Huge WikiLeaks info dump

a reply to: REDMORGAN

Yes, they did in retaliation to what is been done to Assange, I was a big worry about posting with the link to wikileaks, as we know is very controvertial.

But darn the information is ugly, very ugly,

a reply to: Lux96

And all your friends and family, rejoice at 'finding and saving' you, and you have to pretend you good and you love everyone.

a reply to: Lux96

Satanic cultist, don't judge what you don't know. Illuminati are just higher up captured sunbros.
They wanted to spread light, now they use em to burn the earth.

A U.K. court permits Assange extradition to the U.S. on spying charges
December 10, 20216:38 AM ET
www.npr.org...

a reply to: REDMORGAN

It does not matter who dumps what anymore. We have something which cant be ignored and will need our full attention. You just have to decide what side of history you're on. When the light starts flashing red.

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: REDMORGAN

It does not matter who dumps what anymore. We have something which cant be ignored and will need our full attention. You just have to decide what side of history you're on. When the light starts flashing red.

Yup none of this matters anymore more, that ship has sailed, now comes the complete breakdown of society part, which happens because the ruling class were reckless and justice not served

Rome is about to fall, nobody wins, civilisation just goes in reverse for a few hundred years

Maybe we could have some debates on important issues from the files, I mean it is some good stuff in there, but is soo many of them.

a reply to: REDMORGAN

We got Podesta brothers. We got Hillarys e-mails. We got Bilderberg. We got satanic rituals in high places, aliens, wars, and conspiracies of every sort

I pray this is real!

a reply to: Lux96

To be honest alot of concerning stuff in wikileaks. It's weird how people just pretend it's cool and theyre trying to safe the world.

Everyone has agendas, whether they're known or a mystery.

But I don't need to be "protected" from agendas. I'll make that decision for myself. I'll take more information than less any day of the week.

List most major ideologies, and I've heard them out, listened to their pundits, and talked to people online who aren't shilling it for clout or money.

That's part of living in an open and free society with mostly free speech. Part of the tradeoff is having to filter through the muck.

I'm sure there's some motives or ideology behind the scenes at wikileaks I wouldn't agree with... But at the end of the day their accuracy is higher than almost any other outlet because they just pass along vetted information with little to no interjected opinion.

Whether or not you agree with them, the issue at hand of legal action isn't isolated to wikileaks only, but journalism as a whole. Protect the rights of those you disagree with or forfeit your own.