It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Accenture research shows that circular economy approaches, next to electrification, are an essential piece of the puzzle in efforts to align automotive mobility with a 1.5-degree scenario by reducing lifecycle carbon emissions per passenger km by up to 75% by 2030.
Realignment around common circularity language can jointly drive transformative solutions for the automotive industry.
Circular economy solutions are part of four strategic pathways: decarbonizing energy usage, establishing circular material flows, extending and optimizing product lifetime and improving capacity utilization during vehicle usage.
originally posted by: rickymouse
Well, that makes no sense at all....save the economy by giving money to the rich and big corporations.
This virus response really hurt the economy, it did not save it. It may have saved the wealth of the rich from going away but not the working class except those who benefitted by the extra unemployment, many people made more than they did when they worked.
originally posted by: Chalcedony
a reply to: lostbook
I know! Nobody gets it. These people are yes, behind closed doors fomenting plans to completely change everything about how the world works and THEY ADMIT IT ALL on their various official websites including government websites. Sometimes I feel like the female version of Alex Jones when I tell people about this. I don't care. The information is there from actual government agencies, the UN, WEF, Club of Rome. The Club of Rome published a book titled the limits of growth that lays out their entire comprehensive plan for limiting the population way back in the late 60s or early 70s and Klaus Schwab had them do a presentation in front of the newly formed WEF about this book! Schwab basically idolized Aurelio Peccei the founder of the Club of Rome. This book, the limits of growth is all about how having too many people on earth is bad because we use up all the earth's resources. People better wake up.
According to the WWF, in 1970, the then and first President of WWF International, Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, launched an initiative that was to provide WWF with a solid financial base. WWF set up a US$10 million fund, known as "The 1001: A Nature Trust". When WWF was seeking to raise the US$10 million Anton Rupert proposed to WWF Prince Bernhard the idea of finding a thousand individuals to make contributions of $10,000 each. Together with Rupert Prince Bernhard developed the concept of the 1001 Club in 1970 to help WWF cover it overheads costs.
originally posted by: rickymouse
Well, that makes no sense at all....save the economy by giving money to the rich and big corporations.
This virus response really hurt the economy, it did not save it. It may have saved the wealth of the rich from going away but not the working class except those who benefitted by the extra unemployment, many people made more than they did when they worked.