It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BlueJacket
no I dont think its poor design. The Small intestine has its shape and length to efficiently extract nutrients from food for cellular energy, blood building and immunity. They are a marvel and even considered the seat of human essence by medevil alchemists.
What an odd assertion
originally posted by: AnakinWayneII
Most of you will be aware of the structure and shape of the small intestines etc.
Some of you might think "looks so squashed", "all bunched up"; "like it's just been shoved in at the last minute"; "like stuffing in too many clothes in my small suitcase".
That last one: "like stuffing in too many clothes in my small suitcase"...
Is this just more further evidence of poor [intelligent] design/no [intelligent] design?
What do to think?
Well, working in Healthcare for more than 25 years, I could relate inummerable wonders of a properly operating GI.
originally posted by: AnakinWayneII
originally posted by: BlueJacket
no I dont think its poor design. The Small intestine has its shape and length to efficiently extract nutrients from food for cellular energy, blood building and immunity. They are a marvel and even considered the seat of human essence by medevil alchemists.
What an odd assertion
That's how you see it? The shape actually allows for a greater chance of issues arising during the digestion process, whilst good is passing through the small intestines...
originally posted by: AnakinWayneII
Is this just more further evidence of poor [intelligent] design/no [intelligent] design?
originally posted by: stosh64
originally posted by: AnakinWayneII
Is this just more further evidence of poor [intelligent] design/no [intelligent] design?
This thread?
Yes, yes it is...
FFS, how many threads do you make in a day?
Go outside for a while.
originally posted by: InTheLight
originally posted by: stosh64
originally posted by: AnakinWayneII
Is this just more further evidence of poor [intelligent] design/no [intelligent] design?
This thread?
Yes, yes it is...
FFS, how many threads do you make in a day?
Go outside for a while.
Outside the mind can be cruel.
originally posted by: seeker1963
originally posted by: InTheLight
originally posted by: stosh64
originally posted by: AnakinWayneII
Is this just more further evidence of poor [intelligent] design/no [intelligent] design?
This thread?
Yes, yes it is...
FFS, how many threads do you make in a day?
Go outside for a while.
Outside the mind can be cruel.
The mind is the enemy! In a world where peoples heads. eyes and thoughts are buried in the internet, tell me that those who want to retain power don't know how to manipulate the mind of those who are sinked. You can't be that naĂŻve?
originally posted by: SaddledMummy
a reply to: AnakinWayneII
Much better design is as like spiderlings use. So, they crab a fly, injecting enzymes into it, so the fly is their bag of Gucci top colon design - portable and removable intestines.
So, why don't mammals use that better version of ... design?
originally posted by: SaddledMummy
a reply to: InTheLight
No, im proud of my guts, these are very well designed. Digestive system takes more than 24h, even 48h to process all the stuff and feed also millions friendly bacteria from this time. Mammals are very happy zookeepers, but...
Gucci!
originally posted by: AnakinWayneII
Is this just more further evidence of poor [intelligent] design/no [intelligent] design?
What do to think?