It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: WeMustCare
a reply to: Waterglass
Didn't the House vote to make Tlaib the equivalent of an enemy combatant 2 weeks ago?
originally posted by: MoreCoyoteAngels
a reply to: dothedew
She is doing her job representing her constituents that sent her there.
And their's is the only opinion that matters.
The question we should be asking is, how did so many people that support her get collected together into a local power base to send her?
originally posted by: WeMustCare
a reply to: Waterglass
Didn't the House vote to make Tlaib the equivalent of an enemy combatant 2 weeks ago?
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: WeMustCare
a reply to: Waterglass
Didn't the House vote to make Tlaib the equivalent of an enemy combatant 2 weeks ago?
It's called a censure which is a formal warning, not to be confused with something like indictment.
originally posted by: RazorV66
originally posted by: WeMustCare
a reply to: Waterglass
Didn't the House vote to make Tlaib the equivalent of an enemy combatant 2 weeks ago?
Apparently it didn’t work.
That’s a shame.
originally posted by: Ohanka
Not to defend Tlaib, but this is very flimsy. She joined some Facebook group years ago, and last posted in it in 2018 as part of usual social media election campaigning. Then, recently, a few members of the group wrote posts favouring Hamas.
Is there any indication she has paid any attention to this Facebook group in the last 5 years, let alone expressed agreement with the pro-Hamas posters? It goes without saying that mere group membership is not agreement.
Fox is well known for making something out of nothing. Much like the rest of the MSM.