It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
AI is in a way “stealing” from other works to create new works. From what I’ve heard (but don’t quote me)
AI art can’t be copyrighted.
although I can't see myself in a mirror but this is how I see myself
originally posted by: JAGStorm
a reply to: ChaoticOrder
From an artist standpoint, we are in uncharted territory.
AI is in a way “stealing” from other works to create new works. From what I’ve heard (but don’t quote me)
AI art can’t be copyrighted.
originally posted by: 0bserver1
a reply to: ArMaP
But that's it , it's not considered a tool anymore by science and if science keeps warning us about the conscience sentience of this tool can we still consider it a tool ?
And to me that's both thinking in plain text as of thinking images of itself
To be fair, if it was using Dall E to generate the images, then it's really two separate AI's, and not how GPT-4 really imagines itself. Image generation AI's like Dall E typically require a text prompt which they use to generate the image. GPT-4 probably generated a prompt such as "A powerful AI being overlooking and guiding human society" and Dall E generated that image.
If you put a blind man and a deaf woman in a dark room and you suddenly turn on a bright red light together with a loud alarm the deaf woman will ask the blind man what he heard while the blind man will ask the deaf woman what she saw