It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In London, a former prisoner at Guantanamo told a demonstration outside the U.S. Embassy that guards at the camp had mistreated his Quran.
"This was one of the methods they used, throwing the Quran, my Quran, on the floor in my cell. This was in the first month at Camp Delta but it is not something that stopped, rather continued and increased," said Martin Mubanga, who was released from the prison in January.
"It's a shame we have had to wait for a magazine to publish and then retract a story concerning the treatment of the Quran," Mubanga said.
He spoke as about 200 protesters gathered outside the embassy, chanting "kill, kill George Bush" and other anti-American slogans. Many in the crowd covered their faces with scarves. A man with a megaphone led chants including "USA watch your back, Osama is coming back" and "bomb, bomb New York."
www.boston.com...
Their demonstration was held Friday near the steps of the embassy in Grosvenor Square, which was guarded by a small detail of police.
A British policeman said the language was offensive and unpleasant in the extreme. But police overlooked that and the fact that more than a few of the young men in the crowd covered their faces, technically a violation of British law, according to the police.
Shouting, "Down, down USA; down, down USA," the protesters called for the killing of Americans, the death of the U.S. president, the death of British Prime Minister Tony Blair, the bombing of Britain, and the annihilation of the U.S. capital: "Nuke, nuke Washington; Nuke, nuke Washington! Bomb, bomb the Pentagon."
Some of the militant Islamic rhetoric smacked of incitement to commit murder, CNN's Senior International Correspondent Walter Rodgers reported. "Death, death Tony Blair; death, death Tony Blair. Death, death George Bush," the protesters chanted.
"The only language we speak today is the language of jihad," said one protester.
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
well, i agree this is a good time for 'peaceful' muslims to stand up. I however do not believe there are any by any definition of the word. Any religion that commands you to kill people who do not follow your faith is evil.
Originally posted by devilwasp
There are more than just english people in the UK........we are a united kingdom...
Originally posted by devilwasp
There are more than just english people in the UK........we are a united kingdom...
1. It is the inviolability of the Qur'an: not to touch the book or text of Qur'an except in the state of ritual purity in ablution (wuzu) Allah the Supreme states “None may touch it, except with ablution.” [Surah Waqiah -79] It is however permissible to touch books of Sacred Law (Shari'ah), Hadith, or Qur'anic tafsir, provided that most of their text is not Qur'an. 2. Not to recite it when in need of obligatory bath. 3. It is unlawful (haraam) for someone requiring a compulsory bath (ghusl) to touch the Qur'an, even if it the Book is in a cover. Allah the Supreme states “None may touch it, except with ablution.” [Waqiah -79] 4. When one finishes reading the Qur'an, not to leave it open. 5. Not to place other books upon the Qur'an, which should always be higher than all other books, whether they are books of Sacred Knowledge or something else. 7. Not to wipe it from a slate with spittle, but rather wash it off with water; and if one washes it off with water, to avoid putting the water where there are unclean substances or where people walk. 8. When writing the Qur'an, to do so in a clear, elegant hand. 9. Not to write it on the ground or on walls, as is done in some new mosques. 10. When passing it to someone, pass it with respect. Not to toss or throw it towards someone. 11. Not to enter the lavatory carrying the Holy Qur’an. This is a great sin – and if done so on purpose, it is Kufr (blasphemy).
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
Good for you!
but it happened in London, so who cares about the rest of the UK!
Originally posted by mpeake
What's your point? Is this statement in defense of what happened?
Originally posted by devilwasp
That this event involves more than england and the english, since most people dont know the geography of thier allies at all it does get quite anoying.
[edit on 26/02/2005 by devilwasp]
Originally posted by devilwasp
Heh london may be in england but it still involves the rest of the UK.
That this event involves more than england and the english, since most people dont know the geography of thier allies at all it does get quite anoying.
Originally posted by mpeake
I guess I'm still confused as to what your point is. Nobody said that it was all English citizens at the rally. What is there to get annoyed at?
What annoys me is the fact that stuff like this goes on with no one of the muslim faith speaking out against it.
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
What does? The not being able to protest part?
Well....maybe there are, but I didn't think there were as many protests in the other parts of the UK than there are in London. So why include them?
Most people don't know geography period.
Fortunately one of my degress is in geography (plus I have travelled all over) so I'm not in that category
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
well, i agree this is a good time for 'peaceful' muslims to stand up. I however do not believe there are any by any definition of the word. Any religion that commands you to kill people who do not follow your faith is evil.
Originally posted by devilwasp
I said this event includes the UK, I didnt say there is no right to protest or anything about that.
Then why did you use "Americans and the English aren't allowed to protest anymore"...?
Because it was in england or just a slip of the tongue...
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
But that's what my whole comment was about. The right to protest or not.
How exactly does this event, which was a protest, "include" all of the UK?
I know protests happen in countries, but how are protests included in countries? That doesn't make sense.
Are you talking about the different peoples of the UK were included in the protests? Well whoopdeedoo. I never said they weren't. Neither articles says that btw so how do you know?
That whole part of the post was written in jest, not to be taken seriously and oozing with sarcasm. I'm sorry you missed it.