It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
As a part of his review of the origins of the investigation into members of President Donald Trump's 2016 campaign, Attorney General William Barr asked President Trump on several occasions to initiate introductions between him and the leaders of Australia and Italy, among other countries, a Department of Justice official with direct knowledge of the calls told ABC News on Monday.
The official told ABC News that Barr's visit to Italy last week was related to that review, but did not further characterize who Barr met with or why he would personally travel to a foreign country as a part of the review. According to public readouts released by the White House, Trump last spoke to Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte on Sep. 5.
www.dailykos.com...< br />
It's a bad day to be Attorney General William Barr.
While The New York Times has a blockbuster of a story about how he engineered Donald Trump's request to Australia's Prime Minister for help in discrediting the Mueller probe, The Washington Post reports that he's been overseas trying to get foreign intelligence officials to help, too.
originally posted by: xuenchen
The Executive Branch has every legal right to investigate any and all criminal activity 😎
"Check" and "re-Balance" 😎
originally posted by: BoscoMoney
Something has gone seriously wrong with this reality. I want off.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: BoscoMoney
Something has gone seriously wrong with this reality. I want off.
I've been saying for the past week that the Supreme Court will need to intervene and spell out to Democrats what U.S. law and treaties with foreign nations clearly state.
originally posted by: EartOccupant
a reply to: Goedhardt
Next question: Who is gonna enforce that decission?
originally posted by: Goedhardt
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: BoscoMoney
Something has gone seriously wrong with this reality. I want off.
I've been saying for the past week that the Supreme Court will need to intervene and spell out to Democrats what U.S. law and treaties with foreign nations clearly state.
How does that work? Does anyone need to request that? Or can the SC decide to put out a statement on their own?
originally posted by: carewemust
It's too bad they can't stop what's coming.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: BoscoMoney
Something has gone seriously wrong with this reality. I want off.
I've been saying for the past week that the Supreme Court will need to intervene and spell out to Democrats what U.S. law and treaties with foreign nations clearly state.