It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In 2013 President Obama signed off on guidance requiring war plans, including nuclear targeting, to be “consistent with the fundamental principles of the Law of Armed Conflict”: distinction, proportionality, and precaution.
According to the report, if the full force assigned to the SIOP struck the Soviet Union, 54 percent of its total population would be killed, 108 million out of 217 million people. If the smaller alert force (bombers on 15 minutes to 2-hour alert) was used, total Soviet casualties would be 37 percent, or about 80 million. Against China, the full force would kill a smaller proportion because there was a smaller urban population: 16 percent of an estimated 650 million, or about 104 million. Poland, the site of Soviet air defense installations, would suffer over 2.5 million casualties in an attack by the full force. The casualty estimates included those caused by fallout and probably other radiation effects.
When the fireballs are low enough to suck up surface material, they can produce fallout downwind from the detonation. That material would mix with the radioactive fission products from the explosion and condense and settle out as the fireball cooled. Radiation from such fallout could cause fatal radiation illness in the short term and cancer in the long-term. With the Hiroshima and Nagasaki detonations, the fireball helped produce firestorms that seeded the clouds with radioactive ash producing the famous “black rain” effect.
Long-Classified U.S. Estimates of Nuclear War Casualties During the Cold War Regularly Underestimated Deaths and Destruction
I read that book back in the 90's. I also used to read a lot of William W Johnstone's 'Out Of the Ashes series of books too. Amazing similar to the walking dead, except no zombies and better writing and you learn survival skills to boot.
originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: ADVISOR
There's really no point in worrying about the use of nuclear weapons. If nations do start launching, that will be the end of society as we know it.
If you want a look at what it'll be, read a novel by Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle called "Lucifer's Hammer".
In that story it's a comet that hits Earth, but nuclear weapons will have the same outcome....and it is not good.
The worst-case scenario has come to pass: a nuclear strike has crippled America. Gangs, looters, and vandals have seized the streets. The decent few can only pray for a leader to protect them. Luckily, one of the survivors is Ben Raines.
Rebel mercenary, retired soldier, and tireless patriot, Raines is searching for his missing family in the aftermath of this devastating war. His relentless pursuit through the ruined cities of the west unites him with the civilians of the Resistance forces. They become his recruits for a revolutionary army dedicated to rebuilding America. Then comes the final outrage: an armed attack by government forces. With the fate of America's New Patriots hanging in the balance, Raines vows—government be damned—to survive, find his family, and lead this once great nation out of the ashes.
An excellent series written in the 80s and 90s combines apocalyptic survivalism, science fiction, and political intrigue. Ben Raines, an ex mercenary, survives a nuclear war and through his trials and tribulations creates a new country out of the the former United States that is founded on the Founding Fathers principles of less government and conservative values. If your a solid conservatives, pro military or an open minded liberal the series is a great read. Sometimes far fetched but its amazing how close the author predicted the current state of political affairs.