It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Please meditate on this passage.
originally posted by: twistedpuppy
a reply to: RussianTroll
Please meditate on this passage.
A long time ago I had a conversation with my friend how the evil advertisers try to brainwash the masses with subliminal messages. And she made a really succinct observation; that in order to be brainwashed people must have some brains to begin with.
I admit I haven't read Goblin Sanctuary. But I watched the Lord of the Rings. I read the Orcs are just another name for goblins. If so, then the guys from the Shire didn't have such moral dilemmas like the protagonists from your story:
Please, meditate on this
originally posted by: YouSir
a reply to: RussianTroll
So...the moral of the story is that progressivism...requires labeling...to effectively...cancel...rationality...
The application of certain modifiers...as accusation of intent...where none need be present...is used to bludgeon disagreement into subservience...and progressivism wins another increment...in it's long line of incremental steps that such labeling browbeats those willing to swallow...in order to..."go along to get along"...
.Racist
.Micro aggressor
.Expropriator
And further...privileged...white...homophobic...caustic...masculine...
And the beat goes on...
And incrementalism...ushers in on tiny baby feet...and calls itself progress...when in fact it only inculcates regression...
And classism...and the antithesis of multiculturalism...and diversity...and multipolarity...
The true shame...is that populations allow themselves to be swayed by injustice...posing as justice...and make the choice to be good herd animals...as they're led by the nose to the abattoir...
Clifford D. Simak...was certainly prescient in his descriptive analysis...of those who exercise control of the narrative...
Thank you my friend...for provoking some small thought on my part...
YouSir
originally posted by: BingoMcGoof
I began reading SF in earnest in the early 60s. Heinlein and Asimov were the first, then for me came Simak. i spent several years catching up on his novels until I caught up and began waiting from year to year for his next publication. Simak was if I recall a newspaper man. He wrote columns and articles in Minneapolis if I remember correctly.
One of his strong points, along with others was that he believed that ''good'' SF needed to be rooted in concrete science. He called it something like ''realistic''? fiction, I called it ''speculative'' fiction .