Ukraine Was Building a Dirty Bomb?

I think in the context used by the MSM and interweb doom porn mongers, dirty bombs are right up there with Red Mercury, Suitcase Nukes and mutant Unicorns with laser beam eyes!

Scary stories for the masses to have them clamouring for their governments to "do something" and protest them!

a reply to: argentus

What I am seeing is the IAEA director stated there is 30,000 kilos of Plutonium and 40,000 kilos of enrinched Uranium held at the Zaporizhzhya, and that since they can't get in there they has concerns some may go missing.

Then the Ukranian official hastily responded by saying they have no undeclared waste. The dispute seems to come from his saying the IAEA is falling for Russian propaganda.

The journalist was just saying the IAEA director was concerned some could go missing without assigning blame.

I don't know what the inspecorate read that made him react in the manner he did.

Beyond that the J.P. Farrell fellow was piggingbacking off the concerns and the potentiality for those waste resources.

I don't think the claim was ever that the IAEA mentioned dirty bombs, just their concerns of how the waste could go missing. They are not able to get to the site to verify anything which is where his concern comes from.

I'm not familiar with a lot of the sources or counter sources, but it does seem some sort of dispute did take place. It may have been the Inspectorate fell for and reacted to Russian propaganda which caused the dispute.

a reply to: Britguy

That's very interesting; thank you for the info.

originally posted by: Britguy
I think in the context used by the MSM and interweb doom porn mongers, dirty bombs are right up there with Red Mercury, Suitcase Nukes and mutant Unicorns with laser beam eyes!

Scary stories for the masses to have them clamouring for their governments to "do something" and protest them!

The even deeper rumours are that the supposed Nazi Bell used red mercury as part of it's propulsion/levitation!

tabloid

That’s downright rotten.

At least it wasn’t a cobolt bomb ....

a reply to: chris_stibrany

a reply to: Britguy




the projectile on this recoiless rifile is a nuke

take the aerodynamic shell off and how big do you think that nuke is?

it would easily fit in a back pack.

here is an atomic demolition unit.

the majority of the package is padding and some of the arming devices



very small nukes that could fit in a backpack