Vacinated under UV light

a reply to: annonentity

Luciferase was used as an indicator during laboratory testing of the lipid coating component of the Pfizer immunization. They even wrote a paper about it where they gauged the distribution of the lipid coat in various organs of test animals.

It would be functionless and more expensive to add random useless stuff, like a chemical indicator, to the immunization in production, and it wouldn't just make the forehead and the bridge of the nose glow. It would be concentrated at the injection site, and then fade rather rapidly.

Luciferase enzyme reaction has a shelf life and after a short time it just stops glowing. It's brightness fades in about 10 MINUTES. How the hell is that useful in say an airport to tell if people had been inoculated or not, beyond the last 15 minutes?

And even if there were some permanent residue (and there isn't), so what, the intended goal by governments and health organizations is to immunize the entire population, so what would it show? That they have been immunized? Pfft, there are already good records of that, and they are computerized and accessible over the Internet. You don't need some dodgy, probably wouldn't work, indicator if you can just look stuff up from the database.

Bioluminescent Firefly Luciferase Assays

I reckon that if people's foreheads and the bridge of their nose are glowing orange under UV lights, that they are probably wearing makeup to lighten, bronze, and highlight those areas.

Consider this another dumb idea from the anti-vaxxers that is totally and easily debunked.

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
a reply to: annonentity

The strongest argument for all of this being true, or potentially true is the behavior of officials and agencies and how they treated people so horribly when they promoted and executed the illegal lockdowns, cancelling people, holding businesses hostage, and all MSM companies and their owners supporting it all, plus helping it happen with their relentless propaganda.

And illegal mandates that only a few states resisted and didn't allow it. And it is still being promoted that it was all legitimate and still safe and effective.

I have some small portable UV exam lights, but haven't tried to shine them on any people I know that are jabbed.

I would like to test this out though.
People don't like UV lights being shined in their face.

But people go to dance clubs and voluntarily 'suffer' through hours and hours of UV lighting, especially if you feed them alcohol, and play doof-doof music.



And our eyes aren't that visually sensitive to UV, so I don't know how people would even know if a UV light was being shone in their eyes. If the power was great enough, there could be UV burns, but like sunburn, you wouldn't know until hours later.

originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

Just in case anyone thinks this is BS, we have a Ph.D. scientist who started checking the luminous glow reported on alternative news sites. He checked his wife out who was Vaccinated and got a positive response. He bought some expensive equipment and did some in-depth checking, The glow started to grow from the nose and spread. rumble.com...
As an aside women glow in the vaginal areas and the Aureoles, which seems to suggest a target on the reproductive system.

Makeup.



Also, people who bioluminesce around their genital areas, probably need to re-evaluate what they are doing for their personal hygiene.

a reply to: chr0nautnuets would be pointless.

You have completely ignored the fact that this was used in Vietnam and admitted to under a congressional inquiry. The point is to have a Vietnamese person glowing for two minutes is rather pointless.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Scratchpost

People tend to end up with the likes of Cataracts if their eyes are exposed to UV for prolonged periods of time.

Arc welders eye.

originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: chr0nautnuets would be pointless.

You have completely ignored the fact that this was used in Vietnam and admitted to under a congressional inquiry. The point is to have a Vietnamese person glowing for two minutes is rather pointless.

Really, how would it work?

I mean, even if they could get a human to glow, how does that indicate someone friendly to the US? Surely Vietcong could get vaccinated as easily as anyone else in their village?

I reckon you have fallen for yet another online porky, and that nothing of the kind ever happened in Vietnam, and that it was also not reported to a congressional enquiry, because it never happened.

(By the way, I did try and search for anything about this on the web, but I can't seem to find anything of the sort.)

It's like some one spouting a Doctor of Piffle (PhD) credential in these video's. Anyone can post anything. It doesn't need to be true, and because it is unmoderated, you can be fairly sure it isn't (Ockhams Razor).

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
a reply to: annonentity

I have 2 UV flashlights, 365 nanometer. It shows a lot of materials fluorescing. I'll test it out tomorrow at work on someone. Just have to avoid shining it in their eyes.

Just to clarify, I don't think this is BS at all. Those Nano lipids and other non conventional materials in the Pfizer and other jabs have all kinds of junk in them. They don't metabolize from the body, so they will be somewhere still.

Important to note, the video says look for orange fluorescence. Different things and materials, including on the human body won't be orange unless it's the right material to fluoresce orange. Makeup and cosmetics will usually be very dark, even black. Knowing this, if orange is found like in the video, it can be investigated by checking some of those jab ingredients, I'm sure there's a list and it will already be known how they fluoresce, if not will have to investigate it further. (That's how science works naysayers

)

People don't usually fluoresce any orange anywhere on the body.

People who accepted the experimental jabs that think this is BS are just scared because they gave in to tyranny.

Oh come on: The oranges of the meme.

a reply to: chr0naut

The technology that Darpa has will be top secret and years ahead of what we see day to day. Any site that alludes to it, is on the uncensored channels, the stuff is secret so no surprise there. So anyone showing the effects of this tech has to be taken on trust, usually, unsophisticated people observing the same thing from different countries have a low probability of wasting time. It is just an anomalous observation.
This stuff leaves a forensic mark because it does something in the real world. These MAC addresses are interesting and most probably are the batch number of the vaccine because when wifi addresses started way back in the day they were in the format of.000001 which would have been the first MAC addresses ever assigned. and as the devices became more numerous the numbers changed to letters. It is illegal to have an unassigned MAC address, for a civilian that is. So the fact that unassigned MAC addresses exist, there is only one agency that can get away with it no prize for who that would be. It is also interesting that the coding of these unassigned addresses doesn't clash with the millions of existing MAC addresses. But make no bones about it if you have been vaccinated among other things you have had to be chipped what else would you call it. www.bitchute.com... Problem number one is whatever way you look at it you have an operating system ready to connect, and can a random connect? it might be as innocuous as biometric data for health surveillance but I doubt it, but it is definitely something.
which was never supposed to come to light.

a reply to: annonentity

The technology that Darpa has will be top secret and years ahead of what we see day to day. Any site that alludes to it, is on the uncensored channels, the stuff is secret so no surprise there. So anyone showing the effects of this tech has to be taken on trust, usually, unsophisticated people observing the same thing from different countries have a low probability of wasting time.

And yet they leave you alone to spout your doom porn and inform on them.

You must be special.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
a reply to: annonentity

The strongest argument for all of this being true, or potentially true is the behavior of officials and agencies and how they treated people so horribly when they promoted and executed the illegal lockdowns, cancelling people, holding businesses hostage, and all MSM companies and their owners supporting it all, plus helping it happen with their relentless propaganda.

And illegal mandates that only a few states resisted and didn't allow it. And it is still being promoted that it was all legitimate and still safe and effective.

I have some small portable UV exam lights, but haven't tried to shine them on any people I know that are jabbed.

I would like to test this out though.
People don't like UV lights being shined in their face.

But people go to dance clubs and voluntarily 'suffer' through hours and hours of UV lighting, especially if you feed them alcohol, and play doof-doof music.

And our eyes aren't that visually sensitive to UV, so I don't know how people would even know if a UV light was being shone in their eyes. If the power was great enough, there could be UV burns, but like sunburn, you wouldn't know until hours later.

UV inspection lamps and even the UV flashlights? You don't just walk up to someone with those and then shine in someone's face. The light may mostly be invisible, but the lamp is pretty bright and can be seen when it's energized by turning it on. DUH??

a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

It might be better form to ask them first.

But once they are finished laughing at the reason for the request.

I'm sure plenty of vaccinated people would happily accommodate the experiment thus dispelling the notion and fears.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: chr0naut

The technology that Darpa has will be top secret and years ahead of what we see day to day.

Although that is possible, have you not noticed that other countries are ahead of the US in many areas of cutting edge defence technologies (like DARPA is supposed to be focussed upon)?

Russia, China and probably other countries, have hypersonic missiles, tested manufactured and deployed, but the US doesn't.

The USSR created and tested more powerful H bombs than the US, and their development work on the bombs was so fast that the US accused them of stealing US tech. That may even have been the case, but the Soviet nuke tech went beyond US nuke tech very-very rapidly.

The US determined that nuclear excited X-Ray lasers were not feasible or practical years ago, and yet just last week, US Congress was informed that Russia has already been deploying these in space as anti-satellite systems.

On the consumer electronics side, American companies had no commercial 5G telephony equipment, while China was already selling 5G handsets and had already deployed it across their major cities. The US equivalent offering, WiFi6, doesn't have anything like the same data carrying capacity and speeds. Also, most of the new consumer tech has been coming out of South Korea and Japan, for decades.

If DARPA had really advanced tech and has been keeping it secret, then other countries with more open and numerous research and development facilities will rocket ahead technologically. It is inevitable. So DARPA doesn't keep many secrets, and broadcasts its successes publicly.

Any site that alludes to it, is on the uncensored channels, the stuff is secret so no surprise there.

No, if it were secret, then uncensored channels would never be allowed to access the information. The truth is that people on uncensored channels can lie, and since no-one can produce evidence of their lies, they continue to bulls#it their "special access" (special bus special) to secret information.

So anyone showing the effects of this tech has to be taken on trust, usually, unsophisticated people observing the same thing from different countries have a low probability of wasting time. It is just an anomalous observation.

The gullible are not notably 'sophisticated'.

This stuff leaves a forensic mark because it does something in the real world. These MAC addresses are interesting and most probably are the batch number of the vaccine because when wifi addresses started way back in the day they were in the format of.000001 which would have been the first MAC addresses ever assigned. and as the devices became more numerous the numbers changed to letters. It is illegal to have an unassigned MAC address, for a civilian that is.

Can you point to the statute that makes it illegal? Also, you'd need to have lots of statutes to cover the legal systems of multiple countries, because sovereign states all have different laws from each other.

Also, there are software tools for generating or changing MAC addresses, and these are occasionally used to 'spoof' or virtualize an address to hide a hacker, but they also have many legitimate legal uses, which means that those tools are distributed as an integral part of most operating systems. It would be very hard to legislate effectively against that.

So the fact that unassigned MAC addresses exist, there is only one agency that can get away with it no prize for who that would be. It is also interesting that the coding of these unassigned addresses doesn't clash with the millions of existing MAC addresses. But make no bones about it if you have been vaccinated among other things you have had to be chipped what else would you call it. www.bitchute.com... Problem number one is whatever way you look at it you have an operating system ready to connect, and can a random connect? it might be as innocuous as biometric data for health surveillance but I doubt it, but it is definitely something.
which was never supposed to come to light.

The 5G telecommunications spec is designed for maximum data throughput and numerous simultaneous channels of that data. The average 5G handset can communicate on up to a theoretical 5 million channels at the same time. This means that every app can have hundreds of private channels designed to carry their own very specific types of data, and easily identified and separated from all the others.

Now the IP address space has limits and we 'ran out' of IPV4 addresses recently. This has pushed the need to upgrade to a larger model, IPV6, which has a much larger address space. In a similar way, the address space of the MAC address with alphanumerics is vast enough to mean that there are enough addresses for every single device, and then some.

If the conventional network stack was used for so many channels, a lot of bandwidth would be wasted on multiple headers and footers, a drawback of the OSI protocol stack model:

OSI protocols

So, with 5G, they needed to 'flatten' the protocol stack to trim it down. An elegant way is to simply tie the hardware layer straight to the application layer, and simply forget all the cruft in between. So, you give each channel a unique identifier that looks like the exact same format a MAC address has!

So, all these multiple 'MAC addresses', which aren't actually 'MAC addresses', are coming from people carrying 5G phones.

And, since the addresses are autogenerated in a way to ensure their uniqueness (a mash-up of all sorts of probably unique data), and are throwaway after use, they would be totally useless in trying to track someone.

originally posted by: randomtangentsrme

originally posted by: annonentity
Here is an interesting couple of reports, one from the way back days when the Cholera vaccine had a substance in it to mark friendly Vietnamese, it would make them glow under UV light.www.bitchute.com...

Then we come across this one where a presenter talks about the "Mark of the Beast" phenomenon or rather the lack of it then he suddenly seems to have found the eye of the horus phenomenon in vaccinated individuals under UV light.www.bitchute.com... It causes an orange glow on the forehead and the bridge of the nose. A great one for the conspiracy theorist as it seems that UV street lighting became all the rage, and UV scanners at airports purportedly could tell if you were vaccinated or not.I hope this does not turn out to be true like the Calimari clots and the magnetic shot sites, and the yet-to-be-debunked MAC addresses emanating from the vaccinated individuals. It looks like a lot of money was being spent on infrastructure, with regards to blue street lighting and five G. Then it seemed to have stalled what happened? along with the FEMA camps the massive stockpile of coffins owned by the CDC. Or is this all waiting in the wings ready for a "go order"? some strange # is going on when you add it all together.

I deal with UV lighting all the time. I had to get the jab 3 times to keep my job.
I personally own 6 UV fixtures.
No marks of any kind on me.
You get the usual florescence.

No mark of the beast, but having been a church musician, maybe I have some extra protections.

This is all BS.

Well, I wouldn't call it BS just because it didn't appear to work on you. It doesn't mean that it's not indeed happening to other people. That said, it's a pretty way out theory - I wouldn't put it past the crazies at the top, but I'd have to dive deep into the research to see if I really believed it.

originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: chr0naut

The technology that Darpa has will be top secret and years ahead of what we see day to day. Any site that alludes to it, is on the uncensored channels, the stuff is secret so no surprise there. So anyone showing the effects of this tech has to be taken on trust, usually, unsophisticated people observing the same thing from different countries have a low probability of wasting time. It is just an anomalous observation.
This stuff leaves a forensic mark because it does something in the real world. These MAC addresses are interesting and most probably are the batch number of the vaccine because when wifi addresses started way back in the day they were in the format of.000001 which would have been the first MAC addresses ever assigned. and as the devices became more numerous the numbers changed to letters. It is illegal to have an unassigned MAC address, for a civilian that is. So the fact that unassigned MAC addresses exist, there is only one agency that can get away with it no prize for who that would be. It is also interesting that the coding of these unassigned addresses doesn't clash with the millions of existing MAC addresses. But make no bones about it if you have been vaccinated among other things you have had to be chipped what else would you call it. www.bitchute.com... Problem number one is whatever way you look at it you have an operating system ready to connect, and can a random connect? it might be as innocuous as biometric data for health surveillance but I doubt it, but it is definitely something.
which was never supposed to come to light.

I agree with some of this. Using presently understood science to dismiss or even prove something is or isn't true, does not take into account the likelihood that the government, CIA etc. likely have technology decades ahead of anything that exists now and are hiding it. Firstly, we can't prove they do have such technology - I for one, think they do. Secondly, advanced/hidden technology is not the slightest bit of proof that this glowing thing is a thing. I for one think it's possible and wouldn't and don't dismiss it. But for me, there's no point in trying to convince anyone else about it because they have good points. I'm also not going to assume it's true, I'm just not dismissing it.

The mac addresses - now THAT is truly interesting. Sorry, but too many videos of weird things happening and no, I don't think EVERYONE made it up or faked a video. Something strange going on there for sure.

a reply to: Thefineblackharm

Here we have a French vid where a group of vaxed and unvaxed , have all devices removed and then are scanned for a Bluetooth signal. Unless deception and fraud are the reasons done purely for fun. Then this is fairly indicative that something is occurring in vaxed individuals and not the unvaxed. We know that the Vaccine was useless for its stated purpose. We can only assemble the clues as to what its real purpose was.www.bitchute.com...
For anyone on the brink let's look at Bio digital convergence from Canada.... horizons.service.canada.ca...

a reply to: annonentity

Not this again?

How gullible can you be?!!!!

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Still trying to earn your pay Carpy? the problem with the truth.... it pours through the gaps.

a reply to: annonentity

Are you suggesting someone pays me to reply to your constant stream of doom porn which is already repeated in the LOL bin?

You think I'm a shill?

Well I think you may be a CIA disinfo agent bent on trying to make CT sites look ridiculous?

Works both ways, pal?

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Come on Carpy admit it, weve all seen your instagram when the cheque has been paid in