Burisma honcho said he was coerced to pay Hunter and Joe Biden

"A bombshell FBI informant file containing a $10 million bribery allegation against President Biden and his son was released Thursday by Sen. Chuck Grassley, showing that a Ukrainian oligarch claimed he was “coerced” into making the payoff.

The owner of Ukrainian gas company Burisma Holdings, Mykola Zlochevsky, told the FBI informant in 2016 during a meeting at a coffee shop in Vienna, Austria, that “it cost 5 [million] to pay one Biden, and 5 [million] to another Biden,” according to the redacted FD-1023 form.

“Zlochevsky made some comment that although Hunter Biden ‘was stupid, and his (Zlochevsky’s) dog was smarter,’ Zlochevsky needed to keep Hunter Biden (on Burisma’s board) ‘so everything will be okay,'” the document says.

According to the report, the source then inquired whether Hunter Biden or Joe Biden told Zlochevsky he should “retain” the younger Biden; Zlochevsky replied, “They both did.”


The walls are closing in!

nypost.com...

a reply to: CoyoteAngels

Zlochevsky says his dog was smarter than Hunter, but is he speaking in terms of pure intellectual capacity?

youtu.be...

a reply to: ColeYounger

My dog would know better than to leave any incriminating frisbees laying around when she was up to no good.... not like some hoomans named Hunter...

No he didn't. A secondhand source claims he said that.

Zlovchevsky says the whole thing is made up.

Source

originally posted by: Threadbare
No he didn't. A secondhand source claims he said that.

Zlovchevsky says the whole thing is made up.

Source

What do you expect him to say?
"Yes, I bribed them."

Leftists: where is the evidence?!

*presents evidence*

Leftists: iTs fAke rEeEEeEeeE

Y’all continue to be a source of amusement but this # ain’t funny anymore!

IMPEACH NOW

a reply to: Threadbare

The news in the NYPost is today. Yours is from an month ago. This is an update to the story.

A file containing documents that allege this were released today.

a reply to: CoyoteAngels

It's the same file that Congress members were discussing weeks ago. It's the same document that Raskin refuted by bringing up the transcript of Zlochevsky.

a reply to: PurpleFox

It rich that you guys are talking about ignoring evidence.

By the way, the provenance of this "evidence" is on the same level as the Steele Dossier.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: PurpleFox

It rich that you guys are talking about ignoring evidence.

By the way, the provenance of this "evidence" is on the same level as the Steele Dossier.

So you agree that there should be a Special Council investigation?


AAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: PurpleFox

It rich that you guys are talking about ignoring evidence.

By the way, the provenance of this "evidence" is on the same level as the Steele Dossier.

And we all know how the Steele Dossier was good enough engage a 2 year investigation and wall to wall news coverage.

Why is this receiving a different outcome?

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: PurpleFox

It rich that you guys are talking about ignoring evidence.

By the way, the provenance of this "evidence" is on the same level as the Steele Dossier.

The Steele Dossier?
You mean the one that still gets pushed by certain people here and everywhere else?

And now might be a good time to link to Lev Parnas' letter to Comer. If you remember, Lev was the boots on the ground for Rudy and Trump in Ukraine. Tasked with finding the "dirt". Comer refuses to call him in to testify, which is weird because Lev kept all of his text messages and emails. Although maybe not weird, because if you read what actually happened, they were unable to actually find any dirt. Zlochevsky, never made such a claim. Giuliani and Trump were pushing extremely hard on these people, as noted in link below. Lev also discusses how the laptop was actually copied by Russian agents when they got Hunter overly intoxicated, but before Rudy got it here into the hands of Bannon who manipulated the online version, it was embarrassing but had no proof of malfeasance on it.

Why won't the committee call on the one guy who's job it was to get the dirt to come in and testify with all his documentation. Strange, no?

Letter to Comer on search in Ukraine for dirt on Hunter.

a reply to: frogs453

So you would prefer to use a political investigator over the words and actions of the accused.

We have the words of the bidens et al and a money trail.

Thanks though.

a reply to: JinMI

Huh? We're to take the word of a person who "heard" something? Take the word of paid "whistleblowers"? Take the word of the Chinese illegal arms dealing spy on the run recently touted by the GOP "whistleblower", yet Trump's own people that he specifically sent to find the dirt, who has actual texts, emails etc of his year long investigation is not someone they should hear from? That's funny. So this really is about accusations then and not really about anything that actually occurred, because the man Trump hired for this very reason should be one of the first people you bring forth.

a reply to: frogs453

Huh? We're to take the word of a person who "heard" something? Take the word of paid "whistleblowers"?

you set the standard not us .... Don't you understand that ?

When the sycophantic slobbering little Democrat Congress Impeached a sitting President Donald J Trump on the word of Paid whistleblowers who " Heard some stuff " . The standard price was set .

Indicting High ranking Government Officials used to be a huge deal requiring massive Evidence , Facts and Witness testimony.

Not anymore and yet you cry about it , Cry me a river welcome to the bed you made now sleep in it.

a reply to: frogs453

You don't recognize the flushing tactics?

Oh, I now why, see if it were Trump, all those people would have pending charges.

Whats funny, well sad actually, is how you're excusing blatant corruption by a VP and now POTUS and his family.


If only any of the Bidens were held to the same legal scrutiny of Trump.

If only any of the Bidens were held to the same standard as Trump.


..since you wanted to of course bring your TDS into the thread.

a reply to: JinMI

It is a Trump person you're somehow uninterested in hearing from. You can try to spin this on me however you want, however this was the person who was involved in the original investigation started by President Trump. Your opinion doesn't change that fact. That there is pushback against him, Guiliani, Solomon, Nunes and Perry, who were all involved in this investigation that went on for a year testifying is very telling. Why wouldn't you want them to testify? Right? The original investigators can bring their receipts and nail Biden. That's a good thing right? I mean I'm sure they found all the good stuff.

This actually implicates Barr because he didn't follow through.

I guess establishment gotta establishment.

originally posted by: CoyoteAngels
"A bombshell FBI informant file containing a $10 million bribery allegation against President Biden and his son was released Thursday by Sen. Chuck Grassley, showing that a Ukrainian oligarch claimed he was “coerced” into making the payoff.

The owner of Ukrainian gas company Burisma Holdings, Mykola Zlochevsky, told the FBI informant in 2016 during a meeting at a coffee shop in Vienna, Austria, that “it cost 5 [million] to pay one Biden, and 5 [million] to another Biden,” according to the redacted FD-1023 form.

“Zlochevsky made some comment that although Hunter Biden ‘was stupid, and his (Zlochevsky’s) dog was smarter,’ Zlochevsky needed to keep Hunter Biden (on Burisma’s board) ‘so everything will be okay,'” the document says.



According to the report, the source then inquired whether Hunter Biden or Joe Biden told Zlochevsky he should “retain” the younger Biden; Zlochevsky replied, “They both did.”


The walls are closing in!

nypost.com...

Thanks for the info.