The Robert K. Hur Special Counsel Criminal Investigation of President Joseph R. Biden.

a reply to: Threadbare

Which is public knowledge.

Which then he went on to plead the 5th.

Again:

Specifically, in exchange for Combetta providing truthful information
during FBI interviews as well as truthful testimony during any grand jury or court
appearances

Combetta was interviewed subject to the terms of the immunity agreement
on May 3, 2016, by the same two FBI case agents, this time in the presence of the
SSA, the CART examiner, all four line prosecutors, and Combetta’s attorneys.
According to the FD-302 and contemporaneous notes of the two agents and the
CART Examiner, Combetta provided the FBI additional detail regarding his removal
of emails from the culling laptops, stating that Mills had requested that he “securely
delete the .pst files” in November or December 2014 but had not specifically
requested that he use “deletion software.” He told the FBI that he was the one who
recommended the use of “BleachBit” because he had used it for other clients. He
also acknowledged removing the HRC Archive mailbox from the PRN server
between March 25, 2015, and March 31, 2015, and using BleachBit to “shred” any
remaining copies of Clinton’s email on the server, despite his awareness of
Congress’s preservation order and his understanding that the order meant that “he
should not disturb Clinton’s email data on the PRN server.” According to the FD302 and contemporaneous notes, Combetta told the FBI that he had an “oh #”
moment upon realizing that he had failed to comply with Mills’s request in late 2014
or early 2015 to “change the retention policy for Clinton’s and Abedin’s existing and
ongoing mail to 60 days.” He further told the FBI that Mills had contacted him on
or about March 8, 2015, to assess what was still on the servers, including whether
there were any “old back up data or copies of mailboxes hanging out there on old
equipment.” However, he stated that he did not tell Mills that he subsequently
realized the archived emails were still on the PRN server or that he deleted them in
late March. In addition, he stated that he “could not recall the content” of the
March 25, 2015, call with Kendall and Mills. In sum, Combetta took responsibility
for the deletions, without implicating Clinton or her attorneys.

Why was Mills granted immunity as well?

Why wasn't that attorney-client privilege pierced again?

a reply to: JinMI

Nothing in there says anything about him pleading the 5th after being granted immunity.

a reply to: JinMI

Re: Mills

You can also imagine given that you’re experienced people the
challenge in trying to get a lawyer to give you their laptop that you
use for all of their legal work. Huge concerns there about attorney-
client privilege, attorney work product. We had a few options there.
One was to serve them with a Grand Jury subpoena and then litigate
the work product protection and the attorney-client protections for
probably the next five years, or reach some agreement with them to
voluntarily produce it and give them some sort of assurance as to how
the information will be used on that laptop.... Department of Justice
reached an agreement at the request of the lawyer for these two
lawyers that for act of production of immunity is the way I understand
it in my career that is you give this laptop, we will not use anything on
the laptop against you personally in a prosecution for mishandling of
classified information or anything else related to classified information.
Reasonable to ask for a lawyer to ask to give us the laptops and
enabled us to short circuit the months and months of litigation that
would've come otherwise. I was actually surprised they agree[d] to
give us the laptops.

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: JinMI

Nothing in there says anything about him pleading the 5th after being granted immunity.

Ok, a third time then:

Specifically, in exchange for Combetta providing truthful information
during FBI interviews as well as truthful testimony during any grand jury or court
appearances

So where are Trumps teams immunity deals that reach far past "limited immunity?"

Can you really not see the double standards and stretching, dare I say covering, of legal precedent and protocol?

7.27.2023

Now that its clear the DOJ and Hunter Biden's lawyers CONSPIRED with each other to PROTECT HUNTER BIDEN....

The core issue centers around what appears to be clear coordination between the USAO, likely with the approvals of Main Justice (Monaco, Garland) and the Biden defense team, to structure the wording and placement of legal mechanisms inside the plea agreement to not only excuse the current criminal infractions, but also protect Hunter Biden from future criminal liability.

Source: theconservativetreehouse.com...

Is there any doubt Special Counsel Robert Hur was installed merely to ultimately give Joe Biden the "All Clear", regardless of how many classified documents he stole, or what he did with them to earn $$$???

July 28, 2023

Judiciary Chairman James Jordan requested information about the "Scope" of the Special Counsel investigation of Joe Biden's theft of numerous classified documents.

Way back on June 7th: judiciary.house.gov...

I can't find where he did or did not receive a response. In fact, Mr. Jordan hasn't said a peep about S.C. Robert Hur's investigation of Biden's multiple thefts.

Bad sign...No?

a reply to: carewemust

8.10.2023

Attorney General Merrick Garland has assigned a special counsel to protect the Biden family from being exposed as traitors, because Joe Biden stole classified US National Security documents for years, and sold information contained in them to foreign nations.

Look up the name Robert Hur, special counsel.

This story dwarfs all other crimes committed by the Bidens.

Yet no one is talking about it in conservative circles. Not even social media.

Why is that?

Sounds like Hur's investigation may be wrapping up. Biden's lawyers have been negotiating with the special counsel over the terms under which he will be interviewed.

Interviewing Biden is most likely the last thing Hur needs to do.

a reply to: Threadbare

Negotiating for a month.

nypost.com...

What does that tell you?

The resistance tells me plenty.

a reply to: carewemust

Does that reasoning also apply to Trump running out the clock on answering questions from the J6 Committee?

a reply to: Threadbare

There's no comparison between a special counsel wanting to talk to you and Congress wanting to talk to you.

Below is what I'm pasting on every board I can find today....

President Joe Biden has been resisting this interview by special counsel prosecutor Robert Hur for a month.

WHY?

Because for at least 12 years, he illegally removed highly classified documents from their secure areas.

Kept many of them in his GARAGE.

And likely sold the contents for Biden crime family income, as emails on Hunter Biden's laptop indicate.
#bidencrimefamily

nypost.com...

Also, it was just announced by Merrick Garland, that Hunter Biden is now under investigation by a special prosecutor.

a reply to: carewemust

Did you see who it is? I mean, you could not write a worse Netflix script with this....

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: carewemust

Did you see who it is? I mean, you could not write a worse Netflix script with this....

Well, he could have appointed Kamala.

a reply to: matafuchs

The prosecutor that's been working this case for three years, that was appointed by Trump, and has had the GOP clamoring to have him appointed as special counsel for a while now?

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Threadbare

Negotiating for a month.

nypost.com...

What does that tell you?

The resistance tells me plenty.

this is why president so timid and afraid

originally posted by: WingDingLuey

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Threadbare

Negotiating for a month.

nypost.com...

What does that tell you?

The resistance tells me plenty.

this is why president so timid and afraid

Yes, even more so than usual. Did you see how he froze up three times while making a speech yesterday?

The media was supposed to cover it. But thank God they got some climate change fires in Maui to distract from having to cover their president.

a reply to: Threadbare

The GOP wanted a special counsel appointed from outside of government.

Weiss has lost stature, by agreeing to the crazy Hunter Biden plea deal.

Imo, they should start with an impeachment inquiry of Garland and Wray.

Particularly Wray, who has been covering for the Bidens and overseeing harassment of Trump for 6 years.

a reply to: carewemust

Graham, Senate Republicans Call for Hunter Biden Prosecutor to be Given Special Counsel Authority

originally posted by: Threadbare
a reply to: carewemust

Graham, Senate Republicans Call for Hunter Biden Prosecutor to be Given Special Counsel Authority

so how many didn't?

how many think a doj person is illegal selection?