It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: ColeYounger
So there will be books available that are pro-slavery, anti-gay?
Asking for the sake of irony.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: ColeYounger
Blame Abbot and the Texas Republicans. They're the only ones that voted for HB 3979.
originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: ColeYounger
Just an FYI, there's another ongoing thread about this topic:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
originally posted by: projectvxn
So...
What's the opposing view...?
originally posted by: ColeYounger
The insanity that has become the norm in our universities has trickled down through the high schools and into our primary schools.
The school district says it's now vetting all books, and will not allow "singular perspectives that could be offensive".
Gina Peddy, the Carroll school district’s executive director of curriculum and instruction, said that if they are to have books about the Holocaust, they must also allow opposing views. OK, so what is an opposing view? Denying it happened? Justifying it? Apparently, Peddy considers the Holocaust
to somehow be "controversial" or "debateable".
Is it any wonder that large numbers of domestic terrorists, er, I mean parents, do not want their kids exposed to this lunacy?
Like a typical soulless beaurocrat, Peddy simply referred to a government mandate, saying that “Just try to remember the concepts of [House Bill] 3979,” Peddy said in the recording, referring to a new Texas law that requires teachers to present multiple perspectives when discussing “widely debated and currently controversial” issues. “And make sure that if you have a book on the Holocaust,” Peddy continued, “that you have one that has an opposing, that has other perspectives.”
Fucc that. Fight me
(1) no teacher shall be compelled by a policy of any state agency, school district, campus, open-enrollment charter school, or school administration to discuss current events or widely debated and currently controversial issues of public policy or social affairs;
(2) Teachers who choose to discuss current events or widely debated and currently controversial issues of public policy or social affairs shall, to the best of their ability, strive to explore such issues from diverse and contending perspectives without giving deference to any one perspective;