It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Allaroundyou
a reply to: LoneCloudHopper2
So I don't live In Canada so I am asking this first part in all seriousness.
The second part is me taking a jab because I can.
So was that peaceful protest which I agree was actually protected when roads have been blocked by force for day?
Now you can have at it with this.
It certainly seems like others right to travel freely and go about daily life was definitely impacted. How can someone call the free and protected while actually restricting other?
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: LoneCloudHopper2
So are these truckers protesting against seatbelt mandates?
originally posted by: NorthOfStuff
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: LoneCloudHopper2
So are these truckers protesting against seatbelt mandates?
This overreach did not start in a vacuum. Don’t think for a minute that seatbelt laws were were brought in for safety.
They were brought in on the premise of protecting a social program call health care. Socialism breeds overreach.
It was still overreach and just because people didn’t stand up to it then in no way means they shouldn’t start sometime.
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: Allaroundyou
Over the decades there have been numerous peaceful protesters by liberals that spilled over into the streets. Some deliberately changed themselves together with their arms bound in metal cylinders to make it hard to pull them apart. They blocked traffic as well. During all of those the conservative community came down staunchly against the protesters using the very same argument you bring up in your post. Police action was expected as well as going to jail. No one was shocked when it happened.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: NorthOfStuff
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: LoneCloudHopper2
So are these truckers protesting against seatbelt mandates?
This overreach did not start in a vacuum. Don’t think for a minute that seatbelt laws were were brought in for safety.
They were brought in on the premise of protecting a social program call health care. Socialism breeds overreach.
It was still overreach and just because people didn’t stand up to it then in no way means they shouldn’t start sometime.
Those b'tards, trapping us all forever in their seatbelts!
We should start printing fake 'seatbelt passports' and peacefully causing accidents to show them how having seatbelts is killing us by the billions.
We should jump from airplanes, too, to protest being locked up in a pressurized fuselage. Who even invented that word? They clearly must have changed the meaning, just because someone wanted to force everyone to fly long distances in aircraft rather than walk overseas, as nature intended. It's a conspiracy run by 'big air'. Jump for freedum.
... think of the children. It's about time we put children before large trucks!
originally posted by: NorthOfStuff
a reply to: chr0naut
LOL, ya I know.
I think what woke people up is the fact that you can unstrap a seatbelt when away from your car but you can’t suck out a vax when you’re not around the infested.
Too bad it took this to give people a shake.
originally posted by: igloo
originally posted by: NorthOfStuff
a reply to: chr0naut
LOL, ya I know.
I think what woke people up is the fact that you can unstrap a seatbelt when away from your car but you can’t suck out a vax when you’re not around the infested.
Too bad it took this to give people a shake.
And they don't take your job away for not wearing a seatbelt.