Supreme Court Declines to Block Vaccine Mandates for Healthworkers (in Maine)

dailycaller.com...

As the Court falls in line with the Biden agenda, it is clear it is just as political as ever, advancing an agenda that utterly ignores individual autonomy.

originally posted by: Salander
dailycaller.com...

As the Court falls in line with the Biden agenda, it is clear it is just as political as ever, advancing an agenda that utterly ignores individual autonomy.

Well if they cant follow the COTUS it is time we removed the lot of them and start over with new citizens elected to their positions and new agency's to replace the failing FBI and Judicial appointees will have to be vetted to follow the COTUS. They have left the box to go out on their own.

Not to forget...all these mandates are still forcing THE EXPERIMENTAL version of the "Vaccines" (with no liability to anyone), because there is no "approved" vaccine that is available.

If I am reading this correctly, it was not a SCOTUS decision - simply that Justice Breyer blocked the case from being heard by the SC.
Is that correct?

originally posted by: UKTruth
If I am reading this correctly, it was not a SCOTUS decision - simply that Justice Breyer blocked the case from being heard by the SC.
Is that correct?

Thats the way it reads

The article stated that the Supreme Court has not weighed in on Bidens Federal mandate.

This request was made against a state mandate.

originally posted by: MALBOSIA

originally posted by: UKTruth
If I am reading this correctly, it was not a SCOTUS decision - simply that Justice Breyer blocked the case from being heard by the SC.
Is that correct?

Thats the way it reads

The article stated that the Supreme Court has not weighed in on Bidens Federal mandate.

This request was made against a state mandate.

Yes, and I read it that it was just Breyer decision to decline to block the state mandate as it's Breyer alone who makes those kind of determinations (with responsibility for such emergency motions from Maine)

a reply to: MALBOSIA

Sadly, only the liberal Justices are taking on these local cases, and (of course) ruling in favor of what the Evil Biden administration/Democrats want to do to us and our children.

Earlier this month, Sotomayor sided with Democrats in implementing New York City's draconian measures.

Source: www.reuters.com...

Where are conservatives, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Thomas, Barrett, and Roberts?

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: MALBOSIA

Sadly, only the liberal Justices are taking on these local cases, and (of course) ruling in favor of what the Evil Biden administration/Democrats want to do to us and our children.

Earlier this month, Sotomayor sided with Democrats in implementing New York City's draconian measures.

Source: www.reuters.com...

Where are conservatives, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Thomas, Barrett, and Roberts?

My understanding is that a single Justice has responsibility for certain states.
I suspect that SCOTUS assignments are mapped to States in such a way that means these whacky Dem led states always get the decision from a liberal Justice.
Could it be that none of the States that are Republican-led have tried to implement any such measures and therefore the likes of Gorsuch, Thomas etc are not needed to make these kinds of decisions? (although it looks like ACB might have done the same thing in Indiana)
Would be interesting to see which Justices are responsible for which States.

a reply to: Salander

The vaccines and the boosters will prove useless long term and all these mandates will backfire . Hope and change is coming to the people

originally posted by: Salander
dailycaller.com...

As the Court falls in line with the Biden agenda, it is clear it is just as political as ever, advancing an agenda that utterly ignores individual autonomy.

If that’s the case, I’d like to see every one of these Justices receive the true vaccines (not saline) on live television.

Lead by example and choke on your mandates.

hi im new. been reading your forums for sometime. had to make a login to add this.
quick search "which Justices are responsible for which States"

www.supremecourt.gov...

mines this guy
For the Eighth Circuit - Brett M. Kavanaugh, Associate Justice (Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota)

weong thread

a reply to: Salander

The court didn't fall in line with anyone, a single judge denied SCOTUS the chance to hear the case "without prejudice" (meaning that it can be brought up again at a later time).

There was no official SCOTUS ruling, so you can't really claim that the court is falling in line with anything, as nothing was adjudicated.

It's only appropriate to blame the single Justice and not the entire SCOTUS. But this isn't a done deal by any means.

And trust me, I'm as anti-COVID vax mandate as can be, but it pays to be accurate and not inflammatory.

a reply to: UKTruth

Yes, I think you're right about that.

My position is that Breyer enabled harm to those not taking the shots because he refused to take the case. I do understand that procedures must be followed, and am hopeful that a lower court will remedy the situation, but at the moment Breyer's actions are not allowing the judiciary to protect individual liberty.

a reply to: SlapMonkey

You are correct on those details, and I do hope justice will be delivered by the system, but I'm not optimistic about that.

Breyer had an opportunity to comment, and the 'without prejudice' part offers a bit of hope.

Rather than any sort of comment about individual liberty, Breyer delivered just one more bureaucratic punt, a sign of the times. Maybe I'm too cynical.

Ya, I am a little perturbed with them also. They had two chances to block Texas from enforcing their abortion ban and chose not to do so. Ya, let's kick them all off the court and let Biden nominate new justices. What? You don't like that idea?

originally posted by: Salander
dailycaller.com...

As the Court falls in line with the Biden agenda, it is clear it is just as political as ever, advancing an agenda that utterly ignores individual autonomy.

Given that the court is weighed in favor of conservatives, isn't it more likely that they based their stance on legal arguments rather than party loyalty.

I can't see Trump's picks walking the Biden line unless that line is correct.

originally posted by: KKLOCO

originally posted by: Salander
dailycaller.com...

As the Court falls in line with the Biden agenda, it is clear it is just as political as ever, advancing an agenda that utterly ignores individual autonomy.

If that’s the case, I’d like to see every one of these Justices receive the true vaccines (not saline) on live television.

Lead by example and choke on your mandates.

Given how many of them are pro-vax I'd wager that they had it without a second thought.

Pro-vax people in power simply don't believe that the shot is harmful, so they get the actual shot not some substitute.

Donald Trump himself had the shot.