It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

King Charles 111 Diagnosed with Cancer

page: 6
15
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 5 2024 @ 05:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: CarlLaFong

You also can't spell "aluminium" but let's not go there....


Yes, get back to splitting heirs.



posted on Feb, 5 2024 @ 07:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

My senses are on high. This is a major sign.

Prince Harry, the Duke of Essex, is now coming into picture.

When will he be crowned as the Antichrist?

I guess WIlliam will refuse kingship, because of Kate's poor health.

Harry tightens the straps of his nazi-boots. Can you hear him marching down the hall...



posted on Feb, 5 2024 @ 07:52 PM
link   
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

With regards to HRM.

Tips hat



posted on Feb, 5 2024 @ 08:18 PM
link   
a reply to: TheWhat

The Queen knew her eldest son was a trainwreck so she stayed on the throne ensuring the shortest possible reign from her wicked son.



posted on Feb, 5 2024 @ 08:21 PM
link   
a reply to: ARM19688

The late queen died of bone cancer. Color me simple but isn't that one of the registered side effects, of the AZ jab? which incidentally my cousin got after the AZ jab? If it was a mild treatable form I doubt Harry would hurry over to his father. Add in that Kate hasn't been seen since December, it might be seen as a conspirator's dream but we seem to have had a lot of death and sickness in the Royals since the rollout.Not to mention the rest of the Realm?



posted on Feb, 5 2024 @ 09:02 PM
link   
a reply to: annonentity

There are no registered side effects of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine specifically linked to bone cancer.

Aside from your doom porn nonsense.

Else links please of the credible sorts.



posted on Feb, 5 2024 @ 09:51 PM
link   
a reply to: andy06shake

The side effects are very clear and have been warned about since this fiasco started, more people would be ok if the professionals who gave the warnings were given air time and not shadowbanned.rumble.com...
I will reiterate Prince Phillip the Queen The king with cancer Kate Middleton cancer? Sarah Fergusson cancer. since the rollout How obvious does it have to be?


edit on pm2220242America/Chicago2290229 by annonentity because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 6 2024 @ 01:24 AM
link   
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Jolly bad old chap.



posted on Feb, 6 2024 @ 01:30 AM
link   
a reply to: annonentity

Liz was 96 years old when she died. It hardly came as a great shock, people that age do have a tendency to die....and you have to put something on the death certificate.
The official cause of death was 'old age'.
As far as I can tell the only source of the rumour she had bone marrow cancer is Gyles Brandreth.

She may have had it, she may not have done....but trying desperately to link it to the vax is a massive stretch and reeks of you using any given opportunity or event to push your personal anti-vax crusade.

Lame.



posted on Feb, 6 2024 @ 03:50 AM
link   
SPAM

edit on 2/6/2024 by semperfortis because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 6 2024 @ 03:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: silentbunker
I guess WIlliam will refuse kingship, because of Kate's poor health..

That's just a temporary thing.
I doubt that William would turn down the crown because his wife had surgery.



posted on Feb, 6 2024 @ 03:59 AM
link   
a reply to: annonentity

So one of the most powerful and richest families on the planet were not told that it was a poisonous vaccine they were being given

Do you believe the royal family were involved in princess Diana’s death ? If so do you not think the very same family would seek retribution against those that injected them with the poison vaccine



posted on Feb, 6 2024 @ 04:07 AM
link   
King Charles Cancer Prognosis Very Good Cancer Caught Very Early
Maybe it IS prostrate cancer after all.
Found early with the prostrate surgery.
And prostrate cancer has a very good survival rate.



posted on Feb, 6 2024 @ 04:42 AM
link   
a reply to: annonentity

Rants from anti-vaxers are not proof.

What you're after is facts and figures.

You won't get those on rumble or bitchute.

Just opinion pieces and hyperbole from the likes of your Angus Dalgleish who also happens to be a big UKIP supporter.

How come these people always turn out to be radical right-wing lunatics?

Do you really imagine they would have given the likes of the vaccine to kings and queens, who own more land and wield more power, than just about anyone else on the planet, if they thought it could cause cancer?

Don't you think there would be serious repercussions by now if indeed that was the case?
edit on 6-2-2024 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 6 2024 @ 04:50 AM
link   
a reply to: UpIsNowDown2

All the guy does is spread nonsense and doom porn all over the place morning noon and night.

Sorry to hear about your Mrs UpIsNowDown2.

I lost my dad a few years back now, he had lung cancer.

They got 99% of that, but about a year later developed a brain tumor.

Managed to remove it, but the NHS sent him home less than 72 hours after the operation, was not well.

He developed pneumonia and passed away after being readmitted to the hospital.
edit on 6-2-2024 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 6 2024 @ 06:36 AM
link   

edit on 2/6/2024 by yeahright because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 6 2024 @ 08:01 AM
link   
a reply to: Phantom42338

The head of Pfizer is banging on about turbo cancer, but you as an alleged cancer researcher have never heard of it? Yeah...



posted on Feb, 6 2024 @ 08:15 AM
link   
a reply to: FlyInTheOintment

I haven't seen Pfizer's CEO talking about "turbo cancer". Perhaps you can post a link?
I looked it up. It's another COVID scam.

COVID-19 Vaccines Have Not Been Shown to Cause ‘Turbo Cancer’




Turbo cancer is an anti-vaccination myth[1] centred on the idea that people vaccinated against COVID-19, especially with mRNA vaccines, are suffering from a high incidence of fast-developing cancers. The myth, spread by a number of vaccine opponents and related influencers including doctors,[2] has no factual basis.[3][1]


ZERO evidence.



posted on Feb, 6 2024 @ 08:32 AM
link   
a reply to: Oldcarpy2

I'm not a royalist, but nevertheless i hope he make a swift and full recovery. Wouldn't wish this on anyone



posted on Feb, 6 2024 @ 08:57 AM
link   
Shame that the thread has been hijacked by anti vaccine crud.

Guess it was inevitable but please stop the bs.



new topics

top topics



 
15
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join