It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I doubt that, as an educated and credentialed man, I can easily see through the emotional feed you so willingly consume and how fitting considering the opinion pieces you chew and gnaw on are the result of your delusional takes and opinions of the issue.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Arnie123
Wonkette is political opinion. Their credentials are more respectable than yours. Their articles are the kinds of snark that YOU WISH our Mud Pit allowed! LOL
At any rate. Why is Trump so interested in Crowdstrike, and why does he think the "server" in in the Ukraine? Why did Durham need to interview folks in the UK and Italy? More importantly, why did Bill Barr need to tag along? Or was Burham that was tagging along? Why doesn't Barr Trust Durham?
Why does Trump keep saying that "Putin says they didn't do it"? Why is Russia coordinating cybersecurity with the US, right before a presidential election? Why did Trump cut Pentagon aid, to divert to wall, from NATO projects, meant to protect European areas from Russian aggression? Why did Trump tell President Zelensky to "Work out a deal with Putin". Why is Putin negotiating US exist strategy from Syria with Turkey?
Why do all roads lead to Putin with this President?
Trump asked Barr to look into the origins of the fake Russian collusion, of which Barr tapped an experienced investigator whos specialty is exactly this scenario.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Arnie123
What's sad is you probably don't know much of anything about Durham beyond what you consume from liberal rags.
I know that John Durham exposed torture within the CIA. I know that the woman implicated in secret torcher camps is serving in a high capacity role in the Trump administration.
I know that John Durham's work is good, but slow and steady. Trump isn't slow and steady at anything, Infact, Trump is showing manic desperation. Therefore, I believe Barr is using Durham's name for legitimacy, but actually is running the show, which has turned into a 3 Ringed Circus.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: KnoxMSP
They are not looking into Russian election meddling.
Right, they're trying to clear Russia of election meddling. Trump thinks that the DNC hacked itself, and then hid the evidence in the Ukraine, to frame Russia for the meddling, and blah, blah, blah, Seth Rich, yada, yada, yada, WikiLeaks.
That is what Bill Barr and John Durham have been in Italy and the UK asking people about.
The Deep State and the Italian government did NO COLLUSION and sent a weirdo Maltese professor named Joseph Mifsud to TRICK Trump campaign foreign policy adviser George Papadopoulos into thinking the Russians had dirty Hillary Clinton emails, thereby forcing Pap to get drunk and barf that intel all over an Australian diplomat, Alexander Downer, in London, at which point (AND ACCORDING TO THE PLAN!) Downer told the FBI what was going on, which gave the Deep State the fake reason it needed to do a witch hunt of Donald Trump, who is pure as the driven snow and NO COLLUSION, NO COLLUSION, YOU ARE THE COLLUSION.
The problem is, they all got caught, before they could execute the scam. And now Trump is being impeached. Barr's been exposed, through Rudy Giuliani's big stupid mouth! Who knows who else in Trump's administration is implicated in this debacle.
Trump asked Barr to look into the origins of the fake Russian collusion
They don't need to hide behind each other for legitimacy, there actions and work are legitimate.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: KnoxMSP
I seriously feel bad for you. It is delusion.
Says the Cult 45 devotee.
I doubt that, as an educated and credentialed man, I can easily see through the emotional feed you so willingly consume and how fitting considering the opinion pieces you chew and gnaw on are the result of your delusional takes and opinions of the issue.
False. None of the so called "collusion" resulted any criminal proceedings and the ones that did were process crimes for lying to federal agents on non related issue such as money. So yes, FAKE.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Arnie123
Trump asked Barr to look into the origins of the fake Russian collusion
Mueller's report documented dozens of incidents of "collusion" between Russian operatives and the Trump Campaign. Mueller's report declined to corollate those efforts with "conspiracy". So, not fake.
Trump wants Barr to debunk Mueller's findings, and blame the Democrats. That was his secret plan, until it blew up in his face because of the hated whistleblower....and all that had ensued.
They don't need to hide behind each other for legitimacy, there actions and work are legitimate.
Barr's inability to let Durham do his job and head the investigation says otherwise. Barr is caught up in Trump's impeachment inquiry. He's tainted.
farther left then the gatewaypundit is right and they even call it satire so its like a fancy dressed up version of the babylon bee with out the joy of them roasting every one like the bee does while it its self is OPENLY satire
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources. Overall, we rate Wonkette strongly left biased based on story selection and opinions that always favor the left and denigrate the right. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to satire being mixed with factual news, which is misleading.
so lol at wonkette being a credible source in the slightest
The main reasons for Wonketteās low quality placement are that in our ranking methodology, highly unfair characterizations of political opponents, such as ad hominem attacks, name calling, and foul language result in low scores for quality and high scores for biasāeven if itās for humor. I see they object to this. I am not calling them āfake news.ā That term is not on the chart. Note that the category they are in for quality is āpropaganda/ contains misleading info,ā which is an āand/orā category. That is, the category is propaganda OR misleading. My ranking categorized them as āpropagandaā because its articles get such high scores in the āunfairness instancesā metric on the article grading rubric. Propaganda is defined in the Oxford English Dictionary as āinformation, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.ā Many Wonkette headlines are also misleadingāfor example, though the headline says otherwise, the chart does not say it is āfake news,ā and, it is ranked meaningfully higher than Louise Menschās blog, Patribotics. However, Wonketteās articles can be categorized more often as āpropagandaā than āmisleading.ā