Photo of a "Black Triangle"

Originally posted by Simulacra
Any photochop experts care to comment on the validity of the pic? From where im sitting, it looks absolutely real to me.

T.V. show? Movie?

As far as I can tell, all the proportions are correct and the distances are accurate and don't appear to be faked.

Also notice the lights "behind" the tree branches this says that the camera IS looking at a real object. This can't be a plane that we have unless there is something out there we don't know about, government. It appears to be stationary or moving very slowly, too slow for aerodynamic flight. So it appears to be defying gravity...

Also the lights appear to be organised to focus on examining the surface. Like the searchlight on a helicopter. Light for anti-collision travel would be facing away from the craft outward so other aircraft would be able to see it oncoming. Also you don't need to emit light to show gravity, this is an invisible force. So this rules out the lights being some form of propulsion. They are definately for examination purposes...

2 things comes to mind though. The photo is too perfect almost like it was staged.

Next why is there a black circular halo around the outer parts of the image. A camera or video camera wouldn't look like binoculars or a telescope lens.

My only explanation for the black fade out, could be that the lights coming form the craft are so bright that it illuminates the craft to the camera while the surrounding area is dark.

Interesting photo. Real or not.

No, it's a fake, as I just proved. The blue light stretching out on both sides of the middle light of the craft, it's an 'eye' effect and thusly would stay Above everything else on the photograph, but the bad photoshopper didn't know this and just edited it in behind all the trees. Also, why is it blue if the center light is white?

Can anyone on here try and reproduce this photo on photoshop?

This would give us some idea hoe easily this could have been faked.

i have just started reading this thread so i have quite a way to go to catch up,but here are my views.
the 3 points of the triangle could not have pointed ends ,think about it,if a craft were to fly fast, the tips would get hot (not saying that new material unknown may not get hot) ,having curved ends would allow for the air to move around the wing, also if this is alien it would be made with excellent technology either perfect or symetrical. We like to believe in ufo,s but while there are bogus ones,the ones we wish to believe are genuine, must appear to be so.

What's questionable about this picture ?
For starters the "night time" quality of the video or photo is unprecidented. Anyone who has ever seen night photos of bright lights can attest the surrounding sky is generaly dark or pitch black with orbs of light blurring from movement. Most CCD cameras do a bad compensation of bright lights against dark backgrounds.

This photo illustrates many bright lumunous lights in a night time setting. The photo shows perfect light luminosity without burn in. The compensation of bright lights without causing burn while simultaneously capturing the ambient light in a night time setting would require professional settings. That or multiple shots at different settings to get it right. In short this is not a shot you would see with camera set to default.

This shot can be accomplished in CG without issue as I have already proved in previous image posts.



[edit on 21-11-2005 by nullster]

Originally posted by Netchicken
Now lets consider the KISS principle (Keep it simple stupid).

1. We have large black triangles cruising the land at night scaring people. (Personally I believe this is true, they are real there is enough evidence of that, and this pic is probably real as well)

So where might they come from?

A: Secret US technology
B: Secret Foreign technology
C: Aliens from beetlejuice

OK Looking at it logically and simply, which of the 3 above is the best bet. Remember I don't care what you see on TV, or have assimilated from science fiction books

Keep it simple

- just how realistic is it that the makers of these craft come from another planet light years away.

Or is it more realistic to believe that they are manufactured here by humans?

We are so saturated in a science fiction society through TV, books, movies, etc that the implausability of the entire situation is lost in a niave agreement that aliens can fly lightyears to visit earth and scare us.

i agree with a lot of what you say,lets look to the obvious but there is one thing you have missed out in regards to flying ,the nearest star is 4 and a half light years away,which means you would have to fly at 186,000 miles per second or 11160000 miles a minute,and at that speed it will take you,186,000x 60x60x24x365x4.5 years,if our rockets were to fly at say 20,000 miles an hour that would only give you 5 and a half mile a second,my figures (they could be wrong ) will take you 37200 years to get there.
Now there are 2 more solutions,one is there are gateways in space being discussed at the moment that its possible to get from A to B not in a straight line,do a search for youself (i,m not sure if its quantum physics).
the other solution,go back into history and there is talk about a planet NIBURU as discussed by the Mayans, apparently this is a planet that goes in an eliptical plane orbiting every 3600 years which has been spotted 2 months ago and should be near here in about 7 years time.
Lets suppose the orbit is 3600 ,thats around 1800 years in one direction and 1800 years to return ,stretch an elastic band in your fore fingers,think about the orbit,imagine the earth being roughly in the middle of the elastic band that means 1800 years ago the planet was near the earth and 1800 years before that it would have been in the same place to earth BUT on the other side of the orbit,history tells us that Christ was on the earth 2000 years ago (just move the position of the earth in the elastic band slightly) and before that in the old testament there were other visits .it is possible that this planet is where these ufo,s are coming from,just an opinion but maybe possible.
i would like your views,i believe the info is correct,if i am wrong please put me right.

also don,t forget the earth spins on its own axis at 24,000 miles a day and it takes 365 days to orbit the sun,maybe someone here can say how many 00000, of miles the earth travels,its NOT 24,000x365 cause its spinning on its own axis, but we do know the sun is 93 million miles away so if there are any educated people here can work out pi,let us know.

Originally posted by stmichael
also don,t forget the earth spins on its own axis at 24,000 miles a day and it takes 365 days to orbit the sun,maybe someone here can say how many 00000, of miles the earth travels,its NOT 24,000x365 cause its spinning on its own axis, but we do know the sun is 93 million miles away so if there are any educated people here can work out pi,let us know.

Works out to be about 66,705.049 M/P/H.

Also we would never travel so slow with the intent to reach another system.

You could use a Nuclear Rocket to accelerate half way to the destination, and then decelerate the other half of the way. You would get there much faster that way.

After about a half of a year accelerating at one G-Force you would be travelling approx. half the speed of light. A Nuclear Powered Reactor could run for 20 years without problems or refueling.

[edit on 21-11-2005 by lost_shaman]

"After about a half of a year accelerating at one G-Force you would be travelling approx. half the speed of light. A Nuclear Powered Reactor could run for 20 years without problems or refueling."

Thanks for that info. It caused me to find this:

According to this, 20 years of running 1-g would make it to the Hyades and back.

one-g spacecraft:

Given such acceleration, it would be possible to reach the Orion Nebula (about 1,000 light-years away) in 30 years of shipboard time. As the 1g spacecraft drew closer and closer to the speed of light, relativistic effects such as time dilation would become increasingly apparent. Time would pass more slowly on the ship in comparison with time on Earth. For example, after a round-trip journey at 1g acceleration and deceleration lasting 10 years as measured by the crew, 24 years would have elapsed back home. Relativistic effects would also ensure that, as measured by stationary observers, a spacecraft could not continue to build speed at 1g, or 9.8 m/s², indefinitely. If it did, in just under one year it would break the light-barrier. According to the special theory of relativity no object can be accelerated to the speed of light. Instead, as light-speed were approached, the relationship between space and time would alter in the spacecraft’s frame of reference so that although the crew would continue to feel and register on their instruments a 1g acceleration, stationary observers would see the spacecraft simply drawing ever nearer — but never quite reaching — the ultimate speed limit of light. The table shows some of the dramatic possibilities for lengthy excursions in a 1g spacecraft. These figures assume equal periods of acceleration and deceleration at 1g on both the outgoing and return legs of the journey.


Round-trip Times Assuming an Acceleration of 1g

Time as measured
on board ship (yr).....Time on Earth (yr)........Max Range(light-yrs.).......AttainableTarget

1............................1..............................0.059...........................Oort Cloud
10..........................24.............................9.8..............................Sirius
20..........................270...........................137..............................Hyades
30..........................3,100.........................1,565...........................Orion Nebula
40..........................36,000.......................17,600..........................Globular cluster
50..........................420,000.....................209,000.........................Magellanic Clouds
60..........................5,000,000...................2,480,000......................Andromeda Galaxy


Source: www.daviddarling.info...

So what about the theory i gave 2 posts back, about NIBURU,being here 1800 years ago and the connection with visitations around those times?

"...a planet that goes in an eliptical plane orbiting every 3600 years..."

"...stretch an elastic band in your fore fingers,think about the orbit,imagine the earth being roughly in the middle of the elastic band that means 1800 years ago..."

The Earth would not be in the middle of the elastic band, it would be at one end.
The center point of one of your fingers would represent the sun and possibly
your skin surrounding your finger would represent the Earth's orbit. To have the elastic band represent an elliptical orbit of a planet with a period of 3600 years,
you would have to stretch it about ten feet.

A good graphic explination of elliptical orbits can be found here:

www.astro-tom.com...

HTH, Theox

Originally posted by Theox
"...a planet that goes in an eliptical plane orbiting every 3600 years..."

"...stretch an elastic band in your fore fingers,think about the orbit,imagine the earth being roughly in the middle of the elastic band that means 1800 years ago..."

The Earth would not be in the middle of the elastic band, it would be at one end.
The center point of one of your fingers would represent the sun and possibly
your skin surrounding your finger would represent the Earth's orbit. To have the elastic band represent an elliptical orbit of a planet with a period of 3600 years,
you would have to stretch it about ten feet.

A good graphic explination of elliptical orbits can be found here:

www.astro-tom.com...

HTH, Theox

thanks theox for your reply,you obviously know a lot more than i,maybe i am wrong but what i was getting at,i will try to explain alittle better imagine a line with the planets on the same level plane ie, and N represents niburu , E earth, with the orbit towards earth ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,, N








---o--o--o--o--Eo-Vo-----Mo-----------------suno-------------------o-----
maybe i got it wrong ,just trying to explain the return of planet X that was sighted a couple of months ago,if you have more info,tell us what you think,mike

[edit on 21-11-2005 by stmichael]

[edit on 21-11-2005 by stmichael]

[edit on 21-11-2005 by stmichael]

[edit on 21-11-2005 by stmichael]

Originally posted by UnMature

external image

Anyone else notice what looks almost like a small person (small in comparison to the craft) standing to the left of where the forward light reaches the ground? This is not something on the brances but rather something on the ground beneath the craft...any ideas as to what it is?

I am with you, If you look the center-down area u can see somebody.
Correct if I am wrong, but this pic isnt from ET film from Spielberg? I have almost sure that I saw this pic in a film.

[edit on 27/11/05 by lnxsys]

[edit on 12/14/2005 by Amorymeltzer]

Everyone thinks that the edges of this craft are bent. However I think that it is a perfect triangle.
The distortion you see is a result of the superconducting plasma ring inside which bends space-time.
This is a photo of a top secret US craft that uses reverse engineered UFO technology.

It proves that the propulsion method is some advanced anti-gravity system as you can see the gravitational distortion caused by the drive.
It is very real.
Great photo.

Originally posted by lnxsys
I am with you, If you look the center-down area u can see somebody.
Correct if I am wrong, but this pic isnt from ET film from Spielberg? I have almost sure that I saw this pic in a film.

I think to have seen it as well, but thought it was from an x-files episode or something? I think people need to look in that direction...

yuchtar.users4.50megs.com...

[edit on 28-11-2005 by Simon666]

The guy made it - click on the photo and he tells you how..

www.aptt79.dsl.pipex.com...

Hate to say I told you so (check second post on this page), but there you have it.. you're all stupid.

I finally got a hold of JDP82, the guy from Sweden who saw 12 or so UFOs flying low above his house. He presented me with the two, I'm sorry to agree, crappy pics he took with his cell phone cam (I think it was).







mod edit: reduced image size to restore page format.

[edit on 29-12-2005 by sanctum]

Sorry for not responding earlier, I kinda forgot about ATS. It won't happen again. Yepp, those are the pics that I took with my crappy digital cam. It's a shame you can't see the shap of the craft. Accually the "craft" is more further away than it looks. You can clearly see three roadlights going from left to right by the road. The crafts did not have the usual big lights at the edges, but instead they where equiped with alot of small lights underneath. There where no blinking lights but steady lights pointing to the ground.

interesting to me..interesting to you?