sides, the German and French foreign ministers said on Monday.
"It appears that no decisive progress has been achieved," German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier told reporters, citing reports from Moscow, after EU ministers discussed the negotiations at their monthly meeting in Brussels.
He said Iran appeared to be using the talks to try to divide the international community, but "this will not be successful".
They may experience much less soon (in the form of sanctions) if the UN Security Council does the unexpected and resists its traditional urge to flounder, delay and prolong the process to the point that it’s eventual resolutions are nearly ineffectual. With Russia’s nuclear construction contracts and China’s recent massive oil and gas agreements with Tehran, effectiveness may have an outside chance at best, regardless of proven Iranian deception.
Originally posted by Oilbourse2006
ThreatsWatch.org
They may experience much less soon (in the form of sanctions) if the UN Security Council does the unexpected and resists its traditional urge to flounder, delay and prolong the process to the point that it’s eventual resolutions are nearly ineffectual. With Russia’s nuclear construction contracts and China’s recent massive oil and gas agreements with Tehran, effectiveness may have an outside chance at best, regardless of proven Iranian deception.
The world needs a united front but with Russia and China having both hands in the pie, trying to get a united front is going to be difficult at best.
Plus I was thinking about it, "if I wanted a nuclear option for energy only what would I do??
1) Arrange a meeting with my secretary of energy (discuss options)
2) Go to IAEA and explain situation, (need nuke energy to cope with large demand forecast in next 5 years say)
3) Be completely transparent with IAEA, do exactly what they say.
4) Do not say I am going to destroy another country nor sponsor terrorism
Wouldnt these be anyones thoughts if it was indeed peaceful??
In 1939, the Nazis were rumored to be developing an atomic bomb. The United States initiated its own program under the Army Corps of Engineers in June 1942. America needed to build an atomic weapon before Germany or Japan did.
On Monday, July 16, 1945, at 5:29:45 a.m., the first atomic device detonated at the Trinity Test Site
The agreement in principle with Russia for uranium enrichment is a positive step Iran took to remove the standoff on national nuclear program, a Western diplomat at International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said on Monday.
IRNA reporter in Vienna asked the diplomat whether he was aware of the report IAEA Director General Mohamed ElBaradei is expected to present to the Board of Governors on March 6, he replied 'no', adding that if ElBaradei's report was positive, there will be no reason for the UN Security Council to study the report.
He said that Iran is far away from economic sanctions thanks to satisfactory Iranian cooperation with the UN nuclear agency.
Iran is forging ahead with nuclear enrichment by feeding uranium gas into centrifuge "cascades", a report by the United Nations' nuclear watchdog says.
But the next day Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said any deal depended on Iran ending its own enrichment activities.
Iranian officials had warned they would restart small-scale uranium enrichment by early March but they did not specify a date.
The head of the world's nuclear watchdog declared last night that he could not give Iran's nuclear programme a clean bill of health, blaming Tehran for frustrating almost three years of inspections and detective work by experts from the International Atomic Energy Agency.
And just a few months down the road, "commencement of the installation of the first 3,000 ... (centrifuges) is planned for the fourth quarter of 2006," said the report.
Experts estimate that Iran already has enough black-market components in storage to build the 1,500 operating centrifuges it would need to make the 45 pounds of highly enriched uranium needed for one crude weapon.
Originally posted by KhieuSamphanAs I say, it depends who you listen to!
---[snip]---
The report also repeated appeals for Iran to cooperate that have been a staple of the more than a dozen documents produced by ElBaradei on the status of the probe into Tehran's nuclear program.
Detailing some of Iran's foot dragging over the past month, as well as new findings of concern, the report said:
- "Iran again declined to provide" a copy of a document located earlier by IAEA inspectors showing how to cast fissile uranium into the shape to fit a warhead.
- There were "inconsistencies" in tests of plutonium isotopes provided to the agency to help it look into plutonium separation experiments in the mid-1990s, suggesting that not all plutonium had been accounted for.
---[snip]---
"Without full transparency ... the agency's ability to reconstruct the history of Iran's past program and verify the correctness and completeness of statements made by Iran ... will be limited and questions about the past and current direction of Iran's nuclear program will continue to be raised."……….
Gas centrifuges are one way of enriching uranium.
Iran already has 164 centrifuge machines installed at its pilot centrifuge plant at Natanz, but that is only a fifth of the total it needs before it is fully operational.
The commercial-scale facility could ultimately house as many as 50,000 centrifuges, according to some estimates.
Mark Fitzpatrick, senior fellow for non-proliferation at the IISS, says Iran has another 1,000 centrifuges dating to before it temporarily suspended enrichment in 2003. But these have not been tested to ensure they still work.
Tehran might possibly have parts for a further 1,000 centrifuges, Mr Fitzpatrick told the BBC News website.
Frank Barnaby, consultant for the UK security think tank the Oxford Research Group, agrees that Iran does not yet have a critical number of centrifuges in place.
"They don't currently have enough centrifuges working - so far as we know - to produce significant amounts of highly-enriched uranium or even enriched uranium. They would need a lot more," he told the BBC News website.
Even if the plant is made fully operational, it is currently configured to produce low enriched uranium (LEU) rather than the weapons-grade highly-enriched uranium (HEU).
So given these limitations, the IISS believes it would take Iran at least a decade to produce enough HEU for a single nuclear weapon.
Dr Barnaby agrees.
"The CIA says 10 years to a bomb using highly enriched uranium and that is a reasonable and realistic figure in my opinion," he said.....
......Iran could alternatively use plutonium to produce nuclear weapons, but this route is also problematic for Tehran, analysts say.
Plutonium can be produced as a by-product of fission carried out by Iran's Russian-built nuclear power reactor at Bushehr.
The IISS says Iran would need to build a reprocessing plant suited to the fuel used in Bushehr and this would be very technically challenging.
But according to Dr Barnaby, useful reprocessing could be carried out over a short period using a suitably equipped chemical laboratory.
Iran is also constructing a heavy-water research reactor at Arak, which Dr Barnaby says would "very efficiently produce plutonium of the sort that is good for nuclear weapons."
But this will not be ready until at least 2014, and probably later, the IISS has said.
To be used in a reactor, uranium must contain 2-3% U-235
Weapons grade or highly enriched uranium (HEU) has a concentration of at least 90% U-235
Iran call for nuclear-free region
Ahmadinejad is the first Iranian leader to go to Kuwait since 1979
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has called for the Middle East to be free of nuclear weapons.
Speaking after talks with Kuwaiti leaders, Mr Ahmadinejad said nuclear weapons were a threat to stability.
He said Iran was a good neighbour, and reiterated that its nuclear programme was for peaceful, civilian purposes.
Gulf Arab states, including Kuwait, have said they want an agreement with Iran to keep the Gulf region free of nuclear weapons.
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
......or is it just drooling over the prospect of more death and destruction that gets some folks so worked up around here, hmmmmm?
Originally posted by kojac
There will be no sanctions worth mentioning. China will see to that with their veto.
IMO Iran will continue to drag the scenario long enough to confound the international community. And well done to them, they have the rest of the world dancing a merry jig to their tune.
I see Iran getting what they want, regardless as to international approval.
Iran says its plans are peaceful, but Mr ElBaradei said he could not be sure.
…
Mr ElBaradei said it was regrettable that questions over Iran's nuclear programme remained unanswered "after three years of intensive agency verification".
…
The report said that although inspectors had not seen any diversion of nuclear materials, they were not in a position to conclude that there were "no undeclared nuclear materials or activities in Iran".
"There's no deal, frankly, that I'm aware of," said deputy state department spokesman Adam Ereli.
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey......or is it just drooling over the prospect of more death and destruction that gets some folks so worked up around here, hmmmmm?
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
......or is it just drooling over the prospect of more death and destruction that gets some folks so worked up around here, hmmmmm?