Antrim County Michigan Forensics Report Released

a reply to: DontTreadOnMe

A couple of other key facts....

Federal Election Commission rules require all margins of error to be UNDER .0008%. An error rate of 68.05% clearly puts these results in violation of federal rules guiding elections.

Also, the state is REQUIRED to keep all records, audit data, and ballots for 2 years post election. The report indicates that these files were deleted and attempt to remove. Forensics is working to recover deleted data as we speak. But I also remember seeing some "guidance" from SoS Benson to wipe all machines after the election....does anyone else remember that? If she actually gave that order, she could be charged with Obstruction of Justice and Election Tampering.

originally posted by: Middleoftheroad
Sad part is based on the evidence not even our third party is safe from Democrats corruption. The Democrats stole like 50% of their votes and a ton of Trumps.

What third party? You mean like that Green Party the D’s sued to get thrown off the PN state ballot?

And won....

Like them?

a reply to: CIAGypsy

Why not treason? I’m not sure how that crime works, but it seems like US election tampering or corruption should fall under that consequence too maybe?

I don’t even like capitol punishment. But....

“Off with her head!”

a reply to: network dude
Part of the reason for the delay was lawsuits, Sec of State interference, and attempts to postpone.
This should have been done in Wayne county, but........

a reply to: slatesteam

I’m referring to the OP’s source. I’m not familiar with what you’re talking about, but it wouldn’t surprise me.

originally posted by: slatesteam
a reply to: CIAGypsy

Why not treason? I’m not sure how that crime works, but it seems like US election tampering or corruption should fall under that consequence too maybe?

I don’t even like capitol punishment. But....

“Off with her head!”

In order to prove treason, you would have to prove:

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

I can imagine she would claim her actions were the motivation of other reasons and not to purposely levy war against the US govt or providing aid & comfort to enemies of the United States.

Joe Biden on the other hand.......lol.

a reply to: network dude

Of course, they let it leak out in dribs and drabs because it's no fun to win if you can't rub someone's face in how you got away with it.

originally posted by: DontTreadOnMe
a reply to: network dude
Part of the reason for the delay was lawsuits, Sec of State interference, and attempts to postpone.
This should have been done in Wayne county, but........

I have to admit that the MI AG's quick willingness to sign off on the redactions bothers me a bit. Of course, he tried to drag his feet until Bailey's attorney threatened to tell the world on television what he was doing. My first thought was "so what? Why would that scare them? They've been doing that type of obfuscation for years...." I know they said the redactions were "minor" and "irrelevant" but I have a hard time believing ANYTHING is minor or irrelevant in this case.

a reply to: DontTreadOnMe

Am I missing something?

Trump got more votes after the 'flip'. It's in the report.

If someone cheated...

Btw, I reached out to several Republican members of congress in both the House and Senate and asked WHY they are not doing forensics on Dominion machines in Republican states such as Florida, Tennessee, Alaska, Nebraska, Iowa, etc...which might corroborate the fraud that was seen in swing states? Powell had mentioned weeks ago that the Dominion software was likely changing votes across all states where it was used. Why are Republicans not gathering this evidence with the support of Congress personnel in those states to validate those beliefs?

a reply to: Middleoftheroad

You do realize most cases of voting fraud in recent times were carried out by Republicans?

Cries of voter fraud should be aimed at those committing it: Republicans

Cognitive dissonance aside, can you drop the BS claim that only Democrats commit fraud?

originally posted by: CIAGypsy
Btw, I reached out to several Republican members of congress in both the House and Senate and asked WHY they are not doing forensics on Dominion machines in Republican states such as Florida, Tennessee, Alaska, Nebraska, Iowa, etc...which might corroborate the fraud that was seen in swing states? Powell had mentioned weeks ago that the Dominion software was likely changing votes across all states where it was used. Why are Republicans not gathering this evidence with the support of Congress personnel in those states to validate those beliefs?

What’d they say? “It’s a Christmas Miracle?”

originally posted by: CIAGypsy
a reply to: DontTreadOnMe

A couple of other key facts....

Federal Election Commission rules require all margins of error to be UNDER .0008%. An error rate of 68.05% clearly puts these results in violation of federal rules guiding elections.

Also, the state is REQUIRED to keep all records, audit data, and ballots for 2 years post election. The report indicates that these files were deleted and attempt to remove. Forensics is working to recover deleted data as we speak. But I also remember seeing some "guidance" from SoS Benson to wipe all machines after the election....does anyone else remember that? If she actually gave that order, she could be charged with Obstruction of Justice and Election Tampering.

Tampering with evidence has never stopped the left before... From Hilary and her email debacle, to Mueller's team wiping all their cell phones, and so many more examples to list, its obvious the left doesn't care tampering/cheating blatantly.. They know even if its proven, they have big tech/legacy media and establishment politicians suppressing it

originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: Middleoftheroad

You do realize most cases of voting fraud in recent times were carried out by Republicans?

Cries of voter fraud should be aimed at those committing it: Republicans

Cognitive dissonance aside, can you drop the BS claim that only Democrats commit fraud?

Define “recent times” please? Link?

Like this election or all the others recently BESIDES this election.....

Edit: My bad. Watkins from KS is clearly the criminal mastermind behind this Dominion voting scandal and complete sham of an election due to corruption, distorting, and outright fraud. Jesus.

Do these trolls get paid by the word for this propaganda?

I need a job

I think they should forensic audit the whole shebang.

Open the can up...no matter who it is cheating.

Not surprising at all...

originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: Middleoftheroad

You do realize most cases of voting fraud in recent times were carried out by Republicans?

Cries of voter fraud should be aimed at those committing it: Republicans

Cognitive dissonance aside, can you drop the BS claim that only Democrats commit fraud?

So, knowing that, we should ignore any and all election fraud. Got it. Derp.

originally posted by: DontTreadOnMe
a reply to: network dude
Part of the reason for the delay was lawsuits, Sec of State interference, and attempts to postpone.
This should have been done in Wayne county, but........

Like I said, it's pointless. Unless the plan is to laugh at everyone who felt this wasn't totally kosher. as it stands, that seems the most likely reason.

The 2020 missing voting data and 68% error rate seal this one.

If these are indeed true, this election was tampered with.

Let’s see if anything happens.

originally posted by: wdkirk
The 2020 missing voting data and 68% error rate seal this one.

If these are indeed true, this election was tampered with.

Let’s see if anything happens.

You aren't serious are you?

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: DontTreadOnMe

Am I missing something?

Trump got more votes after the 'flip'. It's in the report.

If someone cheated...

Yes, you are. You're looking at the candidates, not the machines and methods where the actual problem occurred.